Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

What might the bottom of AAL and LCC SLI look like

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
From above, the part that needs to be looked at again:

"I want all pilots at US Airways and American Airlines to be treated fairly in the seniority process. You could make a valid argument that it is hypocritical to say that APA would not treat us fairly if they solely represented us in seniority talks but USAPA could fairly represent the West in the same talks. I get it, but the Nicolau Award presents a different dynamic. Given the chance to stand before an arbitration panel as a full participant and present their case to implement the Nic, or a close substitute based on the argument that it was previously awarded by an arbitrator, is a potentially career ending chance that we cannot accept. Although we have won numerous court cases rejecting the Nic, arbitration is different and uncertain. The rules of law that apply to the decision making process of courts do not apply to arbitration."




Yup, he knows that the NIC could be reinstated, and there are risks. (Like the first arbitration they agreed to. Uhhhhhh, duh!!!)



Jackholes!!


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Easy answer, a JCBA was required to institute the NIC. this never happened. So NIC was never used or put into effect....

Think a Judge recently ruled on whether the NIC had to be used in the MOU, but I could be mistaken.


Via a post from APC concerning the NIC award....

From a 2007 article:

"The Tempe, Ariz.-based airline has struggled to merge its pilot groups following America West Airlines' acquisition of the former US Airways in 2005. Pilots from both carriers have been trying to hammer out a joint contract, but those who were with the original US Airways recently walked away from the negotiating table, demanding immediate pay raises before they return."



Bye Bye---General Lee
 
So, signatures don't matter? Did your MEC leader, Parker, and the West leader sign on the dotted line first? You're saying the lawyers all got it wrong?? Sure... So, tell that to the first three arbitrators (the ones meeting with the AWA party) and then the second three, that their work (like NIC's award) doesn't count.... This is gonna be fun....


Bye Bye---General Lee


sure signatures matter, the signatures on the T/A which controlled the timelines of our merger. Now if you read that T/A (which D and U learned from) It states that the arbitrated award will not be in effect until a JCBA is negotiated.

Soooooooo the NIC sits there waiting on a JCBA between East/West. Where is it? As soon as it comes forth we can start using the NIC.

Keep going though 'cause AA came in and complicated things. Now there's a MOU which all sides agreed that previous agreements are gone and no longer in effect. That meant stuff like a JCBA between east and west is not going to happen. AOL sued saying it was a DFR for USAPA to negotiate a change and not include the NIC award. I believe a judge agreed with USAPA, and even stated that USAPA had a legitimate union purpose to negotiate away the original T/A that included the NIC.


Now for the AA guys that might scan through this, a question for you. With the NIC, Every West pilot can hold Capt. So if that is the list used to merger with AA, then instead of 2500 capts, there are 3300 capts. I.E. relative position should place every West F/O above EVERY AA F/O.

Sounds fair right?
 
GL has 14 of 33 posts on this thread...
 
sure signatures matter.....

(Removed for brevity)

Now for the AA guys that might scan through this, a question for you. With the NIC, Every West pilot can hold Capt. So if that is the list used to merger with AA, then instead of 2500 capts, there are 3300 capts. I.E. relative position should place every West F/O above EVERY AA F/O.

Sounds fair right?

I can't help but notice you failed to call the attention of the AA pilots to the fact that since every West pilot could theoretically hold Captain, then every East pilot on the property (*not on furlough) at the time of the AWA/USAirways merger can ALSO hold captain. By utilizing the "union" to run the company as two separate entities, USAirway allowed junior pilots to upgrade WAY out of order.

Damn you, AWA first officers, for insisting that USAPA keep you stuck on the bottom of a stagnant list while junior pilots on the East were "forced" to upgrade!

Is that really the argument you're trying to make to appeal to the AA pilots? Really?
 
Last edited:
General Lee- stay in your own yard. You have an opinion and feel like you have to share everything on here. We are tired of your drivel. Shhhh!!!!
Hush it! You don't know what your talking about and don't understand the east west fight at all. It takes two to tango and the west is just as much if not more to blame for this mess. Leave us all alone!
 
This site would be much better off if a certain group of trolls were banned.

Thanks Vladamir Putin! Ban everyone who speaks out... Everyone who brings up valid points contradicting your idiotic thoughts is a troll..... Riiiight....



Bye Bye---General Lee
 

Latest resources

Back
Top