Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your beloved Democratic Obama NMB? Say it ain't so comrade...
Having negotiated in front of the NMB myself, there is no way it was rushed because of that single issue....The NMB can't rush it anyway...You know that...
The NMB has 3 options:
1. Release
2. Park (recess)
3. Continue negotiations
They cannot rush the negotiations as you imply.
I agreed with the NMB. Arguing over this issue when everything else had been TA'd was ridiculous.
PCL_128 said:Take a look at #2, Joey. That's what was going to happen if they kept pushing back on the dual qual issue. When you get threatened with being parked after 5 years of bargaining, you start to move quickly.
There is no way that was the only open issue at the end, unless ALPA had already caved on the other issues...
Pay and workrules are far behind the ASA negotiated pay and workrules that were negotiated under a Bush Republican NMB...Now you want me to believe that a Democratic Obama NMB was harder on PNCL....sorry, I don't buy it...
That is what happened at ASA both in 1998, and in 2007....What happened when ASA was parked? Watching you do the "ALPA two step" is entertaining if nothing else...."Obama's going to fix things"...."The new Democratic NMB is going make life better"...."We are going to 'take it back'"....
How's the industry leading contract at Air Tran coming?
I disagree with the "safety" argument...The instructors do it....Mesa does it...Are you implying that our line pilots aren't as good as the instructors or Mesa pilots? I'm flying the 200 now. I would have no problem getting in an ATR today. When I'm off I fly a C172, a Twin Comanche, and a Bonanza...Is that safe?
It was indeed. Everything else was settled a couple of months ago. They finished up scope back then, and suddenly the company decided that dual qual was a major concern for them, even though they had never brought it up before. They bickered over the minutiae of dual qual for all this time, and finally came to a reasonable compromise.
PCL_128 said:Most of the work rules were TA'd way back when I was still on the MEC. We TA'd the scheduling section in early '07, still two years before we would finally be rid of Shrub. As far as pay, it really isn't that far off from ASA rates, from what I hear.
PCL_128 said:The Obama NMB is doing a great job, actually. Unfortunately, you can't undo what was done while Shrub was still running things.
Wow, you truly are a sky GOD! All that experience and yet, still stuck at ASA?
I bet you could sue 60,000 ALPA members a the wave of a simple wand!
You go girl!
I can't get the "wind check" part down...and I'm really confused about when to ask how long the final is...I guess I'm just not mainline material....
I hear some Delta pilots actually fly military airplanes in addition to their big airliner....How do they do that so safely...They must be really good....Us regional guys can only hope to half as good someday...
So PCL settled for less than ASA a few months ago....Got it....So much for "taking it back" and the Messiah fixing all that is wrong....I'm not surprised, but I know quite a few ALPA cheerleaders that are shaking their heads in dis-belief now.
I see a PCL contract negotiated with an Obama NMB that undercuts an ASA contract negotiated with a Bush NMB...then I see an ALPA cheerleader blame everything on Bush and Skywest....
, but that they get all of the benefits that unionized carriers negotiate without contributing a dime to the cause. .
I'm certainly not "shaking my head in dis-belief," but I am somewhat disappointed. I think they could have done better with more MEC oversight of the entire process, but that's just my opinion.
PCL_128 said:PCL negotiated their contract almost completely during the Bush years. ASA was negotiating from a much better starting point, without needing to fix so many work rules. Again, PCL had to fix something as basic as block-or-better, while you guys could focus more on details.
PCL_128 said:As far as Skywest, I haven't blamed Skywest for anything. My criticism of Skywest isn't that they drag down the industry, but that they get all of the benefits that unionized carriers negotiate without contributing a dime to the cause. I could never say that they drag anything down, because quite frankly, Jerry is so petrified of having ALPA on the Skywest property that he gives them good pay and work rules just to prevent it.
So what is the incentive for Skywest to unionize? According to you, they get milk without buying the cow...If they buy the cow, they may not get all the milk....That doesn't seem like a great sales pitch to me....
There is pressure on all of us DCI carriers to get costs down...It was a factor in this TA.
So what is the incentive for Skywest to unionize?
I'm not repeating it for the thousandth time, Joey. You know what the reasons are.