Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Skywest ALPA OC petitions NMB

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Yep. That's why you see all the pilots at Skywest rushing out the door to apply at ASA, right? No. Wait. They're rushing out the door at ASA to apply at Skywest. I'm so confused. I guess those pilots from ASA who are now flying for Skywest are confused too. They must have come over to Skywest so they could vote to join ALPA again. Right. I understand.

They have been rushing out the door. Anywhere from 20-30 a month are moving on to greener pastures. Don't kid yourself. ALPA we know isn't the magic red pill. It sure beats getting forced to drink the sapa kool-aid year after year. JB and ME are first rate used car salesman and (BH) uncle rico is their owner. Those little bitziches will blow smoke up your inlet if you let them. Kinda sounds like you like the smoke. Step back and ask yourself where you want to be in 20 years. Do you really think whether your at Skywest or not that Sapa is going to truly represent the pilots? It is an organization funded by SGU management. Black and white brother. There is no reading between the lines. VOTE!

LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISORDER!!!
 
! But they don't know all that has been taken away in the last few years. All the changes that the company has made, unilaterally, or with SAPA's consent


Everyone keeps talking about all that has been taken away over the past five years, but no one says what it has been. So can someone tell us new guys what has been lost? Not trying to bash anyone but I think it will help some fence sitters (me being one) decide.
 
! But they don't know all that has been taken away in the last few years. All the changes that the company has made, unilaterally, or with SAPA's consent


Everyone keeps talking about all that has been taken away over the past five years, but no one says what it has been. So can someone tell us new guys what has been lost? Not trying to bash anyone but I think it will help some fence sitters (me being one) decide.

This cut and paste from one of AB's post's should give you an idea.

1: SAPA is funded and therefore controlled by management. Current funding protocol for SAPA violates federal law. This matter will hopefully resolve itself after ALPA is voted in and SAPA becomes irrelevant. Until this happens, what is preventing SAPA from taking the necessary steps to attain autonomy and become a self funded legally recognized representative body for SkyWest pilots?

SAPAs track record during my 9 plus years at this company isn’t inspiring. SAPA failed to accomplish the following:

1: Failed to include our Bro pilots in the 1% pay increase.

2: Failed to implement Zoltar and SEP for pilots.

3: Failed to implement a pilot specific policy manual that is not trumped by the Company Policy Manual.

4: Failed to get management to agree to durable language to protect our seniority in the event of a merger or acquisition.

5: EB members usurp the authority of the democratically elected president. (Mark Nolin)

6: Failed to stop management from reversing its new cancelled leg pay policy. (57 pics will be paid but the practice will continue.) This is their (management’s) version of resolving this issue. We have not received any new information regarding this pen stroke policy except for the sound bite “we are continuing discussion with Brad regarding this matter.”

7: Failed to reverse the implementation of the reserve bucket system.

8: Failed to live up to the documented promise of backing any pilot who refused to fly the CRJ700/900 at 50-seat pay scale.

9: Failed to do anything about the seniority abrogation that resulted from the pen stroke Forced Bid Protocol.

10: Failed to resolve the HCE 401K issue affecting our senior pilots.

11: Failed to reverse the pen stroke policy of no pay for new hires during training back in 2003.

12: Failed to do anything about the slashing of our uniform allowance.

13: Failed to do anything about the new requirement for new hires to purchase their Jepp plates or to double up in hotel rooms during training.

14: Failed to obtain clarification from management regarding Klen Brokes e-mail threatening disciplinary actions against pilots who bust altitudes even though they completed a ASAP report.

15: PBS aka Pilots Being Screwed.

Every time there is a Union drive our pilots receive empty promises like some of the ones listed above from management and from well meaning SAPA reps who believe that they can make a difference. The drive fails, promises are broken and it’s back to business as usual, until the next Union drive. I think we all appreciate the work our SAPA reps do on our behalf. What we must acknowledge is that our SAPA reps are at a tactical disadvantage because they lack the tools, resources and leverage to provide a pilot group of this size with adequate representation.
 
if you look at Mesa, ASA, Comair, AWAC, etc., and say to yourself 'I wish our company, culture, general attitude, present condition and future prospects were more like those guys,' then by all means, vote ALPA. after all, we can only hope to attain here what history shows can been attained elsewhere using ALPA. and even if we somehow are able to equal those places (which would be a degression IMHO) on our first contract after 5 or however many years, what is the cost? beyond losing the 5 years?

