what the hell "sapa"

[CoAlpha]

so our pres of sapa says no meeting and some clown, says meeting in on. jesus these guys really dont understand that if this is kept up they might have to go back to flying the line.

 

[WateryGrave]

so our pres of sapa says no meeting and some clown, says meeting in on. jesus these guys really dont understand that if this is kept up they might have to go back to flying the line.

Care to take another stab at that one???

 

[CoAlpha]

Care to take another stab at that one???

if you were in the know you would know what i was talking about, so no. there is no reason for "another stab" needed.

take care

 

[XPOO]

CoAlpha,

I'm no biologist, but you look to be a sloth. If that's the case, don't worry, no one expected you to get off your lazy ass in the first place and go through the proper channels to finding the answer to your question.

 

[No.W.]

There are no good answers to his question.

 

[Weasil]

I have to agree with coalpha,

"What the hell SAPA?"

The pilots of Skywest recently elected a new President to our "association". After the management installed, non-line pilot (no medical) secretary (who depends on sapa for an income) testified in court that he thinks he is the administrative head of SAPA, the duly elected President sent out a letter to the pilots saying that this had happened, and that the next SAPA meeting is cancelled. Well 9 of the SAPA board have decided to go ahead with the meeting anyway while 10 are standing by the President (at least that's how it looks right now).

There are threats of recalls of these reps, and a poll on the sapa website shows overwhelming support for a recall election. This is getting very interesting.

 

[BoilerUP]

Recalling what reps? The ones standing with the President, or the "company men"?

 

[Ben Dover]

class action lawsuit?

So here's what I'm wondering. If/when the court rules that SAPA is illegal, isn't the next logical step for someone (OC or some other disaffected pilot)to file a class action lawsuit for back pay?

Think about it, if the court rules against the existence of SAPA then isn't it basically saying management has been negotiating with ITSELF all of these years rather than negotiating with the pilots.

 

[Bluto]

The recent pay vote fiasco is clear evidence that any "negotiations" between mgmt. and the pilot group were simply a show. When the pilot group refused a ridiculous pay proposal, mgmt simply stopped negotiations and moved on.

 

[Steveair]

I found it interesting ALPA is suing to suspend the SAPA program. Pretty dirty trick. Take away all representation so pilot's are forced to vote in ALPA. Great organization there... nice to see they're trying to screw us already.

 

[Blucher]

I found it interesting ALPA is suing to suspend the SAPA program. Pretty dirty trick. Take away all representation so pilot's are forced to vote in ALPA. Great organization there... nice to see they're trying to screw us already.

Let me get this straight. You guys have been lied to by a corrupt system for years now, and it's ALPA's fault for exposing the lie? You know, you could always just vote in the Teamsters. ALPA ain't the only game in town.

-Blucher

 

[Bluto]

Recalling what reps? The ones standing with the President, or the "company men"?

Company men.
Recent events suggest at best, a group severely out-of-touch with the pilot group, and at worst a group with some very serious conflicts of interest.

 

[Lilah]

Talked with MN yesterday, and kudos to him for calling it the way he sees it !! He's making this non-union person seriously reconsider his position.

It's interesting how SWOL doesn't list him at all. Go SWOL-Crewmember-Crewinfo-SAPA/SIA and see for yourself!

Both sides are crooked in my own opinion. ME's letter (today) seems to imply if management is forced to cut off money for SAPA, it would cease to exist. Well, if management pays for SAPA, wouldn't it seem to act in (management's) best interest, or they wouldn't pay for it?

Cheers!

 

[Ben Dover]

So here's what I'm wondering. If/when the court rules that SAPA is illegal, isn't the next logical step for someone (OC or some other disaffected pilot)to file a class action lawsuit for back pay?

Think about it, if the court rules against the existence of SAPA then isn't it basically saying management has been negotiating with ITSELF all of these years rather than negotiating with the pilots.

If you think about it. What's to stop pilots from some OTHER airline from filing a class action lawsuit against the company claiming that SAPAs illegal existence has depressed wages industry wide? Essentially making every regional pilot part of the "class" in class action.

 

[SkyNation]

MN is a sort-of 'trojan horse' for the ALPA drive, albeit a poorly disguised one. Anyone who has talked to him should have known that before voting for him. I like him a lot, but I knew that if elected his agenda was to install ALPA by whatever means he could. We differ in what we feel best serves this pilot group.

This should serve as a reminder that they don't have the support to just hold the stupid vote and move on with things. This is a way to 'end around' the process by de-certifying SAPA.

just hold the vote! then we can move beyond this nonsense. and if ALPA is voted in, we can start our clock ticking away the years until anything changes.