Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

NPA Hat Survey

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Actually, ALL of us were TOLD, very specifically, by several HR personnel and just about everyone in the training department that upgrades for us would be about two years.

In their words (heard repeatedly): "You're going to come back in for one recurrent, then, the next time your'e here, it will be for upgrade".

No, it's not a promise, and I don't think the man said anything about having bet the bank on it (he actually very specifically said he was well aware of the vagueries of upgrade timing), so have a cup of decaf, man...
So he's been at five airlines, but isn't smart enough to know that things change EVERY day? Of the three things we are discussing, the ONLY thing that was a SURE thing is that the company expects you to wear your hat. End of story. Don't like the hat, petition to change the policy. Don't like the FO pay, help out our union. Upgrade? Buy the company an airplane on the condition that you get to fly in the left seat, otherwise, wait until seniority holds it. That's what we all have to do.

Making a "statement" about FO wages and not upgrading soon enough by not wearing the hat is just plain immature and stupid. It serves no purpose whatsoever. It just makes him look like an ass as he carries it around the terminal.

Jeez, we're actually going to go 7 pages about the stupid hat.

Yes, I wore mine. Yes, it was because it was company policy, even when I got off probation. I agreed to follow the rules, so I did. Period. I don't especially like it. I cut my hair pretty short and it still gets sweaty and messed up with the hat on.

It *DOES* make the whole uniform a lot snazzier... but only if you're wearing the blazer and not the dog sh*t brown leather jacket. What a stupid color...

Oh yeah,

GO FILL OUT THE WEB SURVEY FOR YOUR NEGOTIATING TEAM!!!
Agreed.
 
Last edited:
Incidentally, the following make up part of our senority list:
- at least 6 pilots I know of who have flown the Vice President of the United States
- a Thunderbird Pilot
- countless military pilots who have thousands of hours of combat time

OOOOOOOHH. AHHHHHHHH.

That's amazing! (hint of sarcasm) It's also the makeup of every freaking airline in the US. If I need to do an outside loop on the way to Cleveland I hope I get the Thunderbird pilot.

As far as Vice Presidential pilots, ask them why the chumps in DC want military pilots who must retire by 55 years old when it's their fat a$$es in the back of the plane. Because it's safer - that's why.

Anyway, get over it. It's just another average pilot group. Nobody's is better or worse. You've got your Thunderbirds, your child molesters, and your Thunderbird child molesters at every airline.

PIPE
 
Last edited:
We don't call them stewardeses anymore. Maybe in your Grandma's day thats what they were called. I'm glad you feel like a real pilot with your hat on dude. All the more power to you. I can look the part and be the utmost professional without it.

Who is we? When talking with the public they constantly calls FAs stewardesses and ask me what "routes" I fly.

You might be able to be professional, but the public has an expectation and a belief.......and its not the same as yours.....


same ol hat thread.....


all the non hatters claim they are professionals..... but none can define what it means to be a professional. They can't quantify it....

In addition, all those against the hat always argue the hat from their personal comfort. They never have a professional against it....probably because they can't quantify what air line pilot professionalism is....


On the May 2007 SWA timetable cover was a picture of two SWA pilots.....wearing hats....
 
Actually, ALL of us were TOLD, very specifically, by several HR personnel and just about everyone in the training department that upgrades for us would be about two years.

In their words (heard repeatedly): "You're going to come back in for one recurrent, then, the next time your'e here, it will be for upgrade".

No, it's not a promise, and I don't think the man said anything about having bet the bank on it (he actually very specifically said he was well aware of the vagueries of upgrade timing), so have a cup of decaf, man...

Jeez, we're actually going to go 7 pages about the stupid hat.

Yes, I wore mine. Yes, it was because it was company policy, even when I got off probation. I agreed to follow the rules, so I did. Period. I don't especially like it. I cut my hair pretty short and it still gets sweaty and messed up with the hat on.

It *DOES* make the whole uniform a lot snazzier... but only if you're wearing the blazer and not the dog sh*t brown leather jacket. What a stupid color...

Oh yeah,

GO FILL OUT THE WEB SURVEY FOR YOUR NEGOTIATING TEAM!!!
It *DOES* make the whole uniform a lot snazzier... but only if you're wearing the blazer and not the dog sh*t brown leather jacket. What a stupid color...
 
Hey Lucky, change your name to "Shaved Dogs Ass"

Hey Lear70, those sh>t brown leather jackets heve;

-been with Chenault in China
-been over the "hump" in Burma
-been on daily 1000 plane missions over Germany
-been over the beaches at Normandy
-been over Patton's 3rd Army
-been over Bastogne
-been on the Berlin airlift
-been in Glamorous Glennis
-been north of the Yalu river
-been north of the Tigress river
-BEEN APART OF AIR TRAN

and it beats the sh>t out of looking like some south Jersey wise guy or some half assed Greek shrimp boat captain. Wear the stripes if you like just make sure it is tailored and fit.
 
Well, we now know one thing. Hat or not, you could never be considered a professional of any kind. Ass.

One other thing. Your screen name says it all. You would certainly never get past an interview board if you had to.


You guys are wimps...how bout getting a ********************ing contract instead of taking opinion polls on hats...stupid. If you don't like your hat...don't wear it...unless coach is around, ah screw it take it off anyway for that scab
 
Hey Lucky, change your name to "Shaved Dogs Ass"

Hey Lear70, those sh>t brown leather jackets heve;

-been with Chenault in China
-been over the "hump" in Burma
-been on daily 1000 plane missions over Germany
-been over the beaches at Normandy
-been over Patton's 3rd Army
-been over Bastogne
-been on the Berlin airlift
-been in Glamorous Glennis
-been north of the Yalu river
-been north of the Tigress river
-BEEN APART OF AIR TRAN

and it beats the sh>t out of looking like some south Jersey wise guy or some half assed Greek shrimp boat captain. Wear the stripes if you like just make sure it is tailored and fit.
Wow... someone must need a pep talk for their military withdrawal syndrome...

I'm grateful for the service of our men and women who have served, especially on overseas tours, but here's a news flash:

It has ABSOLUTELY ZERO, ZILCH, NADA to do with the airline world. Two completely different animals.

The FACT is that the blazer with a hat simply looks more professional for an airline pilot. Period. Always has... always will.

Not to mention that the blazer with a FULL-LENGTH trench coat is a hell of a lot warmer than the bomber jacket anyway when you actually have to go somewhere cold with dress slacks on (nice to have something covering down to my shins).

I don't care if the leather jacket stays or not. I really couldn't give a rat's; I don't have to wear it if I don't want and it's funny when people approach the F/O wearing the blazer instead of the leather jacket wearing Captain and assume the F/O is in command because he's dressed accordingly (seen it happen twice - it gets funnier every time).

However, I AM concerned over Scope, Compensation, Retirement, and Insurance. But flip out over the jacket if it's that important to you... to each his own. :rolleyes:
 
It has ABSOLUTELY ZERO, ZILCH, NADA to do with the airline world. Two completely different animals.

:rolleyes:

Strange, I have an old photo from the thirties of two airline pilots in the cockpit wearing.........leather jackets.(and hats!!)
The brown leather jacket is synonymous with flying, it is a tradition. Love it or loathe it, your choice.
I don't think Dodeenf has "military withdrawal", (a little condescending on your part) he was just answering your original question regarding the "dog sh!t brown" color.
I happen to like mine for it's practicality and I receive many compliments on it from passengers. I also happen to think our navy blue blazer with sparkly gold stripes looks theatrical, but that's just me.
Have a nice day.
 
Last edited:
Strange, I have an old photo from the thirties of two airline pilots in the cockpit wearing.........leather jackets.(and hats!!)
The brown leather jacket is synonymous with flying, it is a tradition. Love it or loathe it, your choice.
I don't think Dodeenf has "military withdrawal", (a little condescending on your part) he was just answering your original question regarding the "dog sh!t brown" color.
I happen to like mine for it's practicality and I receive many compliments on it from passengers. I also happen to think our navy blue blazer with sparkly gold stripes looks theatrical, but that's just me.
Have a nice day.
It may have been condescending on my part; his post was just as condescending, lecturing me on just how many military scenarios the leather jacket has been in (hint, didn't need the lecture).

I happen to have a very nice LAMBSKIN (very soft) black A-2 from my Express One days (which I bought as part of the uniform, wore once, then put in the closet for leisure wear - I liked the longer trench coat in the winter on the freight ramp in the freezing cold snow and slush). I agree, it's a classic look, great to wear... away from work, flying in a Cub or a Citabria or just around town. I'm well aware of the history behind the A-2 and its predecessors.

You may get compliments on yours. Don't know what pilots from the 30's have anything to do with it (leather jackets and hats were military cockpit garb, too and, in the 30's, the airlines had just BARELY began to form into what we have today).

I can't seem to find any pictures from the 50's and 60's from Major carriers wearing leather jackets - the same time when contracts that shaped the industry and made pilots VERY well-compensated professionals were signed.

Again, my point was that the guy went off about how many theaters the leather jacket has been in WHEN WE SHOULD BE WORRIED MORE ABOUT OUR CONTRACT.

PCL is right; it's absolutely deplorable how many people will get upset about derogatory comments regarding the jacket or its removal from our approved uniform and how few people will step up and complain about our substandard F/O pay, high insurance premiums, and the crap that was T.A. 1 and 2.

Like I said, wear the jacket, I don't care (same for the hat). But can we keep our eye on the ball?

Hope you have a good day, too. :beer:
 
Last edited:
We didn't get here......

I can't seem to find any pictures from the 50's and 60's from Major carriers wearing leather jackets - the same time when contracts that shaped the industry and made pilots VERY well-compensated professionals were signed.

without first being here....

You may get compliments on yours. Don't know what pilots from the 30's have anything to do with it (leather jackets and hats were military cockpit garb, too and, in the 30's, the airlines had just BARELY began to form into what we have today).




