Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
- Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
- Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
- Share the passion for aviation
- Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun
Trouble ahead for Low Cost Carriers???
- Thread starter General Lee
- Start date
- Watchers 17
Welcome to Flightinfo.com
- Register now and join the discussion
- Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
- Invite your friends
- Share the passion of aviation
- Friendliest aviation community on the web
FLB717
Pilot=proof of Gods humor
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2003
- Posts
- 627
NEWS FLASH, GENERAL LEE AND TBAGS SAME GUY!!!!!
Thank you for letting me know that I must fand a job at a "Real" = "Major" airline as soon as you guys rehire (in 2020) because my company is going to make less money (still in the black)tomorrow because of the new and improved aspects on the NEW MAJORS. News flsh all, if DAL adds capacity and reduces costs by flying more flights to the same cities using the same number of employees you are not the first. We do it all the time. As far as this HUB raider stuff, fine. NWA has done the same thing to us in FNT. They had now large (DC9) aircraft in FNT and then woke up and said "Hey AirTran is getting people to fly from FNT, **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED**, we need to do that too!" When I was hired we had 9 monopoly (not the game) routes from ATL. Why?. To stay away from DAL. Now we have 0. So the moral of the story is fly to the cites you want when you want and if it happens to be from to DAL AA CAL cities oh well. Ive also read so much about how the LCC's will be so hard presssed to compete against each other. Whats so bad, the traditionals do it every day. Ok Im off the soap box.
Thank you for letting me know that I must fand a job at a "Real" = "Major" airline as soon as you guys rehire (in 2020) because my company is going to make less money (still in the black)tomorrow because of the new and improved aspects on the NEW MAJORS. News flsh all, if DAL adds capacity and reduces costs by flying more flights to the same cities using the same number of employees you are not the first. We do it all the time. As far as this HUB raider stuff, fine. NWA has done the same thing to us in FNT. They had now large (DC9) aircraft in FNT and then woke up and said "Hey AirTran is getting people to fly from FNT, **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED**, we need to do that too!" When I was hired we had 9 monopoly (not the game) routes from ATL. Why?. To stay away from DAL. Now we have 0. So the moral of the story is fly to the cites you want when you want and if it happens to be from to DAL AA CAL cities oh well. Ive also read so much about how the LCC's will be so hard presssed to compete against each other. Whats so bad, the traditionals do it every day. Ok Im off the soap box.
General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
Ty and SWADude,
Come on now, the Home Depot jokes may seem funny to you, but tell that to the furloughed pilot's kids at home. Not really that funny, is it? Try not to bring somebody's unemployment into this.
This thread was created because of a couple articles that were written by Wall Street types who brought up some interesting questions. T-Bags brought up some good points, and then SWADude questions his schooling, and TY makes fun of furloughed people. Nice.
Bye Bye--General Lee
Come on now, the Home Depot jokes may seem funny to you, but tell that to the furloughed pilot's kids at home. Not really that funny, is it? Try not to bring somebody's unemployment into this.
This thread was created because of a couple articles that were written by Wall Street types who brought up some interesting questions. T-Bags brought up some good points, and then SWADude questions his schooling, and TY makes fun of furloughed people. Nice.
Bye Bye--General Lee
SWAdude
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2003
- Posts
- 634
" T-Bags brought up some good points, and then SWADude questions his schooling,"
Get it right General...who questioned whos schooling...
Your new best friend responded to my post by saying...
"SWA dude, did you get your GED from the same place as TY?"
I followed him into that hole.
I would be careful who you call your friends.
Get it right General...who questioned whos schooling...
Your new best friend responded to my post by saying...
"SWA dude, did you get your GED from the same place as TY?"
I followed him into that hole.
I would be careful who you call your friends.
roman
Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2002
- Posts
- 21
This site has become such a monumental waste of time. Is there another where I can just get information without all this bs? And it's no wonder that the non-military think we are arrogant after these comments. Those of us who are currently serving in the Mid-East right now would like to collectively ask you to shut up.
Ty Webb
Hostage to Fortune
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2001
- Posts
- 6,524
UAL projects a moderate profit for 2004 with a HUGE profit in 2005. UAL's operation produced more cashflow in october than AT has in the last three years COMBINED.
