Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Mesaba Redistribution of Snapback Raises

  • Thread starter Thread starter CptOver
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 18

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

CptOver

Inflate to 30 psi
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Posts
30
So, although this topic is old around XJ, it never surfaced here.

Our MEC has proposed an LOA to reduce the CA Dec. 1, 2010 raise, in an effort to increase FO pay. This is a snapback raise from our BK and equals 4% for all pilots. Our FO pay has been a blended rate since 1996, and over that time made our Saab FOs the highest paid turboprop FOs in the industry (per seats). Now that our fleet has shifted, there are less Saab FOs than jet FOs and the majority of our FOs are making less money than their peers.

So my question for the rest of the industry....

Should we...
A) Reduce all CA pay in Dec., to bring FO pay up to about industry avg. for CRJ200/900 (even higher paid for SF340).
B) Wait 1 year till contract negotiations to try increase FO pay through negotiations with Mgmt.

Discuss...
 
I think option B should be more like...

B) Wait 1 year until contract negotiations to negotiate a new F/O pay scale, only to have the company drag out negotiations for three years then file for mediation, have that drag out for three years and once a contract is settled on the F/O pay will only be slightly more than it is today.

So I pick option A
 
I think option B should be more like...

B) Wait 1 year until contract negotiations to negotiate a new F/O pay scale, only to have the company drag out negotiations for three years then file for mediation, have that drag out for three years and once a contract is settled on the F/O pay will only be slightly more than it is today.

So I pick option A

Got to love ALPA, now that they have successfully driven a wedge between the pilot groups of bothMainline and the Regionals, they are wasting no time in doing the same between Captains and FOs. Nothing like telling the Company our Captains are really over paid. Lets see, 200 hour first officer lands a job, not in a 19 seat Metroliner (which by the way he/she could never handle), but a 76 seat Crj900. Add to that, they have, at the tender age of 20 something a guaranteed flow thru to Delta. Seems to me the earnings potential of these FO's far exceed the Captains. But it is all about the redistribution of wealth these days. Support ALPA PAC NOT!!
:mad:
 
Blade, that was way off!

I am not a supporter of ALPA but when you say stupid crap like "Seems to me the earnings potential of these FO's far exceed the Captains" you need to be schooled.

1. No one should get a pay cut.
2. No one is flying a Metro anymore so if you can find one operating for a good company, I am sure that 20 something guy will take that job.
3. FLOWs never work for the regional guys, it on the other hand works fine for the majors.
Ex.. COEX in 2001 when tons of CAL guys flowed back and COEX dudes hit the street. I think only 200 guys ever flowed up to CAL from the deal while CAL sent 500 plus.
EGL....need I say more?

BTW it is not a redistribution of wealth if you are giving it away for a small pay raise and a better hotel in Paris. Call it what it is and not blame Obama for it.

So please take your I am better than the RJ guys attitude back to the 90s. If you are a major guy, please realize that you are the reason there are 1000s of RJ out there. The regional giys want you to keep your scope dont throw it away and blame the guy who was hired because of your vote.
 
Last edited:
So please take your I am better than the RJ guys attitude back to the 90s.

If you keep picking the scab it will never heal.

You are the only one who said anything about better than RJ guys...ever hear of a Freudian slip?
 
This sounds like something only a true brotherhood of pilots would do for each other. Shame on Mesaba ALPA! <sarcasm>

Seems like a great idea to me.
 
Blade, that was way off!

I am not a supporter of ALPA but when you say stupid crap like "Seems to me the earnings potential of these FO's far exceed the Captains" you need to be schooled.

1. No one should get a pay cut.
2. No one is flying a Metro anymore so if you can find one operating for a good company, I am sure that 20 something guy will take that job.
3. FLOWs never work for the regional guys, it on the other hand works fine for the majors.
Ex.. COEX in 2001 when tons of CAL guys flowed back and COEX dudes hit the street. I think only 200 guys ever flowed up to CAL from the deal while CAL sent 500 plus.
EGL....need I say more?

BTW it is not a redistribution of wealth if you are giving it away for a small pay raise and a better hotel in Paris. Call it what it is and not blame Obama for it.

So please take your I am better than the RJ guys attitude back to the 90s. If you are a major guy, please realize that you are the reason there are 1000s of RJ out there. The regional giys want you to keep your scope dont throw it away and blame the guy who was hired because of your vote.

No one should get a pay cut, we agree on that point. FO's deserve more pay no doubt. I was too harsh in my description, I apologize. Thanks for pointing that out.

Second, I did fly the metro and worked part time nights at McDonalds. Never did I ask or expect ALPA to take money from Captains and give it to me. Nor would I have ever supported such a thing. I did however, expect ALPA to bargain with the Company to better our wages and conditions. Not to bargain with our Captains to better our wages and conditions. That sir/mam, is my point here.

The XJ flow does not work like Compass' flow for example. When one flows up only one can flow back. Your point is invalid in this case. The Captains and FO's will flow to Delta unless they say no. Yes they must be Captains but if movement does occur it will go quickly with projected retirements. that means these youngsters will retire Captains on wide body jets. Do the math.

I'm better than the RJ guys? OK, you've lost me. How did this become a question of scope? OH, I KNOW, that wedge ALPA so cunningly drove between Mainline and the Regionals. Apparently it has divide both you and I also. Let's not let that happen again, agreed?
 
If the LOA were to pass, and FOs get a pay raise, will CAs be reduced from their *current* hourly rates? Or will their portion of the pay raise simply go to higher FO rates?
 
If the LOA were to pass, and FOs get a pay raise, will CAs be reduced from their *current* hourly rates? Or will their portion of the pay raise simply go to higher FO rates?

