Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

What A Freaking Shock!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
General,

I'm not giving you low blows...I am, however, sarcastically replying to your "Thank gawd we raised the bar" attitude. WTF did that accomplish? We can argue this until we are old, but it certainly didn't help your financial situation. You say we don't have a union or a voice. I'm confused, remind me what your union and your voice is doing to help you right now. On another note, I sure hope that someday I'm not complaining on here that you "set the new benchmark for the industry's narrowbody rates". What's that line about throwing stones in glass houses? And as for making fun of you chief, well, I guess I am. I am making fun of how you would peel your own skin off in defense of mother delta, but she may be abandoning you General and you seem blind to that fact. Wake up!
 
IB6 UB9 said:
General,

I'm not giving you low blows...I am, however, sarcastically replying to your "Thank gawd we raised the bar" attitude. WTF did that accomplish? We can argue this until we are old, but it certainly didn't help your financial situation. You say we don't have a union or a voice. I'm confused, remind me what your union and your voice is doing to help you right now. On another note, I sure hope that someday I'm not complaining on here that you "set the new benchmark for the industry's narrowbody rates". What's that line about throwing stones in glass houses? And as for making fun of you chief, well, I guess I am. I am making fun of how you would peel your own skin off in defense of mother delta, but she may be abandoning you General and you seem blind to that fact. Wake up!


No, I tried to combat the notion that we Dalpa members don't care and love pay cuts. People are quick to forget that we ONCE fought for a GREAT contract, and the highest pay scales ever. We accomplished that too, and then others tried to get close or match. That is the way it should be. Leo Mullin signed the contract too. If you think that is why we went bankrupt (forget having money problems and then oil goes to $70 a barrel), then you are wrong. There were a lot of mistakes made, but not all by us, and we were a fixed cost, even though we were a high one. (until last December)

Maybe you haven't sensed that I now blame your management, and not your pilots for your low 100 seat pay rates. I know that you had no say, and that is unfortunate. I made a 180 on that issue.

As far as my unabashing love for Mother D, I think a lot of that has changed in the last couple years. I really can't believe what has happened since 9-11. It is a living nightmare. I have defended Delta throughout, yet I still get smacked by management. I lost a lot of the "Delta Spirit" in the last couple years. But, I still want Delta to succeed because I have enjoyed the flying part and I think we still have a chance to get better or atleast merge with someone that will allow us to go forward. I don't have the answers, but I am not turning my back completely on Delta, yet. I hope I don't have to.

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
General Lee said:
If you think our pay alone sunk us, try to remember the part (even the judge brought this up) about Delta buying $2 billion in stock just prior to 9-11, and then it vaporizing.

One of the most amazing things about this sad spectacle has been how effective management has been in keeping the discussion on pilot pay instead of their own ineptitude. ALPA's failures over the last ten years are almost too numerous to count, but its outright surrender in the PR battle has to be close to the top of the list. The people who scrape the gum off the floors of busses and subways in New York earn more than many professional pilots do, but I gues that's just our dirty little secret.

And, I didn't slam you guys, rather your management. They are the ones who approved your 100 seat rates. Since you do not have a union or a voice, it really couldn't be stopped by you.

Fine, I'll slam them for you. It's the mother of all SJS epidemics. You're just begging the question with the "no union" line. These guys are flying for less than 30 cents on the dollar of what similar-sized equipment has paid in the past because......they want to. It's what they think they're worth. How can anyone hope to compete with an outfit that can get its aircraft groomers to fly the planes for free?
 
Last edited:
General Lee said:
Network-King,

As far as the 100 seat rate, we are also fighting for the 79 seaters. I am sure that the rates will be low, but that wasn't our fault.......

Give me a Fokkin' break. These are jobs that were beneath your double-breasted majesty years ago because the a$$clowns running your union didn't think their squadron buddies' dignity would be adequately served by having them start their careers in these aircraft. The rates are low because ALPA created the until-then unheard of notion of professional pilots as second-class citizens. It is most definitely your fault.

