Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ALPA best represents the interests of the OLD highest paid, highest dues paying members and all potential new ones. All of us in between are screwed!
Seems like it's ALL about the money for ALPA
How can you take it back when you never had it in the first place?
You regional guys just don't get it. You cost ALPA far more than you'll ever pay in!!! You hear that giant sucking sound? That's the sound of the regional ALPA carriers sucking all of the dues income from the legacy carriers who actually pay for the ALPA services that you use. If ALPA was "all about the money" as you say, then ALPA would dump every regional airline and only focus on the legacies. There's no money to be made in representing regional pilot groups.
I love it:
YOU REGIONAL GUYS
You have been away from GIA how long?
Maybe it's just time for the regionals to leave ALPA.... then everyone will be happy....
I agree. Now how do we get there, Joe. I think the upcoming flowthrough agreement at USAir is a good start, along with the Compass/NWA flowthrough, but you don't agree with those programs. What do you suggest? And please don't just launch into another diatribe about how ALPA has screwed you over. We've all heard it before. Let's hear some solutions for a change.There shouldn't be "regional" and "major" pilots... there should just be pilots....
PCL 128, being the good Herndon lap dog that he is, is saying that unions aren't about money.... However the facts don't back that up...
The AFL-CIO is supporting illegal alien amnesty and has filed a lawsuit against the "no match letter law".... you would think that the largest labor union would support laws that stop cheap labor from coming into the US, but they don't.... Why you ask? Because they are potential dues paying members.....
Actually, the facts do back that up. You simply refuse to acknowledge the facts. True or false, Joey: the ASA MEC's budget exceeds the amount of dues revenue that the ASA pilot group sends to the Association. As a former ST, you should know that the answer to that question is a resounding TRUE.
PCL_128 said:You should do a little bit more reading, Joey. The AFL-CIO is opposed to this law because 70% of the SSA "mismatch" cases are of legal United States citizens and are only caused by clerical errors. There are much better ways to enforce immigration law that don't put legal workers at risk.
Just ask the East Coast Airways Pilot group how they feel about how ALPA represented them.
In summary, we receive more money than we put in, but we still have to compete for flying, and we are beholden to our "masters".... Thanks but No Thanks!
Maybe you should do a little more reseach before you shoot your mouth off.....
Mr Pro ALPA.Just as I suspected, no comments on the actual facts. Just more ignorance from the anti-ALPA zealots.
Second, why did you leave an ALPA carrier for an non ALPA carrier?
So, in summary, it has absolutely nothing to do with money. Thanks for proving my point for me, Joe. As for the master/slave relationship that you keep referring to, I've asked you repeatedly for your ideas to fix the current system, but you still provide none. I am all in favor of a system that ends the regional/mainline divide, but I have yet to hear any workable solutions.
PCL_128 said:Wow, you dug deep for that one, Joey! That article was written over 7 years ago when Clinton was still in office. I'm honestly not sure what the AFL-CIO's current position is on amnesty, but I haven't heard anything lately from them in support of it.
There needs to be one list, and one voice for each brand.... until that time, we will continue to compete with each other..... union or not, ALPA or not, we will compete.... Brand scope initiated by the mainlines and ALPA national will be needed to accomplish this.... however I won't hold my breath...
The AFL CIO hasn't changed it's tune since then.... they are still opposed to fighting illegal immigration.... you have become quite the Democratic lap dog in addition to you Herndon lap dog duties....
Brand scope would have been great when the brand was easily definable. When I went to work for Pinnacle, the brand was easy to define: NWA, PCL (then EXA), and MSA. Now NewCo (umm, I mean Compass) has been added to the list, and PCL flies for Delta also. How do you combine this "brand" into one seniority list now? Do the PCL guys get added to the NWA list, or the DAL list? Do they just get left out in the cold, despite being ALPA members? The DAL brand is the hardest to define. How many feeder carriers does DAL now use? Is it up to 10 now? Some are non-ALPA, some are non-union, how do you combine this "brand" into a single list, Joe? The brand scope ship has sailed. The mainline pilots FUBARed that one pretty good. Time to look for a new solution.
PCL_128 said:Check your other thread. I'm with you on this one...
There really is no future in the airlines. Same stuff that has been going on for years.
The simple fact is this:
ALPA has NEVER been in control, and, given their history, never will. That said, they have nothing to "take back."