I'll agree with you for the most part on tax policy, but foreign policy and national defense? Really? Are there really still people out there that think Iraq is going well?
Yes, actually, many. I won't debate whether it's going well or not, but we're there...that's the reality, and it's something that we can't lose. The consequences would be horrific for the middle east, but most importantly, for us. The genocide that would ensue in Iraq and the region would make the carnage in post-Vietnam Cambodia and Laos look like child's play. Interesting how the democrats want to save Darfur (something of zero national security value to us), yet want to abandon the desperate situation in the middle east, a region that is of vital security interest to the entire world.
I supported the war for a while, but it's become obvious that this group can't fight a war.
Who? The military? We have the most lethal, advanced, intelligent warfighters ever to walk the earth. My goodness, we can't lose. There is a military definition of winning a war: "When the opposition loses the will to fight." By this definition, who is losing the war? Who is losing the will to fight? That's right...it's not the crazy Muslims, and it's not the American military: It's the American people. Our military won't lose this war: It will be the fools protesting in the streets of Washington and San Francisco putting pressure on the elected politicians to surrender.
We've fallen into the same trap as we did in Vietnam: a bunch of politicians are running a war and refusing to fight it to win it. We refuse to go near Mosques, even if they're being used for nothing but housing terrorists.
With very few exceptions, you're describing Democrats.
I'll agree with you on the restrictive Rules of Engagement: Although they nowhere near approach the self-defeating ROE of Vietnam, they are self-defeating, no less, and need to be eliminated. That needs to come straight from the top.
This war has turned into a disaster, and Bush has done nothing of substance to fix it. The "surge" is nothing but adding more troops to an existing quagmire.
Yes, the war is a disaster. Is any war not a disaster? Don't confuse Bush with Johnson. Bush is a hands-off guy (maybe too hands-off). He lets the generals call the shots. If there is blame to be had, it's with the generals, and the politicians who refuse to give them the money that they need.
You are wrong Sir, the surge is working.
Sorry, but I agree with Biden's idea on Iraq: divide it up into three separate states with a very loose federal government, and then it's time for us to bail out.
Sure. How are we going to get to that point? How will their government deal with the insurgence and Al-Qaeda? How will they defend themselves from Iran and their apocalyptic nut job leader who wants to destroy everyone not on board with his program?
Look, we all want to get out of Iraq. We all want this to end. But it's something we have to face. And it's something we have to win.