Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

FLASH, This just in,...NWA and DAL pilots

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
The majors have been undercut by the regionals for years.
That is because the mainline pilots drew a circle around that flying that excluded the pilots performing it. A union's primary job is to bring folks together. By keeping us separate and allowing alter ego competition, we have reaped exactly what we have sown.
 
That is because the mainline pilots drew a circle around that flying that excluded the pilots performing it. A union's primary job is to bring folks together. By keeping us separate and allowing alter ego competition, we have reaped exactly what we have sown.

You did read my entire post didnt you? Re-Read it and you will see i just said what you posted in responce to my post;) :laugh:
 
So maybe I'm agreeing with you.


Ok good now we are getting somewhere :) I just wanted to make sure because you quoted only the part that made my post look negative and i wanted to clarify that that was just the beginning of my well orchestrated post ;) :beer:
 
Superpilot:

What Joe will correctly point out is that NWA and Delta's rates on similar equipment undercuts ASA's contract rates. Sad, but true. He's got us there.
 
Superpilot:

What Joe will correctly point out is that NWA and Delta's rates on similar equipment undercuts ASA's contract rates. Sad, but true. He's got us there.


Oh you mean the concessionary rates? So when those go up will his go up? He didn't get us there my friend. His company and our old companies thrived after 9/11 where NWA/DAL took massive hits. Compare those rates and he has no argument. Plus had mainline not given up that flying his company wouldn't exist in its present form, correct? two sides to every coin.
 
Perhaps within the MEC, but not at the line pilot level.

A course reversal, regardless of sound logic and reason, would destroy credibility and trust. Already there was a halfway organized run on the MEC. Take the goodies off the table, along with job protections and the fear of fleet reductions and it is a highly undesireable position for any ALPA politician. A very quick way to be outside the circle of trust.

We don't know if Occam's bomb is real, a Hollywood prop, or wishful thinking on the part of the NWA MEC.

Both sides are pretty well painted in a corner.

Now management on the other hand.... although Occam says this is a MEC thing.... hmm, still need a lot more information....


Heyas Fins,

Occam's reports are correct. There have been "talks" going during the week. Management's job has been done for weeks, and they just need to make a phone call.

You are right that both sides are painted in the corner. But the sad fact is that this merger has been planned out for a long time, and a few pissy, whiney pilots are not going to stop it, despite what goodwill "promises" were made.

Word came down from the respective companies:"this thing is going to happen...period. So you guys can either get onboard or get run over." This is why you see an abrupt about face and the two groups meeting again. Union politics at this point are irrelevant.

I suspect that any agreement will split the difference between the last two respective positions...just like most good negotiations do. Each side will be able to save face by bringing something back, there will be a hue and cry from the vocal minority, but the huge silent majority at each airline will see the writing on the wall, and vote the thing in.

Then we can get on with the business of being pissed at each other for the rest of our careers, with NWA guys wearing buttons that say "Keep Delta their Delta" and cutsey little stickers on the DAL flight bags that have a Viking with a circle and slash.

In the end, it won't matter one iota what any of us thinks.

Nu
 
...but the huge silent majority at each airline will see the writing on the wall, and vote the thing in.

I know of a great may folks at Delta who had no plans to "rubber stamp" the original plan (pay raises of 7/4/4/4% seemed pretty low, even with some "equity").

I bet even fewer will vote "yes" if the new agreement offers less.

Then Delta can raise the bar over AA's, SWA's, and CAL's new contracts next year...the way it's supposed to work. Beats settling for a concessionary contract going forward.
 
Last edited:
I am just curious if the 9's will be parked. If they are we are in store for lots of furloughs at this new airline
 
Word came down from the respective companies:"this thing is going to happen...period. So you guys can either get onboard or get run over."

I suspect that any agreement will split the difference between the last two respective positions....

Then we can get on with the business of being pissed at each other for the rest of our careers....

Nu
Nu,

That would be a reversal for the Delta Management team and Delta's pilot leadership. The press is not reporting "this thing is going to happen, period" and internally Delta is touting it's stand alone plan.
 
Last edited:
Occam:

You could be correct, but politically I can not find it to be a credible report given other known facts.

WTF are you talking about?

Both sides will continue to try to reach agreement up until the moment that option is removed by other events.

Period.

There have, and will, be "gaps" in direct engagement...for various reasons. Doesn't matter. Both MEC teams understand the importance of getting a deal, especially if the airlines are going to be merged regardless.

Don't confuse the juvenile banter on this forum, or the often-manipulated reporting in the media as indicative of what is actually taking place.
 
Occam:

We were, and are, told that the option has been removed by other events. We were also told this was not a negotiation, this was a deal.

Look at the contrast in rumors. Internally, Delta's senior leadership (who would keep their jobs) are saying the stand alone plan is a better option and fuel prices mean any deal with NWA would have to be completely re-evaluated. Crew room rumors started by flight operations management, fleet and network management, involves a bunch more 777-200LR jets. Thus far, Delta's objective decisions on hiring and routes match these subjective rumors.

On the NWA side, all we hear about is the merger's inevitability.

I'm not calling you a liar, but somebody somewhere is completely failing to manage expectations and that could very well be a fatal political mistake.

There have been some off hand rumors of buying parts of NWA, but I dismissed those comments. Are you hearing that on the NWA side?

I'll admit the Delta BOD could over ride Delta's leadership, but ALPA's got a person on the board and of course Anderson is there. My point is if what you write is true, many people have painted themselves in a corner and the political fall out would be nasty for not only for the Delta Reps, but also senior management.

I genuinely disagree with you about the merger's inevitability. I'm not saying you are wrong, but I simply do not see how it can be forced by the minority who's management will not be the leadership in the combined entity. Perhaps you are right and I am a fool for believing the press, my reps, and management who are held accountable, over nameless web board rumor. But you are very convinced, and convincing.... Thank you for the information in any event.
 
Last edited:
Why is it that a large group of the DAL posters on hear come across as Armchair CEO's? Do some of you actually think you have control over what happens in the board meetings with the CEO's? Now back to your regularly scheduled flame fest.:p
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom