Superpilot92
LONGCALL KING
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2004
- Posts
- 3,719
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
close to retirement and not even 3000 hours? As a tanker pilot? Got to be one of those losers who got a job as the OGCC's butt boy, and spends more time in the office than in the cockpit. Why else would you have so much time to post on here? You obviously have a hard on for airline pilots. Probably some guy in your squadron who left for the airlines years ago banged your wife.
You sure you're a pilot? Cause you talk a lot like the non rated weenies I knew in the Air Force.
The E-3 is the only jet that the whole rated world looks down on. They tend to attract the absolute last guy to graduate from pilot training. Good job micheal707767, you must have done quite well.
yeah, I did horrible. That's why they FAIPed me.
I usually listen to anyone's opinion, especially on this opinion forum. But, both Tanker Clown and JKE406 bring absolutely nothing to this board, and even I now use ignore, which has blocked out their nonsense. I am sure many people ignore me too, which is fine with me. Serenity NOW!
Bye Bye--General Lee
You must have really impressed your commander when it came time for assignments. What did you do? Why did they punish you? Did you get a DUI?
Almost to retirement and haven't ever flown fighters? Lemme guess, by choice, right? HaHaHaHaHaHa
He was real impressed when I volunteered to take an assignment that other guys had DOS'd over. But I avoided extending my commitment and got out right on schedule. That was all that mattered to me.
Just like AWA and USAir? Most of the people who got canned were management types and ground people, like ticket counter and ramp personel. The two hubs that are likely to have some overlap are MEM and CVG, and we only have 56 daily mainline flights at CVG. MEM is probably the same for NWA mainline flights. There is also a gaping hole on the West Coast, with room to add more of those mainline flights at LAX (gates currently occupied by Expressjet E145s, and currently flying routes to get our name out there). We'll see, but there will have to be something in writing to appease everyone involved, and those could be tied to incentives etc.
Bye Bye--General Lee
Ok now!!!! :erm: ..make sure you are pointedly making fun of tanker clown only....there are some of us that are near retirement and indeed DID turn down fighters.
I thank the gods for the tankers that appeared in my windscreen on stormy nights over the Atlantic or on scary nights over Afghanistan.....I dont applaud this person's sarcasm and desire to pick fights, so he is blocked. You should try it.
I think we have some fairly large accounts in CVG, like Procter and Gamble, and I think we will continue to go to many LARGE US cities and maybe a few INTL ones. As far as all of the current RJ flights? I doubt it. Detroit is right up the street.....
Bye Bye--General Lee
I don't want to see anyone lose jobs but for the merger to actually work there has to be significant efficiency increases. Otherwise, you just put together two big money-losing companies and get one giant money-losing company.
Delta made money in 2007. Unsure about NWA.
I don't want to see anyone lose jobs but for the merger to actually work there has to be significant efficiency increases. Otherwise, you just put together two big money-losing companies and get one giant money-losing company. The whole would actually be worth less than the sum of the parts. If the amount of flying stays about the same the pilots and FA's may be OK but there has got to be a ton of administrative and support departments that will have major overlap after a combination occurs. I can't even imagine that the flying will stay at current levels. Will the combined company maintain all the flying at MEM, DTW, CVG and ATL? If you retain all of these hubs you are just competing with yourself. Part of the purpose of a merger is the reduction of competition.
Also, how many aircraft types will the combined carrier have? This will be a massive inefficiency to maintain training programs, spare parts, tooling and support services and equipment for this many fleet types. Like it or not, the success of this merger depends on the combined operation's ability to concentrate on the parts that make money and shed everything else. They can say what they want but once these companies are combined they will have to cut and cut more to prevent a large-scale trainwreck.
I will never fly fighters because my grades out of Phase II weren't high enough. It would have been neat, but that ship sailed years ago. If I was biter about it, I am over it.
I want to know, did you, or did you not take a pay cut in '03 or '04?
No
I understand that you did well in '07 (I'm sure you had some longevity stuff kick in). But, did you take a pay cut? Let's put it this way. I realize that '07 was your best year....would it have been better if you guys hadn't taken pay cuts?
I don't want to see anyone lose jobs but for the merger to actually work there has to be significant efficiency increases. Otherwise, you just put together two big money-losing companies and get one giant money-losing company.
Delta made money in 2007. Unsure about NWA.
DAL $418 million. NWA, with only %60 of the workforce of DAL, made $764 million.
If there's any heavy lifting to do on the efficiency side of things, I'd say they better eat their grits and get to it.
Nu