Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Pilot Facing Felony Charges After Allegedly Waiving Gun

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Register   Log in
It's because of incidents like these that we should ban assault rifles. ;)
 
The article states that she thought Inman had a handgun in his hand. (My girfrield, ah, uh, noticed what looked like a pistol in his hand). They're not sure what they saw...either the boyfriend or girlfriend. Nowhere does it state she saw him brandish the firearm, threaten with the firearm, or even engage in "road range." It doesn't describe words being exchaned, any threats, or anything more than Inman applying his brakes. The woman claims that Inman almost hit her, but that she had to apply her brakes to keep from "rear ending" him.

Then after "fearing for her life," she elected to follow him to the supermarket.

So many inconsistencies, so much BS. Nothing to see here.
 
Last edited:
"When I honked at the guy, he slammed on his breaks, almost forcing me to rear-end him," the unidentified woman said.
Click to expand...

I pull this particular stunt all the time. Works 85% of the time. One guy almost pounded me into the asphalt.
 
Didn't a B6 pilot in the FFDO program bring his gun into a bar fight in Florida a few years ago? I remember that story floating around but I never heard the result. I assume they fired him.
 
I liked the part in the video where they hide behind a tree because they "fear" for their lives.

I agree with an above poster, this story is a crock, and the gun bashing media runs with it.

Even if true, he should be charged with brandishing a firearm, not pointing it at someone, even the "terrified victims" dont claim that.
 
For some reason, I picture these folks as hippie-like liberals driving around in their 80's Volvo with sun-bleached copies of the New Yorker strewn about the interior.
 
I like the photo of him with Billy Big Mouth Bass.

Here is a little song I wrote
You might want to sing it note for note
Don't worry... be happy
Don't worry, be happy now.
 
Man if no one could see what I typed was tongue in cheek....It's called pointing out absurdity.

Still just the M4 on my end.


crj567- Having a fluffball dog that is pee-pad trained in the house, you get pretty good at finding the clean end of poop. ;) ..with appropriate hand protection of course.
 
I still remember the Jetblue pilots beating up the Haitian Cab driver in FLL. What ever happened to that felony charge?

M
 
avbug said:
the article states that she thought inman had a handgun in his hand. (my girfrield, ah, uh, noticed what looked like a pistol in his hand). They're not sure what they saw...either the boyfriend or girlfriend. Nowhere does it state she saw him brandish the firearm, threaten with the firearm, or even engage in "road range." it doesn't describe words being exchaned, any threats, or anything more than inman applying his brakes. The woman claims that inman almost hit her, but that she had to apply her brakes to keep from "rear ending" him.

Then after "fearing for her life," she elected to follow him to the supermarket.

So many inconsistencies, so much bs. Nothing to see here.
Click to expand...
+1 ....
 
"I still remember the Jetblue pilots beating up the Haitian Cab driver in FLL. What ever happened to that felony charge?"



Don't know. At first I thought this guy was one of them, but he just bears a strong resemblence to one of them.
 
Yes, we should. Oh yeah, I forgot, you guys need those for hunting:rolleyes:

The FFDO program is a joke.
Click to expand...

The FFDO program isn't a joke, not by a long shot. However, it has no part in this discussion. Did you simply imagine that the subject is an FFDO, or do you have some particular insight? Or did you simply introduce that non-sequitur nonsense to cloud the issue?

You have a beef with second ammendment ownership of rifles? You think the only viable use or reason to posses a rifle is for hunting? I have three safes filled with rifles and handguns...and I don't hunt. I can think of a lot of other legitimate uses for them, though. Not the least of which is exercising my constitutional right to not only own them, but to bear them.

Here we have an article which provides no evidence of any wrongdoing...not even in the basic accusation...and yet you are quick to throw in your own agenda on unrelated topics our of the blue? More than wild assumption, perhaps first you should learn of whence you speak.
 
Guppy Guy said:
Yes, we should. Oh yeah, I forgot, you guys need those for hunting:rolleyes:

The FFDO program is a joke.
Click to expand...




So how is my M4 (AR15) any different than any other small caliber rifle other than it looks cool? On top of that.. how is it different than any other semi-automatic rifle or pistol?

I personally consider it safer than a pistol b/c it's pinpoint accurate, extremely reliable, has virtually no recoil, and just the sight of it will scare the (poo poo) out of anyone.


Your opinion of the FFDO program is yours, but is way off base.
 
Not reading through this retarded thread, but I hope someone already noticed:


"When I honked at the guy, he slammed on his breaks, almost forcing me to rear-end him," the unidentified woman said.

Kill yourself.
 
avbug said:
The FFDO program isn't a joke, not by a long shot. However, it has no part in this discussion. Did you simply imagine that the subject is an FFDO, or do you have some particular insight? Or did you simply introduce that non-sequitur nonsense to cloud the issue?

You have a beef with second ammendment ownership of rifles? You think the only viable use or reason to posses a rifle is for hunting? I have three safes filled with rifles and handguns...and I don't hunt. I can think of a lot of other legitimate uses for them, though. Not the least of which is exercising my constitutional right to not only own them, but to bear them.

Here we have an article which provides no evidence of any wrongdoing...not even in the basic accusation...and yet you are quick to throw in your own agenda on unrelated topics our of the blue? More than wild assumption, perhaps first you should learn of whence you speak.
Click to expand...

You guys are so easy. LMAO
 

Share this page

Latest posts

Latest resources

Latest media

Carbon Cub FX-3 Shenandoah Valley
Carbon Cub at Kittyhawk
FX-3 in the backcountry
IFR Panel in a Carbon Cub FX-3
Cub-Provo-UT-c.jpg
Back
Top Bottom