I'll take profits over cash flow any day. I'll also take real profits over "operating profits". . . . and you can project whatever you want for 2005, because UAL will probably not even be around then. And as far as financials go, we could buy and sell UAL tomorrow, if you weren't all wrapped up in bankruptcy proceedings.
And if you want to bring up the Valujet crash of 7 years ago to bolster your weak argument, go right ahead, but it shows everyone what you are made of, and it ain't "the right stuff", that's for sure.
Have a nice life, little man.
I'll take profits over cash flow any day. I'll also take real profits over "operating profits". . . . and you can project whatever you want for 2005, because UAL will probably not even be around then. And as far as financials go, we could buy and sell UAL tomorrow, if you weren't all wrapped up in bankruptcy proceedings.
And if you want to bring up the Valujet crash of 7 years ago to bolster your weak argument, go right ahead, but it shows everyone what you are made of, and it ain't "the right stuff", that's for sure.
Have a nice life, little man.
flx757
I gotta have more cowbell
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2002
- Posts
- 1,356
roman said:
I agree with roman. I think my time here is very short. This site has outlived it's "time of useful consciousness".
General Lee said:
I see, General. If Ty makes fun of furloughed people, you have a problem with that, but if your "new best friend" T-Bags mentions "Valuedeath", that's ok.
Pathetic. All of you.
I'm gone until this board digs itself out of this hole. I'm not holding my breath.
SWAdude
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2003
- Posts
- 634
"And it's no wonder that the non-military think we are arrogant after these comments."
Us civilians realize that its not a majority of the military guys. The arrogance can be difficult to be around and especially to work with.
And we know the civilians have our share of freeks.
As for you being the Middle-east, my family has you in our prayers daily. Come home safe to join our friendly skies.
Respectfully,
SWAdude
Us civilians realize that its not a majority of the military guys. The arrogance can be difficult to be around and especially to work with.
And we know the civilians have our share of freeks.
As for you being the Middle-east, my family has you in our prayers daily. Come home safe to join our friendly skies.
Respectfully,
SWAdude
General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
Ok, Ok, I didn't see T-Bags GED statement, which was childish, and the Valuejet remark was in poor taste also. How about we all agree to leave schooling out of this, unemployment, and the Valuejet crash that killed some good pilots and pax? That is not what I wanted with this thread.
SWADude,
When I said T-Bags was my new best friend--I was joking because he seemed to be supporting my theories. But, he did bring up some good points, and I expected you to counter with some good ideas. Agree or disagree, it is your opinion.
Roman,
Sorry, this did get out of hand. I made this thread becuase I read a couple articles that sparked my interest. Take it easy over there in the ME.
Ty,
I know, I know. You're probably right, but let's try to tone it down against the furloughed....
Bye Bye--General Lee
SWADude,
When I said T-Bags was my new best friend--I was joking because he seemed to be supporting my theories. But, he did bring up some good points, and I expected you to counter with some good ideas. Agree or disagree, it is your opinion.
Roman,
Sorry, this did get out of hand. I made this thread becuase I read a couple articles that sparked my interest. Take it easy over there in the ME.
Ty,
I know, I know. You're probably right, but let's try to tone it down against the furloughed....
Bye Bye--General Lee
Last edited:
SWAdude
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2003
- Posts
- 634
"But, he did bring up some good points, and I expected you to counter with some good ideas. Agree or disagree, it is your opinion."
Since when do i come up with good ideas?
I really can't argue in nerdy accounting terms. I am more of common sense approach by my 19 years in the business and what seems to make it work or not.
My point was simply that there is no way that DAL can lower its operating costs by 26 to 27 percent. No legacy carrier could even come close to that. You wouldn't want to do that. Your service level would drastically reduce and your competitive advantage wiped out. You would lose way too many of your return customers which is what makes or breaks any airline.
If T-bag is indeed furloughed...I feel for him. And the last thing I would want to take away from anyone is hope for a recovery. The problem with some of these posts is that they have the air of we are doing better because you might be doing worse. There is nothing that pisses me off worse than people trying to instill fear in others in order for them to fell like their doing better. Its small, unproductive and it think its called terror.
I will always defend our industry, profession and my company but not on the backs of others.
SWAdude
Since when do i come up with good ideas?
I really can't argue in nerdy accounting terms. I am more of common sense approach by my 19 years in the business and what seems to make it work or not.
