B1900 Mech
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2004
- Posts
- 50
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have you ever heard of an "administrative end-run?" This is a textbook example. Ending the program would be politically unpopular. By 're-allocating' the funds that support the FFDO program he is putting a de facto end to the program without political consequences. This is Politics 101.Read the article closer your title is wrong! Funds are being re-allocated but the program is not ending!!!!
Read the article closer your title is wrong! Funds are being re-allocated but the program is not ending!!!!
Its not his title. Its the Washington Times title.
The same could be said about any number of establishment papers. The New York Times comes to mind.The Washington Times (this is not the Washington Post) is nothing more than a political tabloid. They have a very loose editorial policy where they will publish just about anything if it suites their political agenda. Likewise, they will not publish the editorial authors names.
I also find it ironic that the gun loving, Obama hating right wingers now point the finger at Obama for a lack of support in this program when Bush tried like he** to keep it from ever becoming a reality in the first place.
call it ironic all you want...we were bitchin and yelling then, and we are bitching and yelling now![]()
Once Osama and has liberal lapdog eric holder are done trampling our second amendment rights, through the back door of course, by placing astronomical taxes ammunition and firearms, the FFDO program will be next. I'm sure it will be MUCH more diffcult to become an FFDO in the future. I would be suprised to see the most anti-gun/self defense administration in the history of the US expand on any program in which the government issues weapons.