Thermaldog
Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
- Posts
- 7
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
John,
You really think they will take a pay cut? I am not disagreeing with you, I am just wondering where you think they would take a pay cut. For their union drive, I do know that in Chicago (according to a skywest captain), it is going very strong there.
I find it interesting that so many people claim that as soon as ASA's negotiations fail that SkyWest will have paycuts imposed.
They will take a pay cut if the ALPA drive fails.
How then do you explain why we didn't have a paycut imposed PRE-owning ASA?
And quit whining about our 70-for-50 seat rates and the 900. We get paid more than many regionals, less than some... on an hourly basis. Many, many SkyWesters have argued that our overall compensation and QOL overrides that fact.
I have yet to meet an ALPA supporter here who has a convincing argument for why we should vote it on property.
The pay issue doesn't fly; you guys have been waiting longer for a contract than we have for a raise. The "handshake" agreement argument? I have seen almost as many complaints on this board about ASA's management violating the contract than complaints from people who don't work for us about our blended jet rate. Legal for medical issues and terminations and such?
Okay, maybe... but I find it ironic that the ALPA pen and sticker-toters are often the least compliant with dress code and standards and show times. More than one member of the ALPA drive has been fired and re-hired by SkyWest.
The drive isn't going that well west of ORD. Maybe ALPA should take a couple more million from it's strike contingency fund to pay for recruitment (like it claimed it has in the last piece of unsolicited propaganda it sent me). Sorry, I just want to show up and do my job, until you can show me that life is vastly superior at your airline with ALPA, I'll keep my 2%.
So what will happen when SkyWest is one of the few regionals left? Who is going to be there to prop up your QOL and payrates? Those are some of the things you need to think about.
One of the things that I wouldn't like about being a SkyWest pilot is you are being used to break another pilot group. A lot of your newhires are making comments to ASA pilots about how they are going to take all of the 70's and anything else that SkyWest Inc will get. That doesn't say to much about your pilot group in my opinion.
I have said all along that we need to work together, SkyWest and ASA pilots. What are you doing to make that happen?
I figured I was going to get flamed eventually for what I said, so I removed it, but I will respond to your comments.
I can't speak for what some ill-bred moron allegedly spouts off inappropriately (hey, that applies to this board sometimes, too!), but I agree that it's wrong for any of our pilots to rejoice in your or any other airline's situation... I'd be surprised if this is even happening or happening on more than an isolated basis. But regardless, it's wrong.
That being said, I don't agree with your allegation that we are being used to break your pilot group. Your contract dispute started way before SkyWest acquired you. Your profitability comes from the contract negotiated with Delta, not from how well your airline is run or is performing, just like ours does. You have a single mainline codeshare, we spread our risk out by having two... and neither of them are exactly raking in the dough. Therefore, there is always a certain amount of risk involved in asking for a raise.
JA has always told our company that our success is based upon the goodwill of our mainline partners and what we can provide them.
Why your company doesn't give you a raise? Since I only get to see snippets of what's going on over there amid all the sniping, I can't tell what the company's real stance is and where your union stands. As far as I can tell, the biggest issue seems to be how big a raise you get, if I'm wrong, you guys need to do some damage control, because you aren't being perceived well from the outside. Maybe that doesn't matter to you, but if you're asking us to "help you out" and vote in a union, it sure does matter to us. And btw, United constantly shifts our flying back and forth with Mesa. As far as I know, we're not getting into a playground dispute with them over "our" flying.
ALPA NATIONAL will spend alot of money if ALPA fails at skywest, and they take our airplanes and our flights, that will generate a SCAB list. So for career move for the skywest pilots might just be the left seat at SKywest,,,and thats all folks !!!!
ALPA NATIONAL will spend alot of money if ALPA fails at skywest, and they take our airplanes and our flights, that will generate a SCAB list. So for career move for the skywest pilots might just be the left seat at SKywest,,,and thats all folks !!!!
ALPA NATIONAL will spend alot of money if ALPA fails at skywest, and they take our airplanes and our flights, that will generate a SCAB list. So for career move for the skywest pilots might just be the left seat at SKywest,,,and thats all folks !!!!
Being non-union does not equate to being a scab.
Also perhaps more importantly...I like SKW because of LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION. I can promise you that I would never, ever bid anything east of denver, for any amount of money, and a lot of guys here share my attitude. So with that being said, how would the seniority integration work?
I would need absolute assurance of an equitable list merger plan. DOH is not an option, It would have to be one-for-one thing kind of thing with some sort of fences. My personal life cannot deal with relocation to ATL.
Real easy. DOH + fences to prevent anybody from being displaced. This is a pretty common provision in a merger. Then in 2 or 3 years the fences come down and any pilot can bid any vacancy that their senority can hold. Nobody would lose their seat or current base, the only thing that would be affected would be future positions.
People on this board seem to have some sort of phobia that DOH will mean they'd lose their base and get displaced to ATL. That would not be a fair merger at all! But DOH needs to be a condition of the merger, otherwise the ASA pilots will get hosed even more then they're currently being hosed.
So, instead of getting displaced now, a large number of SkyWest pilots would be displaced in 2-3 years time, when the fences come down and all the more senior ASA pilots based on DOH bid out of ATL. It's no wonder that no one at Skywest wants to merge, in fact I can't think of anything positive that a merger with ASA could offer. All the new hires at Skywest (many hundreds) would be screwed if DOH were to be implemented.
Good point. Nor does it equate to you being stupid, uninformed, too new to know any better, or naive.
Spicepilots,
just relax. don't you know that pilots at other airlines know how things at SkyWest work better than we do? Don't you know that they have a magic ALPA pin that they rub and it tells them the future? Don't you know that we have had it good for 30 plus years but now we're screwed?
flame on boys, flame on........