fischman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2005
- Posts
- 2,360
No, that is not what I'm saying. Be clear then. You have not made a clear post.
When a trend develops that can prove a concerted effort, even if it is a rogue effort, of write-ups outside of the ordinary, the injunction can be granted stopping the behavior. So they are supposed to leave the items broken??? Who is supposed to do these write ups??? The trends are easy to identify because there are usually only a small percentage of pilots that will act stupidly. That small group will make the entire group look like idiots, By doing their job and writing up broken airplanes? How does that make them look like idiots? and the union gets bad press when the injunction is issued. The company gets bad press when planes start falling out of the sky too.
Like I said, do the writeups, be safe, show the trend so the injunction can be filed. The quicker the better. Speed is not the measurement of a good job.
You seem to think that it can't happen.
Here is the original injuntion based on the slowdown. That wasn't "sanctioned" by the union either, but I'm certain that it made the pilots stop the behavior.
http://www.airlinesafety.com/articles/ComairInjunction.htm
No one is scared of the same injuction you keep posting. You are throwing FUD