Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

NWA-Delta Merger = Very few job cuts

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

patrickdc9

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Posts
48
Most jobs likely to survive a Delta-NWA deal - Star Tribune
By LIZ FEDOR
February 6, 2008

If Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines merge, the vast majority of their
employees would be expected to keep their jobs while the executive ranks of
the combined company would be thinned.

Delta's leaders envision a merger as a way to build their route network, so
they are not contemplating wholesale job cuts, people familiar with Delta's
thinking said Tuesday.

Northwest now employs about 32,000 people -- including 12,000 in
Minnesota -- while Delta has about 55,000 employees.

Delta also understands the importance of keeping a significant presence in
the headquarters city of its merger partner, the sources indicated.

The fate of airline employees could be crucial to helping a merger succeed.

Part of the reason the last major consolidation attempt -- US Airways'
hostile bid for Delta in late 2006 -- failed was that it came with the
threat of major job losses. Then-Delta CEO Gerald Grinstein estimated that
US Airways' plan would have cost 10,000 Delta jobs, and that aspect of the
deal galvanized opposition within the airline and Congress.

Atlanta-based Delta is attempting to construct a merger that could win
support from employees on both sides of the deal. In particular, Delta
believes a merger that paired Delta's strong transatlantic routes with a
carrier that is strong in the Pacific would limit the number of overlapping
routes and allow both partners to form a huge global airline. Consequently,
it could be characterized as a merger by addition rather than subtraction,
when viewed by seat capacity and workforce size.

Delta has approached both Northwest and United Airlines for merger talks,
but is thought to view Northwest as its first choice. Northwest and United
Airlines are the top two U.S. carriers that serve Asia and they both have
major hubs in the Midwest.

Officials from Northwest and Delta have declined to comment on their merger
talks, which continue. In a Jan. 11 message to employees, Northwest CEO
Doug Steenland said the airline's leaders would carefully consider merger
deals. "Doing nothing could be our worst alternative," he said. "If we wait
to react to what others do we could be left with options that are
undesirable or with no options at all."

Pilot groups at Delta and Northwest , both represented by the Air Line
Pilots Association, have said they could support a merger, if it allowed
them to get stock in the new company as well as contract improvements.

"There must be a significant economic benefit to both pilot groups to
provide the incentive to make the hard decisions necessary to integrate
seniority and contracts expeditiously," Northwest pilots chairman Dave
Stevens said in a recent memo to union members.

Northwest pilots spokesman Greg Rizzuto said in an interview that both
pilot groups share the goal of benefiting from a fair merger that would give
them greater job security by forging a stronger carrier.

In a Friday message to employees, Delta CEO Richard Anderson said any merger
would have to serve the "best interests of all Delta stakeholders, including
employees, customers, our shareholders and the communities we serve."
Anderson was Northwest 's chief executive from 2001 to 2004.

One tough issue is the location of the merged company's headquarters. In
mid-November, Anderson said he would only enter into a deal that retained
the Delta name and its Atlanta headquarters.

Northwest has legal agreements with the Metropolitan Airports Commission
that would financially penalize the airline if it fails to maintain a hub
and headquarters in the Twin Cities. "We are pretty darn confident in a
Northwest -Delta merger that the hub plays a strong role," said MAC Chairman
Jack Lanners. However, he added that if Northwest fails to maintain its
headquarters in Minnesota, then the MAC could require it to immediately pay
$245 million in bond debt.

Delta's leaders don't support operating dual headquarters, according to
people with knowledge of Delta's plans. However, if Delta does a deal with
Northwest or another carrier, Delta recognizes that a substantive
commitment should be made to the community that loses its headquarters,
those sources said.

In mid-January, Gov. Tim Pawlenty wrote to Steenland and Anderson to urge
them to "ensure continued operations and presence in Minnesota at a high
level." Pawlenty spokesman Brian McClung said Tuesday that the governor
spoke with Steenland "a couple of times over the past few weeks and we
anticipate discussions may continue as needed." In addition, McClung said
the governor recently talked with Anderson.