As a connoisseur of great payback I think it's hilarious that your'e enthusiastic about the prospect of Delta pilots flying small jets at rates that would have been unthinkable for all but the dirtiest of dirtbag scooter-trash airlines 5 years ago. As someone who's looking at the prospect of an alter-ego of ALPA's creation being used as leverage to take money from my pocket and use it to buy some scumbag's ski chalet, I'm pissed.

LOA 50's narrow margin means one thing and one thing only: your management needs to just tweak its appeal to the naked self-interest of DALPA's green-slipping mercenaries a wee bit to achieve the ultimate beat-down a few months down the road.

Hear that Mr. Lee? That is the sound of inevitability.

80 for 80.
 
Last edited:
Networ-King said:
General.....

You know.... sometimes I can see your point of view and learn to agree with you because being optomistic is positive, but you've been nothing, but a stupid koolaid drinker from day one and you've never actually looked at the facts. YOUR IN DENIAL MAN, get over it. You've been optomistic for the last 4 freaking years. Being positive about your company is one thing, but after the a$$ pounding that you've taken in the last 4 years its time to get your head out of your a$$ man. Get real for once...Im crossing my fingers and hoping that things will work out at big brown, but Im not holding my breath. Im being cautiously optomistic.... hoping for the best and assuming the worst. Wait till march and you'll see HOW DALPA will "SAVE" your compensation. Reality sucks man I know, but sooner or later your gonna have to crawl out from underneath that rock. Like you say ALL THE FREAKING TIME "Time will tell"...

Please enlighten us how DALPA is going to save the world again or management is going to come up with yet another Delta saving plan called douchebag airlines with you as the captain in a pink skirt dancing on water and the caption saying.... "Douche Bag Airlines.... the fresh new start"


bring it you koolaid drinking retard


This gotta be the best post I've read in the a long time!!
 
General,

You raised the bar only to be smacked by it.

Remember, it was DALPA who first scoped OUT the RJ's back in '96. Had you scoped them in there wouldn't be this race to the bottom. DALPA and other union shops would have followed suit, i.e. CAL (non-ALPA at the time) and AMR (APA).

This "stepping on one's unit" is in large part why we're in the mess we, as an industry, are in today.

Don't you for one minute believe you've saved the company. As soon as you do, you'll be hit up for more.

Profit sharing, stock option, and scope will get you your control and honor.
 
The Atlanta media is reporting that Delta wants another %6 and will seek it. I am certain they will get it after watching what just happen.
 
FlyBoeingJets said:
General,

I know Delta better than you think and I see much in the post above that is correct.

Don't confuse the senior DALPA guys quest for millionaire status with "raising the bar". It's called cashing in. I don't blame them for it since it seems to be the American way. But facts are facts. Management and pilots took their cash and left a shell of a company. You have been left to pick up the pieces. "Good Luck, we are all counting on you"


Hopefully it will not happen at SWA.



Wanna bet?


PHXFLYR:cool:
 
HalinTexas said:
General,

You raised the bar only to be smacked by it.

Remember, it was DALPA who first scoped OUT the RJ's back in '96. Had you scoped them in there wouldn't be this race to the bottom. DALPA and other union shops would have followed suit, i.e. CAL (non-ALPA at the time) and AMR (APA).

This "stepping on one's unit" is in large part why we're in the mess we, as an industry, are in today.

Don't you for one minute believe you've saved the company. As soon as you do, you'll be hit up for more.

Profit sharing, stock option, and scope will get you your control and honor.

There you go, it was all our fault.... Give me a break. How about high management pay? Leo Mullin got $16 million, and he did a crappy job. Right? Don't blame it on the pilots and the C2K contract, since it was a fixed cost and they knew about it. We would have given more sooner, had there not been an offshore account for the top thirty executives. (that all left anyway)

And, we haven't saved the company, I know that. We gave some time for more negotiations to take place, and give us a better chance to get credit for a possible dumping of the pensions. That is why 58% voted YES. It doesn't mean we are their ATM. The judge is still watching this, and will approve or disapprove the final product, and she has already given her opinion on what we should get credit for.

