Right on, bro! In addition to that I'd like to hear the mainline pilots tell us how we are supposed to accumulate the experience required by the majors for employment. That's one point they'll never mention when it comes to that damn RJ/mainline debate. The mainline pilots have done a good job in dividing this pilot group into the worthy ones (those flying for a legacy carrier and oblivious to anything else) and not-worthy ones (RJ guys).
This bb is full of RJ-haters that blame us for their everyday problem, and accuse us of unprofessionalism etc. It is easier to point the finger at someone else.
Fly a turbo prop on 1 - 1.5 hour hops! Why should a 70 seat rj fly a 4 hr leg MCI-SFO when that used to be and should still be a B737/57 route? would it no be better flying that leg for 90+ an hour versus 32? as an FO?