Carl_Spackler
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2005
- Posts
- 705
Flyer, It would be better if you quoted a whole sentence and not just the first part.
Why have FO's only now began to be vocal about the MEC turning down pay FO pay raises in '07? It seems back then, most of the FO's were ok with it, thinking it would give the union enough leverage, given the hiring situation, to get a TA. Well, it looks like that roll of the dice came up craps. The fact that the union made a decision that back fired does not entitle anyone to a bigger slice of the signing bonus pie.... the signing bonus that was intended to make up for the lost COLA.
None of this changes the fact that the seniority system will benefit those with more seniority, which has been the point of my posts so far. Do you disagree with that?
Why have FO's only now began to be vocal about the MEC turning down pay FO pay raises in '07? It seems back then, most of the FO's were ok with it, thinking it would give the union enough leverage, given the hiring situation, to get a TA. Well, it looks like that roll of the dice came up craps. The fact that the union made a decision that back fired does not entitle anyone to a bigger slice of the signing bonus pie.... the signing bonus that was intended to make up for the lost COLA.
None of this changes the fact that the seniority system will benefit those with more seniority, which has been the point of my posts so far. Do you disagree with that?