As far as scope, profit sharing, etc----those are all high on the list. We all knew we were in for another pay cut, since the C2K contract really gave us a large raise, and that went away last December. We knew another one was on the way. We also know the pensions will be gone, and that is something we want credit for (out of the total $325 million needed by the company) and was acknowledged by the judge herself.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
regionaltard said:
Give me a Fokkin' break. These are jobs that were beneath your double-breasted majesty years ago because the a$$clowns running your union didn't think their squadron buddies' dignity would be adequately served by having them start their careers in these aircraft. The rates are low because ALPA created the until-then unheard of notion of professional pilots as second-class citizens. It is most definitely your fault.

As a connoisseur of great payback I think it's hilarious that your'e enthusiastic about the prospect of Delta pilots flying small jets at rates that would have been unthinkable for all but the dirtiest of dirtbag scooter-trash airlines 5 years ago. As someone who's looking at the prospect of an alter-ego of ALPA's creation being used as leverage to take money from my pocket and use it to buy some scumbag's ski chalet, I'm pissed.

LOA 50's narrow margin means one thing and one thing only: your management needs to just tweak its appeal to the naked self-interest of DALPA's green-slipping mercenaries a wee bit to achieve the ultimate beat-down a few months down the road.

Hear that Mr. Lee? That is the sound of inevitability.

80 for 80.

Say what? You are nuts. Those planes that we want would directly replace planes we fly now. Should we not go after that? Sure, they say we might have a 100 seat rate like Jetblue's, but no orders as of yet. We also have a rate for the 737-700 and the 737-900, yet none of those on the ramp. The only thing we have heard so far was a request for 200 79 seaters. We want to replace the 737-200s with OUR PILOTS. Make sense yet chief?

A narrow margin means what again? Ok.....sure chief. I don't think a vote has ever been that close. That means one more time and the vote goes NEGATIVE. There were many on the fence, and they decided to give them one more chance. Really, the discontent is out there, I see it----you don't.
Both ALPA and management now see it.

And, you say a few months down the road, eh? A Summertime strike, or threat, will hurt sales, and that is known to everyone. I sure hope it doesn't get there, and I think there will be a settlement before then. If not, it may be a bumpy Summer.

Hear that Mr. Regional? How's your contract stuff going?


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
"We want to replace the 737-200s with OUR PILOTS."

And people in hell want ice water.
 
Last edited:
General Lee said:
There you go, it was all our fault.... Give me a break. How about high management pay? Leo Mullin got $16 million, and he did a crappy job. Right? Don't blame it on the pilots and the C2K contract, since it was a fixed cost and they knew about it. We would have given more sooner, had there not been an offshore account for the top thirty executives. (that all left anyway)

And, we haven't saved the company, I know that. We gave some time for more negotiations to take place, and give us a better chance to get credit for a possible dumping of the pensions. That is why 58% voted YES. It doesn't mean we are their ATM. The judge is still watching this, and will approve or disapprove the final product, and she has already given her opinion on what we should get credit for.

As far as scope, profit sharing, etc----those are all high on the list. We all knew we were in for another pay cut, since the C2K contract really gave us a large raise, and that went away last December. We knew another one was on the way. We also know the pensions will be gone, and that is something we want credit for (out of the total $325 million needed by the company) and was acknowledged by the judge herself.


Bye Bye--General Lee

You take kudos and sometimes you get lumps.
 
regionaltard said:
"We want to replace the 737-200s with OUR PILOTS."

And people in hell want ice water.

