weasel_lips
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2006
- Posts
- 474
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The way I see it, accepting a US AIR recall is ONLY an option if you are unemployed and in desperate need of a job. It would be foolish to leave a stable job for that place. It is surprising people are getting hung up on the decision at all.
No, it is not how it is handled everywhere else. At Continental they run a system bid, and you know what equipment you will be recalled into based on seniority. Now, with newhires, yes it is luck of the draw.Isn't that how it works at every airline in the world? Example....Let's say Fedex is having a class Jul 1st and then another class July 15th. The class starting on the 1st is all 727 FE positions while the class starting on the 15th turns out to be MD-11 spots. Was seniority abrogated when the junior pilots ended up in the widebodies? I'm sure all those senior pilots sitting on the panel of the 727 would much rather take the MD-11. The same thing happened at UAL back in the boom days when pilots were getting hired right into the 75/767 while more senior pilots were seatlocked on the 737. Those are the breaks.
He gets the A330 EVEN THOUGH HE IS JUNIOR to the senior pilot in the previous class.
See? The US Airways folks can't even handle seniority issues among themselves, much less within the context of a merger.
Seniority is no guarantee of circumstance. The guys accepting recall a year ago are senior but there were simply no openings on the A330 at the time nor the ability to see into the future as to how each pilot would structure their bid choices.
I agree bidding on positions prior to return is a good idea but Manglement is ( and always has at AAA ) resisting.