Terry Hunter
Silence!
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2004
- Posts
- 297
BoilerUP said:... If TSH did not exist in 2003, and was therefore not a threat to TSA ALPA, how honest is it to fault the union leadership and pilot group for failing to protect themselves against an unknown entity?
If I am wrong and TSH *did* in fact exist in 2000 (or 2003) and the MEC failed to secure Holding Company flying, then yes there is some blame for them to bear. If TSH didn't exist then, one can't reasonably fault the union for failing to protect against a threat (holding company) that didn't exist.
I see what your saying, but a rock-solid scope is protected by buy-outs, mergers or acquistions for the future after a contract is signed. I am not exactly sure, but I believe "successorship" is the section that comes into play for preserving the scope for the chance that your company is bought by another.