ALPA will not magically transform us, or any other, into a unified group. all ALPA can guarantee is that it will collect dues and try it's (our) best. the results are there for anyone to see.

the alternative is to stay with what we've done, which though far from perfect, has attained a certain result. this result is, in my opinion, better than what I experienced elsewhere and what I observe elsewhere. the arguments that things have degraded here are valid. if you believe that this is purely the result of corporate greed and that by voting in ALPA you will somehow FORCE them to share more of the pie, to accept your demands, and allow you to dictate the them, then vote ALPA.

if, however, you are a realist, and you look around and realize that the changes that have occurred industry wide are the result more of a ever changing and ever more competitive market, then don't willfully hang the millstone about the neck of our company. if you realize that the industry has and will to continue to suffer through changes, but that we've fared much better than most, then don't place the stumbling block in the way of our company pushing forward to remain competitive. if you feel like what we have at SkyWest is unique, enjoyable, and you want to maintain that, then don't shackle our competitive abilities with leg irons that once installed can never be removed.

study it out, weigh the alternatives, look at results.
 
reno,

now put up the list of ALPA 'failures' at the regionals so we can compare.
 
I'll add one more. Skywest is self-insured, which means that UHC, and IHC are merely plan administrators. They pay out what Skywest directs them to. While the company continues to make record profits, insurance premiums have gone up, while coverage declines.
 
the arguments that things have degraded here are valid. if you believe that this is purely the result of corporate greed and that by voting in ALPA you will somehow FORCE them to share more of the pie, to accept your demands, and allow you to dictate the them, then vote ALPA.

YOU are the only one who makes this stupid argument. NOBODY on the pro-ALPA side has suggested that a union will force the company to do anything. You bring up this false argument over and over so that you can smash it down. But it's YOUR F'N ARGUMENT!!!!

A contract needs to be put in place so that the company is legally held to our agreement. They would be unable to arbitrarily and unilaterlly:

1. Change the cancelled legs policy.

2. Not pay deadheads by scheduled block, and instead pay historical credit. They then argue that since they have ALWAYS paid historical credit, they will continue even though the policy manual says "SCHEDULED BLOCK" (almost always higher since we adjusted the block times a few months ago.)

3. Implement PBS (which is OK for some and bad for others. Either way, it is a BIG win for management and the pilots should have shared in the savings.)

4. Implementation of the bucket system. This is a HUGE loss for reserves and a HUGE win for the company. Again, a union would have sat down with the company and said "OK, you want this, what do we get in return?"

That's all I can think of off the top of my head.
 
Some people can't live without a union, others are anti union to the core. You can't convince those people of anything, however, the majority are in the middle. Sadly, we have seen the damage tha SAPA has done to this pilot group.

Some representatives are well meaning, but powerless, those come and go. Others jump at management's commands, and try to convince the pilot group that its the right thing to do. Whatever we do, SAPA has to go!
 
I used to be a republican and anti-union. I blame Bush/Cheney for turning me into a Democrat and SAPA for turning me pro-union.
 
ASA has been negotiating for 5 YEARS, and in the end will probably get a lesser version of what we already have.

haters, start your engines!!!!!!!!

10% Nh, introduce fuel, here I go...

Yeah I guess ASA should have agreed to a concessionary TA back in 2003 just to get'er done. Instead they are looking at at least a 1% increase on their 70 seater rates (and not some BHO scam either), and RETRO PAY, and contractual language on how PBS is implemented and operated. Oh, and could ya do me a favor and answer the following...

If you were involved in an accident or an incident would you want ALPA or SAPA representing you?

If you had issues with your medical would you want ALPA or SAPA representing you?

If you busted a checkride or PC would you want ALPA or SAPA representing you?

If the current management personnel at SkyWest were to change (actually happening as we speak) would you want ALPA or SAPA representing you?

If a crewmember or passenger injured themselves onboard your aircraft would you want ALPA or SAPA representing you?

If we were to merge seniority lists with ASA would you want ALPA or SAPA representing you?

SAPA elections have a 50% voter turnout. Who would better able to unify the SkyWest pilot group ALPA or SAPA?

Do you like working 5 and 6 days in a row, with only two days off in between, it happens every month with PBS to junior and senior crewmembers alike. Who would be better suited to address scheduling issues, ALPA or SAPA?

I hate paying 150 bucks a month for car and homeowners insurance, but what if?

How much is your ATP or Commercial certificate worth to you? ALPA may not get me a raise? but 2% is cheap career insurance.

Fly Safe!!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top