That's why I pay lots of money to a union, to hopefully fight for me and others. We all have issues that are important, and this one really is important to most. ALPA knows this and it is a priority. We need to keep as many high paying (or potentially high paying) jobs as we can, and if we lose the 737-200s eventually, we have to find planes that will replace them to keep our jobs and allow our furloughs to return if they want to.

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
HalinTexas said:
You take kudos and sometimes you get lumps.


Unjustly. Everyone has an opinion, but a lot of people don't really do the research.

Sure, we could have scoped the RJs back in '96, but then again could you see into the future and envisioned this? How about 9-11? Why didn't you tell someone? We have now learned about what happened when losing those planes forever, and now we are trying to correct that same mistake, and everyone complains. We now want to preserve the jobs, but we get slammed. We are now, finally, doing the correct thing by trying to keep everything over 70 seats. But, the RJDC can't see that. Tell them CAL is hiring please.

Bye Bye--General Lee
 
General Lee said:
That's why I pay lots of money to a union, to hopefully fight for me and others. No you pay union dues because you HAVE to. And Alpo has done nothing but FY and all the junior guys to keep the senior guys happy. FAE and all....We all have issues that are important, and this one really is important to most. ALPA knows this and it is a priority. You must have been telling that to yourself for a very long time because you are actually starting to believe your own BS. Alpa's only priority is to keep the senior guys happy and keep the monthly dues coming in so that woerthless and the bunch get their salaries. We need to keep as many high paying (or potentially high paying) jobs as we can, and if we lose the 737-200s eventually, we have to find planes that will replace them to keep our jobs and allow our furloughs to return if they want to.

High paying jobs? Where? Hey skippy.... why don't you and the back stabbing, greenslipping whores at delta stop day dreaming and stop flying opentime? All the furloughs (the ones that want to)would have been back by now if the pilots with their scab like mentality at mother D would have stopped the opentime flying. And I think most people in this industry already realize that the greedy bunch at delta would do anything to keep "our jobs" as you put it. The only reason you are such a "kool-aid" drinker is because you have been working throughout this whole mess and have never been furloughed. Don't worry its just a matter of time with these baboons running delta into the ground. And Im sure when your getting the pounding in the rear by delta, you'll come on here and say " at least delta wore a condom when they pounded me.... unlike the other airlines in BK they didn't use any protection on their pilots."

Bye Bye--General Lee

I really think you should change your name to bahgdad bob general:laugh:
 
General Lee said:
Unjustly. Everyone has an opinion, but a lot of people don't really do the research.

Sure, we could have scoped the RJs back in '96, but then again could you see into the future and envisioned this?



Nope, all that was necessary was to look into the past. I believe that's known in some circles as research.
 
I can't wait for the day that I step onto one of those 90-100 seat RJ's as a passenger and stick my head in the cockpit as I'm boarding and ask the two double-breasted arrogant a$$holes are they Skywest or ASA!!!! They will no doubt fire back that they are mainline Delta, then I'll say "but this is an RJ!" The look on their faces will be priceless!
 
commuterpuke said:
I can't wait for the day that I step onto one of those 90-100 seat RJ's as a passenger and stick my head in the cockpit as I'm boarding and ask the two double-breasted arrogant a$$holes are they Skywest or ASA!!!! They will no doubt fire back that they are mainline Delta, then I'll say "but this is an RJ!" The look on their faces will be priceless!

Great post. Then ask them if they have tried to get on flying a big jet somewhere. Tell them AirTran is hiring. That would be a blast.
 
commuterpuke said:
I can't wait for the day that I step onto one of those 90-100 seat RJ's as a passenger and stick my head in the cockpit as I'm boarding and ask the two double-breasted arrogant a$$holes are they Skywest or ASA!!!! They will no doubt fire back that they are mainline Delta, then I'll say "but this is an RJ!" The look on their faces will be priceless!

What about the arrogant commuterpuke a'hole walking in the grocery store with his uniform telling all the "chicks" he flies for DL!?
737
Was that you??
 

Latest resources

Back
Top