Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I.P. Freley said:Not having any knowledge of what the previous contractual commitments were/are, what is so unbelievably horrible about any of this that everyone is totally freaking out about it? Well, except for the 8/10 days off guarantee? And what of the compensation per hour and the monthly guarantee?
Some of it sounds sketchy, but why is everyone so up in arms about this?
bustinmins said:
JO: (beginning of negotiations) "We have to have a deal today by 1700 or furlough notices go out for 200 tomorrow morning"
ALPA: Negotiates for four hours to no avail. Then at 1615 hours the following round of discussions occur.
JO: (yelling at ALPA) "Why won't you take the f'ing deal?
ALPA: (ALPA Calmly)"Simple, there's no scope."
JO: (in extreme anger)Your F'ing scope, the agreed upon sections and the rest of my offer?
ALPApauses to think - this is the only time he has ever offered anything - chats with his partner) "We'd like to go to caucus on that."
JO: "What?, that wasn't an offer - it was a hypothetical!"
ALPA and JO look at the NMB Deputy Chief of Staff who was mediating the negotiations
NMB: "Sounded like an offer to me".
MESA ATTORNEY: puts face in hands and shakes head
ALPA Retreats to caucus because we had to have an answer to him in 45 minutes or the deal is off and furloughs begin.
ALPA returns and accepts the offer
JO: "I'll have to think about it?"
NMB:"You have to think about your own offer?" NMB looks rather
sternly at JO.....
JO: "We accept".
JD
DruDown said:Regardless of what the Mesa guys "sound like," the fact is the TA has been ratified by the pilot group at Mesa - the focus should now be to prevent similar happenings at other companies. If we want to be unified, we should be working with CHQ and helping them not get into the same situation, and the group at Mesaba. Those guys are in a similar situation with "alter-ego" crap and shifting assets.
Another great point Dru! But now the other companies are put into a GREAT bind trying to over come statments from MGT like "Mesa's contract is this" It is extremely disheartning to put in the work to make things better as a whole to only have yet another group tear down what took years to build. Comair was willing and did walk for what was right. We at Air Wisconsin were prepared to do the same. We went out on the line to raise the standard at this level of airline flying and mesa has set us back to levels pre 1994 and for what???? They chose not to hold the line and thus should not expect ANY respect from those those of us who did. CHQ and Mesaba can now expect the roughest negotiations tactics there are and the threat of "we will use alter-ego to farm out your work. This business has always been "no pain no gain" Mesa, you have proven that you were unwilling to put in the necessary work and thus don't deserve my or any of us who have put in the work, respect. Denver will be a hostile enviroment for you from us as I am sure it will be in many other cities around the country...
WD.
RJPilott said:Dru...
What one carrier does has a direct effect on other carriers. I wouldnt mind it so much if Mesa accepted a TA that was at least worth a decent life after so much training and hard work to get where they are. But it seems they just threw in the towel on something (scope) that could have been a bluff to begin with to get such a sub-standard contract.. Tunnel vision on scope is not the way to go. Ask any mainline pilot.
Wiskey Driver said:DruDown said:
This business has always been "no pain no gain" Mesa, you have proven that you were unwilling to put in the necessary work and thus don't deserve my or any of us who have put in the work, respect. Denver will be a hostile enviroment for you from us as I am sure it will be in many other cities around the country...
WD.
I do believe that Mesa put in a lot of work and did everything they felt they could. There is no way Mesa would have been allowed to strike with the current condition of their codeshare partners and there is no way to know that JO would not have transferred everything to Freedumb. Are you saying it would be better to have 1400 or so pilots on the street, plus the other 2000 or so employees and let Freedumb succeed? Again, this TA saved jobs and created more jobs and closed down the alter-ego - I think these are some big victories.
English said:Someone posted that this action by Mesa does not "lower the bar" for others. But actually, I know of at least one airline (American Eagle) that uses an "industry average" to determine annual pay raises. Eagle takes an average of several regional airlines' payscales and uses that average to determine the IAI increases to salary. So, Mesa has just directly lowered the pay of American Eagle as well. I'm not saying it was right or wrong, just pointing out that their actions DID directly affect other pilots and families.
DruDown said:I do believe that Mesa put in a lot of work and did everything they felt they could. There is no way Mesa would have been allowed to strike with the current condition of their codeshare partners and there is no way to know that JO would not have transferred everything to Freedumb. Are you saying it would be better to have 1400 or so pilots on the street, plus the other 2000 or so employees and let Freedumb succeed? Again, this TA saved jobs and created more jobs and closed down the alter-ego - I think these are some big victories.
DruDown said:Strike? You think they would have been given authorization to strike considering the current conditions of their codeshare partners and the federal money involved? Learn how the process works before you start casting stones. The pilots cannot just decide to walk and do so. Approval must be granted to do so after the 30 day cooling off period, and there is slim to no chance it would have been granted.
...Look at the entire picture and not just how it affects you.
Wiskey Driver said:I call them people because they don't deserve to be called "PILOTS"
WD.
DruDown said:Thank you for being so professional!
Your upset because your not going to get what YOU want, and your too lazy to put in the extra effort required to negtioate effectively for it, and too childish to see the whole picture and must resort to name calling so you can feel better about yourself.
Take all of this anger and energy and put it back into your company and fight there for what you think you deserve. Keep in mind what you think you deserve and what your codeshare partners are able to pay you may be two entirely different things. Remember United pays most of your bills and look where they are now - partially because you've been getting what "you deserve."
You know what Dru, I don't have to. I benefit each and everyday from THE INDUSTRY LEADING CONTRACT. We laid the foundation for you people and YOU fuked it up!!! Ual pays some of our bills and Airtran pays some but lets say UAL closes today, we will still be here and flying for who ever picks up the routes. Don't get too high and mighty there the only reason UAL is even looking in your direction is bankruptcy. You see UAL laid down with the mesa whores before and wound up with VD. You guys have the worst completion ratio in the country and we both know your F9 contract is hanging by threads. So enjoy your job as you watch those who come in go super senior to you with the J4J, something we and Skywest turned down hmmm I wonder why??? Oh and BTW I know I keep refering to you but something tells me that you are employed there.
WD
mckpickle said:
The excuse that "WE GOT SCOPE" is a cop out.
Wiskey Driver said:Finally, mesa's act hurt the regional airline pilots negotiating position and it set it back several years. It was purely self serving and without reguard to any of the other carriers.
I.P. Freley said:Please direct us to the pilot who would possibly vote himself out of a job, and then explain it to his wife and kids thusly:
I.P. Freley said:
But still... 8 days off on reserve? Who on earth agreed to THAT??![]()