SWAPA might like SWA proposal

[ron burgundy]

Who knew... all the answers to life are right here on this forum. Everybody knows what the future holds... or he/she knows somebody or he/she is just so right in everything they think. Sickening..........

 

[madjack]

DV,

Do you like it when some SWA posters break out the "nuclear option" threat? Well AAI's version is "give us what we want or we have the arbitrators take it from you"...all these "threats" do is "stir the pot" which I guess is what FI is all about.

 

[kwick]

Going to arbitration is an attempt to get a fair SLI for both parties.

'Nuclear Option" is an attempt to hold a gun to someone's head to get them to
agree with you.

 

[ASADFW7]

When either side breaks out whatever option that pisses you off, you have a choice to react to it or not.

 

[madjack]

Kwick,

You are correct, but we ALL KNOW that arbitration is a an agreed to option for both sides. Enough with the threats.... The SWA SLI proposal will provide managements view of what is F/E and in the best interest of the company.

 

[27 driver]

Nobody knows what arbitration holds. I could go good or bad for either side. Anyone who says differently is nuts. It is an unknown at best. Hopefully this thing gets hammered out in DAL on Friday.

 

[slaquer5]

Crashpad speaks for no one at AirTran except himself.

A crappy SLI will not pass MEMRAT at AAI despite what Crashpad, the consumate defeatist, thinks.

And you my brother, speak for no one but yourself. Why don't you cool it and not get yourself and others worked up.

 

[carl p]

We can't threaten anyone with arbitration, how can you threaten someone with an unknown? If someone on either side says they would rather take their chances in arbitration it isn't a threat, it's a gamble. It is a risky unknown for all sides and avoiding it through mutual co-operation and compromise would be wise.

 

[SWA/FO]

Carl P - the voice of reason! This ones :beer: for you.

 

[DonVerita]

And you my brother, speak for no one but yourself. Why don't you cool it and not get yourself and others worked up.

Only responding to the toxic nonsense put up by some on your side, my brother.

What I've been saying is this: If the two sides can't come to an agreement on their own, then the remedy is federal binding arbitration and we all live with the decision that they make...for better or worse. Why do some of the SWA guys seem to have a problem with that?