Browntothebone
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2002
- Posts
- 743
More mainline jets and less Connection jets is a good thing.
Not for regional pilots.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More mainline jets and less Connection jets is a good thing.
Not for regional pilots.
It is if those regional pilots ever want to move on and out of the regionals
You are correct. However, most regional pilots nowdays claim that they have no intention of trying to get on at a major and want a career at the regionals, hence the desire for larger regional aircraft that they can fly.
By this math, the CRJ-200.Let's see.... CRJ-200. ~2500-3000 lbs an hour for 50 pax.
757-200.... ~7000 lbs an hour for 184 pax.
MD-90.. ~5500-6000 an hour for 150 pax.
Who's the gas hog?
By this math, the CRJ-200.
See Uncle Jed, I can cipher after all....
Jethro Bodine
What if you only have 40-50 pax?
Every airplane has its purpose.
Every airplane is a gas hog half full.
A 757-200 would have to have around 50 open seats to equal the burn per passenger of a full CRJ-200.
A 757-200 would have to have around 50 open seats to equal the burn per passenger of a full CRJ-200.
"Growth for Delta would be great! But the MOST important thing is these planes will not say " Connection " on the side. "
How bout DCI pilots starting a 90for90for90 campaign? That would make Delta profitable finally.
How about you play in the highway during rush hour, that would make a lot of people happy!
What is your point? What about the rest of the paying folks in the back? What about the fact that you can take over 4 times the amount of people you can lift on a CRJ-200 and go non-stop for long distances.
RA mentioned in the conference call that he is effectively parking a lot of the regional jets. I am glad he is finally getting the picture. He knew it all along. I think he knows that he can't come to labor any more and he is going to have to cut costs elsewhere,
Glad to hear we are getting MD-90s for our operation. Makes a lot more sense.
How bout you give me a smooth ride and not loose my bags when I'm forced to ride on your sorry a$$ed excuse of an airline. And keep the temp in the front rows comfy too.
I think you missed the pointI was i was illustrating a point to a couple RJ guys that referred to us getting MD-90s as "buying more gas guzzlers." Which is obviously far from the truth as I pointed out how inefficent the burn on the CRJ is per passenger as compared to a 757 or MD-90.
You and I are on the same team and same point of view...
FWIW, I've heard for now these will not be growth airplanes, but replace MD-88s and DC-9's 1 for 1. Always subject to change, of course.
Compare an MD-90 and a 757 burn per passenger seat. Using your logic, the MD-90 should stay in the desert because the seat burn is more than a
757.
What would happen at your airline if you had nothing but 757's? What would happen if you had nothing but MD-90's?
Different airplanes in your fleet have different missions. The idea with a Global airline is to have access to as many markets as possible. Under the concept, it takes many different size airplanes to reach those markets. Regional jets are a part of the armada--and will be until there is a suitable or more efficient replacement. Feed is critical and can make the difference in profitability. Otherwise, Delta would not have began marketing agreements in the mid 1980's. USAir was the catylist in the concept of feed, and competitors soon followed.