That is absolutely wrong. I don't think it takes a rocket scientist to be a pilot, but it does take SOME spacial reasoning, hand eye coordination, physics knowledge, and communication skills. You do drive a car, right? Do you think everyone that is driving around you could fly an airplane? I bet about 50% of 20-40 year olds could have a chance at passing a commercial checkride. The rest of the population is even lower.
No. I agree with Cynic. I think that you're giving pilots too much credit. Sure, much of your list is true, but just not even close to the extent that you're suggesting. Only 50%? of 20 to 40 year olds can pass a checkride? It's way more than that. In my instructing days, I signed off many commercial candidates and didn't have one failure.....and it was under pt 61 at a mom and pop FBO.
Given the way our "knowledge" tests are designed, study is based more on passing the test versus actual application of knowledge. Heck, just look at all of the so-called
study guides....just questions, answers and brief explanations of answers.
As for flight training, people can train to proficiency as long as they have money......lather, rinse, repeat and most will eventually learn to fly well enough to pass a checkride. As for the oral, instructors tend to design their prepping of the student for the oral part of the checkride to the specific examiner.
Upon obtaining a Private, Commercial, CFI, etc., a pilot doesn't know diddly squat. That's why these certificates are considered to be "licenses to learn."
It just isn't that difficult to obtain one's certificates.