My point was simply that there is no way that DAL can lower its operating costs by 26 to 27 percent. No legacy carrier could even come close to that. You wouldn't want to do that. Your service level would drastically reduce and your competitive advantage wiped out. You would lose way too many of your return customers which is what makes or breaks any airline.
If T-bag is indeed furloughed...I feel for him. And the last thing I would want to take away from anyone is hope for a recovery. The problem with some of these posts is that they have the air of we are doing better because you might be doing worse. There is nothing that pisses me off worse than people trying to instill fear in others in order for them to fell like their doing better. Its small, unproductive and it think its called terror.
I will always defend our industry, profession and my company but not on the backs of others.
SWAdude
General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
SWADude,
I don't think DAL could lower their operating costs that much either. I think they have made some good moves----installing many Kiosks, moving aircraft around to "right size markets", create a seperate brand that does have a lower CASM due to lower pay, longer segments, and more aircraft utilization, also unfortunately laying off 16,000 people has trimmed the costs a little (including 2500 fewer pilots since 9-11). I think they have tried to make it leaner to compete, and now they are seeing that they cut back too much (hence announcing that they will re-add 8-10% capacity back next year). Cutting back too much can also depress revenue---our VP of Marketing said that last Summer "We left money on the table..." since we parked most of our MD-11s that could have been running full to Europe and atleast bringing in some extra revenue that could have made the losses smaller perhaps. It is hard to lower operating costs when you have a mainline fleet of around 500 planes and you plan to keep them. (Our VP of Flt Ops did say last week that we were going to keep the same number in the fleet) Where else do you cut? Salaries. Some productivity too probably. We can hope fuel prices will eventually go down too. But, fares have been going up, and since capacity has been down in the last two years, the number of seats have been lower (even though I said we were adding back some this next year), so the fares have been slightly higher. As long as the terrorists stay away, I think this next year will help the struggling Majors, and the point of these articles was that it would be more expensive for the LCC operators to add new cities and planes rather than the Majors--because the Majors already have the planes (in the desert), have the gates (unused now), have the people(either furloughed or on leave--can be retrained easily), etc. America West just started transcons on their A319s from JFK/BOS to LAX/SFO. That is great, but they had to pull those planes (and there would have to be atleast 4 A319s doing the turns) from other high frequency routes to the long 5-6 hours flights transcons. They have the extra expense of having to fill in those planes with others (probably 90 seat Mesa RJs). I think that is what the articles were saying---that it will be more expensive for the LCCs in the future to add new markets etc....compared to the Majors who have planes and people waiting to come back to work.(for less)
Bye Bye--General Lee
I don't think DAL could lower their operating costs that much either. I think they have made some good moves----installing many Kiosks, moving aircraft around to "right size markets", create a seperate brand that does have a lower CASM due to lower pay, longer segments, and more aircraft utilization, also unfortunately laying off 16,000 people has trimmed the costs a little (including 2500 fewer pilots since 9-11). I think they have tried to make it leaner to compete, and now they are seeing that they cut back too much (hence announcing that they will re-add 8-10% capacity back next year). Cutting back too much can also depress revenue---our VP of Marketing said that last Summer "We left money on the table..." since we parked most of our MD-11s that could have been running full to Europe and atleast bringing in some extra revenue that could have made the losses smaller perhaps. It is hard to lower operating costs when you have a mainline fleet of around 500 planes and you plan to keep them. (Our VP of Flt Ops did say last week that we were going to keep the same number in the fleet) Where else do you cut? Salaries. Some productivity too probably. We can hope fuel prices will eventually go down too. But, fares have been going up, and since capacity has been down in the last two years, the number of seats have been lower (even though I said we were adding back some this next year), so the fares have been slightly higher. As long as the terrorists stay away, I think this next year will help the struggling Majors, and the point of these articles was that it would be more expensive for the LCC operators to add new cities and planes rather than the Majors--because the Majors already have the planes (in the desert), have the gates (unused now), have the people(either furloughed or on leave--can be retrained easily), etc. America West just started transcons on their A319s from JFK/BOS to LAX/SFO. That is great, but they had to pull those planes (and there would have to be atleast 4 A319s doing the turns) from other high frequency routes to the long 5-6 hours flights transcons. They have the extra expense of having to fill in those planes with others (probably 90 seat Mesa RJs). I think that is what the articles were saying---that it will be more expensive for the LCCs in the future to add new markets etc....compared to the Majors who have planes and people waiting to come back to work.(for less)
Bye Bye--General Lee
ivauir
SNIKT!
