Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

P180 Vs. Phenom 300 - Avantair Ad

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I didn't know that. Never tried a P180... but would be very surprised to discover I would rather be landing a Citation on snow or slush.

Agree on preference for Citation on snow or slush. I've got plenty of time in both (CE550/560 and P180). 120Kt Vref with no ABS is a downside for P180. Cabin colume and appointments and noise level with very little extra time on a 1000 mile leg is a plus for P180.
 
Don't be such a sensitive putz. He is 100% right on what he said...some people just do not like to ride on TP's, get over it. Some would rather spend the extra cash to be in a jet.

There are two types of people. Those who are flying a prop, and those who wish they were flying a prop. Just another case of "prop envy" if you ask me.
 
There are two types of people. Those who are flying a prop, and those who wish they were flying a prop. Just another case of "prop envy" if you ask me.

who cares what you fly as long as its decent equipment and pay, unfortunately there is not a turboprop out there that pays a good salary.
 
On the other hand ... you don't save that 20 minutes if you can't use a smaller more convenient airport.

Who would not rather land a turboprop on a contaminated or short runway than land a jet?


Many of the so called "Small Airports" are too dangerous to mess with.
 
Props are for boats. Hehehe
 
Does your airplane have a "rudder"?
 
There are two types of people. Those who are flying a prop, and those who wish they were flying a prop. Just another case of "prop envy" if you ask me.


I personally loved flying a prop, the KA 300. The only thing I don't miss is the lack of APU during the summer season. It's the people in the back that usually had the comments about getting into it.
 
You guys wanna cruise the lake in comfort, or would you rather skim the waves with unlce Roman in a jet boat?
















JET BOAT!!!
 
You guys wanna cruise the lake in comfort, or would you rather skim the waves with unlce Roman in a jet boat?
















JET BOAT!!!

LOL- top 10 movies all time. "Time to introduce mr. thick dkic to mr. urinal cake."
 
While killing a few hours today at TEB, I got my first look at a Phenom 300. Wow. Really. Wow. What an incredible aircraft. I can't s-talk about the Phenom 300 in good conscience, now that I've actually taken a look at it.

We've got some new props coming; they're promising 20-25 KIAS faster cruise speed, lower noise footprint, etc. They also have a new meaning that you won't see advertised: they'll keep us in the game against the 300.

The airplane was that nice. Anyway, I'm always up for a good challenge. Let's see how it plays out...

edit to add: well, it WAS missing props. Strike one!
 
Last edited:
While killing a few hours today at TEB, I got my first look at a Phenom 300. Wow. Really. Wow. What an incredible aircraft. I can't s-talk about the Phenom 300 in good conscience, now that I've actually taken a look at it.

We've got some new props coming; they're promising 20-25 KIAS faster cruise speed, lower noise footprint, etc. They also have a new meaning that you won't see advertised: they'll keep us in the game against the 300.

The airplane was that nice. Anyway, I'm always up for a good challenge. Let's see how it plays out...

edit to add: well, it WAS missing props. Strike one!


300 has a really nice cabin and a clean cockpit but still has no TR's ??

I have to shake my head about this.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top