grog_sit_reserv
Crashcave Lounger
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2003
- Posts
- 1,070
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree with Whiskey, yet again.
Somethings up.
FDJ--Wall Street IS what makes public policy--if it's in their interest.
Mayby PCl 128 could just write a check to the east side and score a cool jet job
Therein lies your problem!! Now from current rep to former rep, have you even bothered to read the ENTIRE award?? All of the protection were contained within the award itself. You seem to be one of those who fails to understand the real difference between longevity and seniority further as a former rep you should also know merger policy and that in 1991 Date of hire was removed!! Further, you should know and fully understand all of the dynamics of this unique case and why the ruling came down as it did.
Now how can the UAL, NWA and the DAL merger committees all state that given all of the information they conclude that the award is fair yet you as a former rep never having even read the entire award feel justified in your assessment that it violates section 45???
WD`
So in your little dream world how would you combine the lists? (this should be interesting)
Exactly how is this outside of his responsibilities? "Maintain Career expectations" is in ALPA Policy but it's never defined. In other words, it's open to interpretation. Policy makes the duly agreed-to arbitrator qualifed to make that interpretation. You can disagree with Nicolau's decision but to claim he acted improperly requires some concrete evidence. Nobody other than the AAA MEC (and I guess you) thinks the Nic Award is improper. No judge will ever question it, I guarantee you.I disagree with Nic's decision to use his crystal ball to determine the career expectations of the East pilots by determining that USAir would have liquidated had the West not come along. Making such a determination is outside of his responsibilities.
TC, you pessimist. My rational presence alone should be able to stabilize things here. Of course if it doesn't I'm stuck with going back to AA and the risk of being paired with you again. Let's hopes things work out...The anger in both groups tore that airline apart. I was only there for one year but it was miserable. I see the same scenario for the AWA/USAir groups once they are combined.
Exactly how is this outside of his responsibilities?
Grog:
Just don't drop your keys in front of him!:blush: :laugh:
Its funny listening to him about the "apparent toast" of Us Airways.
Why don't you ask him about when the Air Wisconsin pilots' money was stollen and invested in USAir first so AWAC pilots should be above seniority of all AWA pilots and the fact that it wasn't AWA that swooped to the rescue. It was AWAC/EASTSHORE AVIATION!
737
I've read most of the award. I disagree with Nic's decision to use his crystal ball to determine the career expectations of the East pilots by determining that USAir would have liquidated had the West not come along. Making such a determination is outside of his responsibilities. He shouldn't be using "what if" scenarios to determine career expectations of the East pilots.
I'm fully award of current merger policy and the lacking of DOH. I'm not even saying that DOH should have been the way to go in this case. Far from it. However, Nic awarded a windfall to the West pilots by not putting appropriate fences in place on this award.
It's obvious that you haven't read the Award fully or carefully. I wish I could cut and paste it but my version of Acrobat won't convert to text. I typed this quote from page 25, after Nic summarized both sides' proposals:He isn't qualified to determine whether USAir would have survived without Parker.