U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., said Tuesday that she spoke with Steenland
on Monday about her desire to preserve airline jobs at Minnesota airports,
the Eagan headquarters and Chisholm call center. "He reiterated how
important the [Twin Cities] hub is," Klobuchar said.

Klobuchar reported that Steenland did not brief her on the status of merger
talks, but told her "there was a limited timeline where this could get
done."

In December, Dave Davis, Northwest 's chief financial officer, said that an
airline merger probably would need to take shape by this month to receive a
regulatory decision before the end of the Bush administration.
 
Seems like a lot of talk to get the congressmen in the affected districts to sign off on it....and then once it's said and done, they can do whatever they want.
 
For once, Tanker Clown has a point.

We all know that "synergies" are the reduction of redundancies, mostly employees and the properties they work in.

Speculative investors and managers want this deal. These parties have not bothered to explain any benefit to offset the billions in extra costs; other than NWA is strong in the Pacific and Delta is strong in the Atlantic. These same benefits have already been mined through codeshare agreements and taken one step further in the strategic partnership Delta has with Air France.

Besides, 777 LR's make much of what NorthWest brings to the table redundant anyway. NWA's cargo business is (contrary to what everyone on the board writes) shirinking. NWA's overall capacity is shrinking.

Management is not going to tell employees "Yes, we expect to reduce staffing by 25,000, outsource more and produce less in order to try to drive up prices, screw the consumer and pay our fantastically greedy transactional fees, as well as pay off our friends."

Nope, all will be well for the first couple months. Then pick your threat du' jour, fuel, terrorism, economic malaise and all of a sudden the restructuring (planned over the previous 12 to 24 months) is implemented with no recourse and no remorse.

Regards,
~~~^~~~
 
If Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines merge, the vast majority of their
employees would be expected to keep their jobs while the executive ranks of
the combined company would be thinned.

But I bet their payouts would be very nice!

737
 
Ya gotta love the propaganda mouthpiece for Management.....Ms. Fedor, did you get an "exclusive"???

Stand by for more "MERGER GOOD!!" rhetoric to be written.....
 
Meaningless prediction

Most jobs likely to survive a Delta-NWA deal - Star Tribune
By LIZ FEDOR
February 6, 2008

If Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines merge, the vast majority of their
employees would be expected to keep their jobs while the executive ranks of
the combined company would be thinned.

Delta's leaders envision a merger as a way to build their route network, so
they are not contemplating wholesale job cuts, people familiar with Delta's
thinking said Tuesday.

As the snake said when he fell into the Grand Canyon: "Hmmm. Lotta wiggle room here!" :rolleyes:
 
No Loss of Jobs? B.S.. They have to say that to appease the DOJ. They'll lie to get the deal approved, and out will come the hatchet.
 
No Loss of Jobs? B.S.. They have to say that to appease the DOJ. They'll lie to get the deal approved, and out will come the hatchet.

Just like AWA and USAir? Most of the people who got canned were management types and ground people, like ticket counter and ramp personel. The two hubs that are likely to have some overlap are MEM and CVG, and we only have 56 daily mainline flights at CVG. MEM is probably the same for NWA mainline flights. There is also a gaping hole on the West Coast, with room to add more of those mainline flights at LAX (gates currently occupied by Expressjet E145s, and currently flying routes to get our name out there). We'll see, but there will have to be something in writing to appease everyone involved, and those could be tied to incentives etc.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Just like AWA and USAir? Most of the people who got canned were management types and ground people, like ticket counter and ramp personel. The two hubs that are likely to have some overlap are MEM and CVG, and we only have 56 daily mainline flights at CVG. MEM is probably the same for NWA mainline flights. There is also a gaping hole on the West Coast, with room to add more of those mainline flights at LAX (gates currently occupied by Expressjet E145s, and currently flying routes to get our name out there). We'll see, but there will have to be something in writing to appease everyone involved, and those could be tied to incentives etc.


Bye Bye--General Lee

I agree, first American and TWA, then Airways and America West. When are they going to learn? Somebody always gets the shaft.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top