After reading all these replys and comments I must add my thoughts.
First my background.
I have been in this business since 1951. I've had an instrument rating since 1953. My structured flying was in the USAF. That was 278 hours in Aviation Cadets, the Korean War was on. After 8 years in the USAF I separated and got an airline job...in DC-3's. I was lucky, no one was hiring. Three mergers later I retired at age 60. That is a long story cut short. <grin>
My observation is that good pilots come from all the routes...and so do bad ones.
Trying to determine which is which from job applications, resume's, cover letters and letters of recommendation is hit or miss.
The interview process is flawed too, but does help.
Training records probably are the most reliable. We seldom consider anybody with a record of failures. One failure, maybe, is not fatal, but a string of them is an obvious problem. Repeating a checkride for, say, your instrument rating when you were a wee pup would not be as bad as failing an upgrade at a previous employer.
I do know that some of out fleet managers read Flightinfo. Lucky that it is anonymous, some of the stuff here would really be like licking the third rail, deadly.
I am frequently shocked by the crude language and innuendo frequently displayed here. Some is bravado, I'm sure, but the underlying tone is all to frequently not very flattering toward the profession. I realize that the profession is under stress right now. People handle stress differently. If you do not like it, please find some other profession before you hurt somebody.
Our DO recently remarked that the new classes will be handled differently in that the first year IS probationary and if we do not like what we see there will be discharges before the 1st year is over. He is tired of keeping problem people and havng those problems for 30 years.
Thanks for listening <grin>
~DC