"With you"

[XJohXJ]

Batter UP!

 

[Goose Egg]

http://www.avweb.com/news/sayagain/192912-1.html

That one talks about phraseology, but we have bigger problems to worry about these days. I'd call myself a pretty standard radio operator, but it's funny to me how some people get their panties all riled up about a few words extra.

After a perusal of the correct article, it turns out that I'm a pretty "standard" radio guy as well. The difference is I am "standard" because I just feel like its easier and more efficient. I get the feeling that other people are "standard" because they actually get a thrill out of being sticklers about things. There's a world of difference between a guy like me and a guy like them.

And if someone doesn't keep it exactly how the AIM says it, I'm not going to freak out. Nobody should freak out.

See yaaaa!

P.S. Just for the record, the guys that are the worst with phraseology, IMO, are the mainline airline guys. Everyone else seems to do pretty well.

P.P.S. But it's nothing I'm going to freak about.

 

[Ezralite]

Professional pilots sound like student pilots when they use "with you" in their initial transmissions to ATC. Here's a clue -- ATC knows you are "with them" by the fact you are talking to them! It's redundant and a waste of radio time....especially the stupid "checking in with you". Try dropping the "with you" crap and sound a bit more professional and like you've flown in other parts of the world. Next time you hear "with you" consider how stupid it sounds....and is. It's just a bad habit.

Also...drop the "Any chance..." when what you really meant to do is request something. i.e. "Comair 123 requesting direct xyz".

Jag. Have fun going 80 times the speed of sound, "Mach 80".

 

[135fr8r]

Tell ya what Mach, and I think I speak for us all. Next time any of us wants to hear something from an a**hole, I'll just fart.

 

[MusicMan]

You're just a 'doosh' for deviating from the Pilot/Controller glossary and jeopardizing the safety of yourself, your passengers, and everyone else in the airspace around you.

If you're going to be up in arms about accuracy and such things, you should pick up a dictionary. It's d0uche, not doosh. Glass houses and all that crap!

 

[regionalcap]

I'll tell you what is SAD. This guy has started this exact thread 3 years straight.

 

[Hollywood82]

I'll tell you what is SAD. This guy has started this exact thread 3 years straight.

Who does he fly for?

 

[SplitBar]

I can live with "With You", However, PLEASE don't call 16,000 "Flight Level 160" or don't call FL280 "Twenty Eight Thousand"

 

[CRJ puppy]

Hello center.

Just checkin in with you after over a year of thread inactivity.

Isnt resurrection a beautiful thing?

see,
YAAAAAAAAAAAA

 

[regionalcap]

Hello center.

Just checkin in with you after over a year of thread inactivity.

Isnt resurrection a beautiful thing?

see,
YAAAAAAAAAAAA

Do a search on "with you"? This guy started a "new" thread back in June that is exactly like this old thread. It gets confusing on which thread is the "new" thread.

 

[Crossky]

One situation where saying 'with you' to ATC is acceptable is after center tells you to 'change to my frequency xxx.xx'. "Anal Air ABC with you on xxx.xx"

Using proper frequency, altitude, speed and heading pronounciation is much more important than using a second to throw in a mild salutation such as 'with you' or 'checking in'.

 

[Father Jack]

One situation where saying 'with you' to ATC is acceptable is after center tells you to 'change to my frequency xxx.xx'. "Anal Air ABC with you on xxx.xx"

Just don't do that in Australia!

 

[Hollywood82]

You are the one trying to argue with the AIM. But I guess if all the guys at the majors do it, that makes it professional.

I can see why people shorten or substitute phrases to save time. Four point six vs four thousand six hundred is a great example. I do it too from time to time. Thats not the topic of this thread.

Continue viewing the AIM as optional and it will eventually bite you in the ass.

Sounds like you view it as optional.

The point is not whether these phrases are normal or common.

Actually that is the exact point I’m trying to make.

I wish phraseology was part of checkrides. Theres countless accidents/incidents were standard phraseology was not used.

Sounds like you’re reaching, find one accident that that was caused by someone using “with you”, or “4.6”. You can’t. There is no such accident. Quit trying to be dramatic.

The point is that all these things are written in the AIM for a reason. Safety. Take shortcuts for speed, or to "sound professional" (even though you sound completely opposite) and there will eventually be a miscommunication. With enough miscommunication you will eventually have an accident.

I can see why people shorten or substitute phrases to save time. Four point six vs four thousand six hundred is a great example. I do it too from time to time. Thats not the topic of this thread.

You’re just a big hypocrite.

I'm proud to have attended ERAU.

enough said

 

[Hamburger]

Have fun going 80 times the speed of sound, "Mach 80".

Burn!

 

[Hollywood82]

Evidently you spend time thinking about other men's genitals.

This comming from a man who's ratings are "A$$ Master"? Whos a$$ are you a master of highsky?