Everyone gets raises. The original snapbacks were 4% for CAs and FOs. The proposed plan is supposedly "cost neutral" and would mean a 2.4% raise for captains and approx 8.4% raise for FOs.
 
CA should keep their pay raises and let the FOs fend for themselves

Yeah, the FOs should have told the MEC Captains 10 years ago that they didn't want a blended rate. . . riiiiight.
 
Give it to the FOs. A few hundred bucks a month extra means much more to someone making 30-something thousand a year.
 
Everyone gets raises. The original snapbacks were 4% for CAs and FOs. The proposed plan is supposedly "cost neutral" and would mean a 2.4% raise for captains and approx 8.4% raise for FOs.

If all else fails---K.I.S.S.
Keep the snapback plan in place!

Can you say self-induced food fight, with no winner? We will all be watching from the sidelines---right beside your management!
 
Last edited:
the XJ alpa is not driving a wedge between the pilots. I think the union has a chance to up the FO pay rates before there section 6 in 2012. Its alot easier to have the FO's get a 8.5% raise now and when section 6 starts get another 8% raise after section 6, than ask for a double digit percent raise for FO's during section 6. I would rather give up 1.6 % out of 4% of my raise that I havent seen yet to help me get better QOL in section 6. Call me crazy, but I would rather lose $1500 dollars a year for a coulpe of years to recoupe it on better QOL, and get that money back after the contract is signed. Think about it, your going into contract talks with the company and the company knows that your going try and get double digit raise for FO's and raise for Captians, why would the company spring for more deadhead pay or higher prediem rates or anything else you can think of that you want to improve QOL when your asking for huge pay raises for crews.

By doing this now, this would also help all the other airlines that are in contract talks. now managment cant use the mesaba FO rates against there own FO's. Just ask 9E guys if there managment didnt try to thrust the mesaba FO rates on there FO's. I think it is just a way to fix the rates to help mesaba get a new contract under 5 years and to help all the companies in section 6 to help bring up there pay rates of FO's. I think its just away to help the industry as a whole.

jsut my 2 cents on the subject
 
If all else fails---K.I.S.S.
Keep the snapback plan in place!

Can you say self-induced food fight, with no winner? We will all be watching from the sidelines---right beside your management!

I was going to contest some of your ideas in your original post, but they're gone.

Many XJ Capts were FOs during 2001-2004 when there were no upgrades. Many probably remember how much it sucked. I hope that more are thinking it would have been easier if we had an industry standard pay and not the sub-par Avro pay that we had.

I remember a road show where I asked why we didn't ditch the blended rate. "Too complicated" was the answer. As if weighing trip rigs vs min day was a simple matter of counting fingers and toes. . .

Parity is fair - regardless of the time frame. Don't keep screwing the FOs because it's a "short term" position. 5 years isn't short term for a regional FO.
 
Yeah, the FOs should have told the MEC Captains 10 years ago that they didn't want a blended rate. . . riiiiight.

Except the many many of the FO's on the property today couldn't have done that 10 years ago unless it was at career day in 6th grade, and one of those Captains were speaking at their class.. We have a large number of FO's who came here right out of college (if they went) and were hired at 20 years old. The point is that these pilots do not understand where this "raise" is coming from, because they have no concept what these captains and FO's lost during the bankruptcy....This "raise" is recovery from the issues that happened when they were in high-school. Remember this 4% is not a "Raise", it restores our wages to where they should have already been for years because of the bankruptcy. You are crazy if you think we will recover that and more during the next contract talks. Too many of the younger pilots have never been through contract negotiations, and just assume that if you ask for something you get it. The union should never voluntarily lower any pay scale.
 
Except the many many of the FO's on the property today couldn't have done that 10 years ago unless it was at career day in 6th grade, and one of those Captains were speaking at their class.. We have a large number of FO's who came here right out of college (if they went) and were hired at 20 years old. The point is that these pilots do not understand where this "raise" is coming from, because they have no concept what these captains and FO's lost during the bankruptcy....This "raise" is recovery from the issues that happened when they were in high-school. Remember this 4% is not a "Raise", it restores our wages to where they should have already been for years because of the bankruptcy. You are crazy if you think we will recover that and more during the next contract talks. Too many of the younger pilots have never been through contract negotiations, and just assume that if you ask for something you get it. The union should never voluntarily lower any pay scale.

Don't worry, us "20 year olds" will all be gone anyway in the next year. The only pilots that will be left on property is the ones from pre-bankruptcy once the saabs are gone. So us young punks will be out of your hair soon. Wait a few months.
 
I'm sorry that you and others are being furloughed. The attitude problem may not be you but others in your demographic. Go over to the Mesaba pilot board and read about how one in your age group called senior mesaba pilots "lazy lifers who should basically get out of the way for the younger people who want to get their PIC to move on to... ? (I'm not sure where they are in such a hurry to move on to) The author also made a point to decide for all of us that making a career out a regional airline is not acceptable.
 
Call me crazy, but I would rather lose $1500 dollars a year for a coulpe of years to recoupe it on better QOL, and get that money back after the contract is signed. Think about it, your going into contract talks with the company and the company knows that your going try and get double digit raise for FO's and raise for Captians, why would the company spring for more deadhead pay or higher prediem rates or anything else you can think of that you want to improve QOL when your asking for huge pay raises for crews.
sut my 2 cents on the subject

No, I'll call you naive, By what brand of logic do you argue a captains pay increase in the next contract when you are basically telling the company now that we don't need the snap back. I can hear them now "Sure, we'll increase the FO pay, but you overpaid Captains have to give us something in return. After all you had no problem giving up a portion of your snap back before"
 

Latest resources

Back
Top