scottn2flying
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2005
- Posts
- 51
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NASA's July 1971 final report reached three conclusions about the PA-30 Twin Comanche:
- At the stall, large rolling and yawing moments occurred as a result of asymmetric wing stall. The left wing stalled, NASA said, at an angle of attack about 2 degrees lower than the right wing.
- These rolling and yawing moments are larger than the corrective moments produced by aileron and rudder controls.
- The airplane exhibits a flat spin under certain conditions involving the use of asymmetric power.
In July 1970, Piper provided — free of charge via Service Letter 558 — an airflow modification kit. This included wing leading edge stall strips, a rudder seal strip, an aileron/rudder interconnect system, and a re-rigging of the rudder and stabilator. All of this was intended to provide better aerodynamic stall warning and controllability at low airspeeds and high angles of attack.
My first approach to Vmc in the Twin Comanche was very subtle. Airspeed bled off very slowly, the yoke was held back to slow the airplane. Rudder pressure was increased till the rudder was hard over. At Vmc the airplane began to turn into the inoperative engine. I was out of rudder and could not keep the airplane from turning. Very good. I had recognized Vmc. My instructor was satisfied I'd had the experience. I relaxed on the yoke; airspeed picked up and I could now control direction again. Just to make sure I had the idea, I decided to try it again. Only this time, I didn't have the patience to go slowly toward Vmc. I knew what it took to get there so why not speed up the process a little? Big mistake!
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][/FONT]I pulled back sharply on the wheel. The power had not been touched. We slowed very quickly but the speed didn't stop at Vmc. We went through it suddenly. Very suddenly! The airplane snapped violently to the left and we were upside down in an instant. I reacted instinctively, pulling power, whipping ailerons, and stomping rudder all at the same time. I stopped the roll, but now we were on our back, nose down, headed for the ground, 4,000 feet below.
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Sans-serif,sans-serif][/FONT]Don't ask me why, but the natural thing to do seemed to be to continue down in a split-S maneuver for recovery. I'd had enough rolling to last me awhile, but I suppose an alternative recovery would have been to roll on over and zoom out the bottom. It just seemed important at the time to stop the roll to keep from spinning. We lost about 2,000 feet, maybe more, in that half loop before we were level again.
JAC2LAS said:I have some ocean front propterty in Arizona too! Haha...you got me...it's a 67'...I got it a little backwards...well a lot backwards
The avionics arn't brand new by any means, but the 75k seems pretty inline with what I've seen on aso.com. It's not my aircraft though, so I'm not 100% what the guy wants for it, but I think his thinking was around 75, but again, I'm not sure.
With a pretty basic package (dual nav-com, DME, ADF) what do you think it'd be worth?
icefr8dawg said:Regarding the brakes, they use an older one (like '64) at CDW here in NJ that has dual brakes. Must've come from the factory that way or they picked up parts at the graveyard...
TrapAv8r said:I am trying to find an instructor near Raleigh, NC to get a PA-30 logbook sign off for insurance purposes. A friend of mine has added me to his insurance and is allowing me to use his Twin Comanche for Angel Flights. Anybody know the best way to find an MEI with 25 hours in the Twinco, 1000 retract, and 1500 total time (basically to meet insurance mins)?