This is now the second time I will ask you for the source of your "easily verifiable" facts. SWAPA distributed their event summary of those two days. If FAPA has done the same, I have yet to see anyone post it here. Even though it is all just water under the bridge at this point, I would genuinely like to know if I have been lied to by my union.
I didn't see the first time, and your question is a reasonable one.
If SWAPA is stating that they contacted anyone on the FAPA M&A committee on Thursday, then yes they are lying. It didn't happen.
N1atecon - I have read all of the updates. The one that you reference only tells half of the story, actually less than half. Regarding the furlough compensation item, it was going to cost every active pilot less than .80 per hour of credit and it was a negotiable item just like every other item on the proposal. I thought that SWAPA was highly regarded for "looking out for their own" and as you and every other supposed SWAPA member on this board has stated numerous times "every FAPA member was going to have recall rights" and "every FAPA member was going to have a SWAPA number from day one". Is .80 per hour too much to ask for a fellow SWAPA member? Or did we have a different opinion of the "excess FAPA pilots"?
SWAPA is doing exactly what they should be doing, telling the membership their version of events. You need to read the "updates" and take note of what they don't say. Several readers are connecting dots that just don't exist.
Take a look at the "summary of those two days" from a different perspective. SWAPA ended the meeting on Wednesday and requested everyone to meet in Dallas the next day, unfortunately around 2pm MST the next day SWA removed their bid. Several SWAPA members wanted this deal, especially the junior guys. Who would YOU rather blame, FAPA or your own company?
Take a further step back and consider the following. Your FO's blew up the last TA. Your FO's have the most to lose from the failed F9 acquisition. If your FO's realize that they have been led down the wrong path for the third time in less than a year, they will go absolutely ballistic. If you are looking down the barrel of a furlough, and your company just failed to purchase a furlough safety net, then your just adding fuel to the fire, never mind the fact that the only leverage you had with your ongoing negotiations just got acquired by a competitor. How many millions of dollars have been taken out of the company's position since the failed TA ratification? SWAPA is in the middle of the greatest PR campaign in recent history. I commend them for their efforts, and I would do the same exact thing in their position.
I really have had an interest in "setting the record straight", but I am losing that interest at a rapid rate.
If you want to believe that FAPA walked away, than so be it. Don't care. If you want to believe that FAPA presented a "take it or leave it offer", then you are welcome to live in that fantasy world.
What I know or what you believe really doesn't matter. I wish you all the best regardless.
And Gup, you owe me several beers. PM me your schedule.
I am going to save my energy for the inevitable "FAPA vs RAH/IBT/YX/ALPA/Globalwarming/PETA" battle that I am sure is going to fire up any day now.