Flyprdu
You Want This, Don't You.
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2002
- Posts
- 1,541
It's a shame that Mr. Bloch couldn't take into consideration the fact that our staffing levels were absolutely rock bottom at the time the snapshot was taken.
Case in point:
For the CRJ-900, he awarded a ratio blend of 2.72:1, XJ to 9E CA. By using aircraft on property (41:17), it should be 2.41:1, XJ to 9E.
That's not too terrible.
But this is awful:
For the CRJ-200, Bloch awarded a ratio blend of 5.41:1 9E to XJ CA. By using aircraft on property (124:17), it should be 7.29:1, 9E to XJ!!!
Pinnacle should have AT LEAST 100 more CRJ2 CA positions fenced off, and 30 more CRJ9 CAs.
I think that Mr. Bloch had the right idea, but at least he could have used the same measuring stick.
Case in point:
For the CRJ-900, he awarded a ratio blend of 2.72:1, XJ to 9E CA. By using aircraft on property (41:17), it should be 2.41:1, XJ to 9E.
That's not too terrible.
But this is awful:
For the CRJ-200, Bloch awarded a ratio blend of 5.41:1 9E to XJ CA. By using aircraft on property (124:17), it should be 7.29:1, 9E to XJ!!!
Pinnacle should have AT LEAST 100 more CRJ2 CA positions fenced off, and 30 more CRJ9 CAs.
I think that Mr. Bloch had the right idea, but at least he could have used the same measuring stick.