You are just wrong. I have never had a Rolex or Omega fail. I use Swiss autowinders because of their reliability.
Sorry, I've heard too many swiss watch owners speak of repairs to thier watches to buy the notion that they never fail. Perhaps you have had very good experience with yours, as you claim. That's nice, but you completely and utterly miss the point. My bad for making it obliquely and assuming others could follow.
Heres the point: Even if we accept the notion that an expensive swiss watch is completely and utterly, 100% failure proof, for all of eternity, so what? Ordinary human beings (pilots even) are virtually never in a position where the failure of thier wrist jewelry if of any real consequence. Remember, I was responding to Swass's silly claim that a battery failure in a quartz watch would cause serious problems, thus making a swiss chronometer a necessity. Whether it's your timex ironman or your Swiss choronometer that fails, you can easily get the time by looking at the MFD, (please don't tell me that Gulfstream forgot to give you a means of telling time in the G-V) checking your cell phone, twisting a single knob on the KLN89b (if you're stuck in the last century) or asking your co-pilot. It's just
not going to leave you in dire straits.
Even if you intentionally placed yourself in a situation where accurate time was critical; say you're sailing around the world, and making it a point of pride to navigate solely by astronomic means, not using GPS, or even using the time capabilities of a GPS receiver, and even eschewing using a broadcast time standard, you would still be far better off by taking three $50 quartz watches and a supply of batteries than a $4500 chonometer, as the time from the quartz watches would be much more accurate, and the redundancy would provide much more reliability. (3 watches would provide cross checking with a tie-breaker when one started to lose time)
I just bought a new Rolex GMT Master to replace one I had worn for 20 years, not because it had ever failed, but because I liked the new style better. I got $2500 for my old one so it didn't cost me anything to own it. I suspect that when the time comes to sell my current Rolex, I will have no trouble getting the $4500 back that I paid for it.
Ahhh, I see that you aren't any better at finance than you are at deciphering indirect commumication.
OK, first off $2500 today isn't worth anywhere near $2500, 20 years ago. If you use the Bureau of Labor statistics' Consumer Price Index, you'll find that it's worth about $1359, so right off the bat you've lost $1141. Now, having your money tied up in a wach has a cost. It used to be that oppotunity cost was one of those things they taught in the first week of freshman economics, don't they do that any more? If you had invested that $2400 in a mutual fund which showed an average return of 8% PA, the value of the mutual fund now would be $12,317, so without mixing in your loss due to inflation, it cost you $9,817 to wear that watch on your wrist. (even at 5% interest, your cost is still about $4200) So yeah, it cost you a fair amount of money to own jewlery
A battery operated watch is not an option for me. In the places I fly I am not going to find anyone to replace a battery in an electronic watch when it fails.
Boy, the precession of silly rationalizations just never quits. I seem to get more then 2 years use on the battery in my cheap Seiko I bought used in a pawnshop 20 years ago before it starts keeping time like a swiss chornometer. If I was really worried about the battery failing ald leaving me in mortal peril, I could have the battery replaced every year. I think it costs $10. You do return to civilization (civilization being defined as a place that has a jewelry shop capable of replacing a watch battery) more than once every 2 years, don't you?
Again, If you really are in situations where a failed watch would cause you serious inconvenience (which I don't for a moment believe) You would be far safer from whatever imagined dangers with 3 timex ironman watches and a couple of spare batteries. I believe that the ironman has a back that can be removed withe a miniature phillips screwdiver, available from Radio Shack for about $2.
Look, just give up trying to justify an expensive swiss watch on accuracy, reliability, necessity or (especially ridiculously) economics. Let's be honest, you weart an expensive piece of jewelry because you like to wear an expensive piece of jewelry. It makes you feel good for whatever reason. Fine, I'm cool with that. It's your money, and presumably you're not starving your kids to buy the watch. Some of the things I do with my money can't be justified on a rational basis either. So you like expensive jewelry, nothing wrong with that, I suppose. When you start trying to rationalize it as a necessity, you fail, and you make yourself look silly in the process.