Hey Lear70, those sh>t brown leather jackets heve;

-been with Chenault in China
-been over the "hump" in Burma
-been on daily 1000 plane missions over Germany
-been over the beaches at Normandy
-been over Patton's 3rd Army
-been over Bastogne
-been on the Berlin airlift
-been in Glamorous Glennis
-been north of the Yalu river
-been north of the Tigress river
-BEEN APART OF AIR TRAN



Keep in mind MIL folks... if it weren't for the civilian pilots during WWII we might have failed miserably....

Read : When the Airlines went to War.

Back in the 10's and 20's MIL aviation was born out of CIV aviation.

The CIV guys were wearing anything they could to keep warm in open cockpit planes. Some of the first pax service was a man or lady riding on a mailbag in a closed compartment while the pilot sat in an open cockpit....

The quasi-MIL uniforms were worn to instill confidence in the traveling public in part to the new-ness of commercial flying and the high accident rate. IOW, the uniform including the hat was worn to stifle fear.

Hats were not worn to make pilots better or more professional. Hats were worn to help keep ticket sales up.... It was all about appearances. If you went to see a movie with your fav actor and they were wearing jeans and a T-shirt... thier part would not be as believable... and you'd might feel jip'ed out of your money. You might even feel diss'ed as your fav actor tries to get you to believe they are playing a part set 200 years ago... in jeans and a tshirt that says "I banged Angeline!"...


Now, consider the pax perspective when they show up.... Do the pax want the Deltoid with hat or Bomber Bob?

I believe the image still means something. I am not willing to risk it..... and neither are most....

that is why.....

did you forgo the tie in your interview? Why not? You don't need a tie... or a suit for that matter to prove you can do the job...... do you?
 
Last edited:
Don't know what pilots from the 30's have anything to do with it (leather jackets and hats were military cockpit garb, too and, in the 30's, the airlines had just BARELY began to form into what we have today).

Well those pilots from the thirties and forties might have something to say about who formed the airlines we see today. Uniforms are essentially Military garb in one form or another.
I too hope to see a new contract this year and I will be as focused as I usually am on this subject.
Bye.
 
Now, consider the pax perspective when they show up.... Do the pax want the Deltoid with hat or Bomber Bob?

I don't know, why don't you poll the passengers?

Do the pax want to see Tug Boat Tim in the multi stripped polyester blazer or Aviator Andy in the tailored leather flying jacket?
 
All the folks care about is theyre going to wally world for less than $100! Mickey and Goofy could be in the cockpit and half of them wouldn't care.
 
All the folks care about is theyre going to wally world for less than $100! Mickey and Goofy could be in the cockpit and half of them wouldn't care.
TRUE!

I take professional pride in how I present myself to the public, even if half of them don't care.

It's a personal value set... Not to say the pro-bomber or anti-hat club doesn't have personal values. I've seen sharp-dressed pilots in both, as well as slobs in both.

I personally prefer the "traditional professional pilot" presentation, that's all.

Now, has EVERYONE gone and done their surveys by now?

;)
 
All the folks care about is theyre going to wally world for less than $100! Mickey and Goofy could be in the cockpit and half of them wouldn't care.
Not true;people do look at pilot appearance, even if that's not the determining factor the moment they're purchasing their tickets.the same way we comment about pax dressing code nowadays,pax also comment on our appearance.
A pilot may be a true professional,but with a sloppy look nobody would ever know.
 
I don't know, why don't you poll the passengers?

Do the pax want to see Tug Boat Tim in the multi stripped polyester blazer or Aviator Andy in the tailored leather flying jacket?

It would be beneficial if pilots knew their market.


All the folks care about is theyre going to wally world for less than $100! Mickey and Goofy could be in the cockpit and half of them wouldn't care.

wrong!

A common misconception and ideal pilots like use to justify in their mind their perceived status of the profession by the public.

IOW if we were in the golden age and kids and 20 something girls were impressed by pilots in FULL uniform, you'd bet your hat they'd dress the part...

So...what does that say? Who is determining the profession?


Not true;people do look at pilot appearance, even if that's not the determining factor the moment they're purchasing their tickets.the same way we comment about pax dressing code nowadays,pax also comment on our appearance.
A pilot may be a true professional,but with a sloppy look nobody would ever know.

Excellent points! We complain about how the pax dress but then turn the cheek and say they don't care about how we look....
 
Flying is the new Greyhound. People used to wear suits and dresses. Now they wear sweatpants and flip-flops. Maybe Mickey and Goofy weren't good examples. The folks see two dorks wearing their pilot uniforms and other than that couldn't care less. When's the last time somebody stopped you and said "damn you look so darn professional in that uniform." Half the time they don't know if we're pilots, skycaps, flight attendants, or friggin busdrivers.
 
Just a month ago i was compliment for my appearance by an old couple.they put a smile on my face and i put one on theirs.
Why pilots don't take proud of their personal appearance is beyond me.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top