Pilot Facing Felony Charges After Allegedly Waiving Gun

[SpoilerFault]

When I read the title I envisioned some pilot brandishing a pistol in order to deal with some skanky white trash pax.

 

[MCDU]

I still remember the Jetblue pilots beating up the Haitian Cab driver in FLL. What ever happened to that felony charge?

M

 

[~~~^~~~]

the article states that she thought inman had a handgun in his hand. (my girfrield, ah, uh, noticed what looked like a pistol in his hand). They're not sure what they saw...either the boyfriend or girlfriend. Nowhere does it state she saw him brandish the firearm, threaten with the firearm, or even engage in "road range." it doesn't describe words being exchaned, any threats, or anything more than inman applying his brakes. The woman claims that inman almost hit her, but that she had to apply her brakes to keep from "rear ending" him.

Then after "fearing for her life," she elected to follow him to the supermarket.

So many inconsistencies, so much bs. Nothing to see here.

+1 ....

 

[vetrider]

+1 ....

+2...

 

[Guppy Guy]

It's because of incidents like these that we should ban assault rifles.

Yes, we should. Oh yeah, I forgot, you guys need those for hunting

The FFDO program is a joke.

 

[Colonel Savage]

"I still remember the Jetblue pilots beating up the Haitian Cab driver in FLL. What ever happened to that felony charge?"



Don't know. At first I thought this guy was one of them, but he just bears a strong resemblence to one of them.

 

[jetjock6]

It's because of incidents like these that we should ban assault rifles.

"Guns don't kill people, the government does"-Dale Dribble

 

[filejw]

He said she said......

 

[avbug]

Yes, we should. Oh yeah, I forgot, you guys need those for hunting

The FFDO program is a joke.

The FFDO program isn't a joke, not by a long shot. However, it has no part in this discussion. Did you simply imagine that the subject is an FFDO, or do you have some particular insight? Or did you simply introduce that non-sequitur nonsense to cloud the issue?

You have a beef with second ammendment ownership of rifles? You think the only viable use or reason to posses a rifle is for hunting? I have three safes filled with rifles and handguns...and I don't hunt. I can think of a lot of other legitimate uses for them, though. Not the least of which is exercising my constitutional right to not only own them, but to bear them.

Here we have an article which provides no evidence of any wrongdoing...not even in the basic accusation...and yet you are quick to throw in your own agenda on unrelated topics our of the blue? More than wild assumption, perhaps first you should learn of whence you speak.

 

[PeanuckleCRJ]

Yes, we should. Oh yeah, I forgot, you guys need those for hunting

The FFDO program is a joke.

So how is my M4 (AR15) any different than any other small caliber rifle other than it looks cool? On top of that.. how is it different than any other semi-automatic rifle or pistol?

I personally consider it safer than a pistol b/c it's pinpoint accurate, extremely reliable, has virtually no recoil, and just the sight of it will scare the (poo poo) out of anyone.


Your opinion of the FFDO program is yours, but is way off base.

 

[frog_flyer]

Not reading through this retarded thread, but I hope someone already noticed:


"When I honked at the guy, he slammed on his breaks, almost forcing me to rear-end him," the unidentified woman said.

Kill yourself.

 

[stb]

I still remember the Jetblue pilots beating up the Haitian Cab driver in FLL. What ever happened to that felony charge?

M

Charges dropped. Both flying the line.

 

[Guppy Guy]

The FFDO program isn't a joke, not by a long shot. However, it has no part in this discussion. Did you simply imagine that the subject is an FFDO, or do you have some particular insight? Or did you simply introduce that non-sequitur nonsense to cloud the issue?

You have a beef with second ammendment ownership of rifles? You think the only viable use or reason to posses a rifle is for hunting? I have three safes filled with rifles and handguns...and I don't hunt. I can think of a lot of other legitimate uses for them, though. Not the least of which is exercising my constitutional right to not only own them, but to bear them.

Here we have an article which provides no evidence of any wrongdoing...not even in the basic accusation...and yet you are quick to throw in your own agenda on unrelated topics our of the blue? More than wild assumption, perhaps first you should learn of whence you speak.

You guys are so easy. LMAO

 

[cocknbull]

It's because of incidents like these that we should ban assault rifles.

It's because of the federal government that we should have fully automatic weapons.

 

[Whine Lover]

" Guns don't kill people. I kill people." - Author Unknown


.