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2002
- Posts
- 1,476
I try to stay away from these threads (because the General writes so darn much - and I am too lazy to read all of it) but I want to enter the fray (I have no idea why).
I think everyone agrees that DAL (or any other legacy carrier) does need to lower their costs to be competetive, BUT I would contend that they'll NEVER get them where they need to be to compete against a well run LCC. There are simply too many factors beyond their control (part of the business model) that keep costs high (mixed fleet, hub and spoke etc). There needs to be something about the product that causes it to stand out. And just getting miles that add toward a European vacation is not enough for most passengers.
I guess what I am staying (General and freinds) is that I don't think the shake up is over. I am not going to quote a bunch of statistics or any analysts: I am too lazy, and you can always find an "expert"to support you position whatever it is. None of that would make me right anyway. The market forces at work do not care about our opinions (or where we went to college), so we'll all have to wait. I honestly wish the best for everyone, but I am pretty sure some are going to be disappointed. Maybe I am wrong, but I don't think it is going to be the guys flying the red bellied "warbirds".
I think everyone agrees that DAL (or any other legacy carrier) does need to lower their costs to be competetive, BUT I would contend that they'll NEVER get them where they need to be to compete against a well run LCC. There are simply too many factors beyond their control (part of the business model) that keep costs high (mixed fleet, hub and spoke etc). There needs to be something about the product that causes it to stand out. And just getting miles that add toward a European vacation is not enough for most passengers.
I guess what I am staying (General and freinds) is that I don't think the shake up is over. I am not going to quote a bunch of statistics or any analysts: I am too lazy, and you can always find an "expert"to support you position whatever it is. None of that would make me right anyway. The market forces at work do not care about our opinions (or where we went to college), so we'll all have to wait. I honestly wish the best for everyone, but I am pretty sure some are going to be disappointed. Maybe I am wrong, but I don't think it is going to be the guys flying the red bellied "warbirds".
FLB717
Pilot=proof of Gods humor
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2003
- Posts
- 627
TBAG
Delta Accidents (Remember DAL has the best record of the traditional big 5 Majors)
723, 31 July 1973 89 Lost
2605, 31 Oct 1979, 72 of 89 Lost (Western Airlines)
191, 2 Aug 1985, 137 Lost
To say that Valujet or any other carrier is deserving of an accident is horrible. To continuosly point it out in your post, cold and inhuman. I hope no one ever has an accident. It may not happen but it is a goal for all to share in. Delta does have a very good reputation for saftey, but all of us share in the peril, lets not wish, hope or gloat over any pilots or passengers misfortune.
Delta Accidents (Remember DAL has the best record of the traditional big 5 Majors)
723, 31 July 1973 89 Lost
2605, 31 Oct 1979, 72 of 89 Lost (Western Airlines)
191, 2 Aug 1985, 137 Lost
To say that Valujet or any other carrier is deserving of an accident is horrible. To continuosly point it out in your post, cold and inhuman. I hope no one ever has an accident. It may not happen but it is a goal for all to share in. Delta does have a very good reputation for saftey, but all of us share in the peril, lets not wish, hope or gloat over any pilots or passengers misfortune.
Last edited:
General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
Easy guys, please.
Ivauir,
Thanks for entering the fray. I know I write a lot, and I think every word is important, of course. I don't think Delta will get it's costs as low as a LCC, and that really is because--as a whole--Delta is NOT a LCC. We still have a full cost mainline service with First Class, and that also includes an INTL division that is not "People's Express" flying old 747s from EWR to Brussels for $99. So, we do have that first class service that is not always full, which means we lose some money. Now, we have also found a sector of the traffic that doesn't care about 1st class etc, and only wants cheap, nonstop travel. For those people, we initially had Delta Express which believe it or not, was actually a success---but had the wrong aircraft type. It was set up to combat Southwest's intended invasion of Florida back in 1996. Then Jetblue came along with a good product with TVs, and we decided that the 737 could not win that one, and a 757 with more seats, better fuel efficiency, and TVs and goofy flight attendants could compete, and it has done well so far. The buzz has been so good in fact, that Delta even opened a store in SoHo with Song trendy fashions (?), and will add more planes next year. The employees there (besides the pilots who will get some sort of paycuts) are paid less, and the planes are flown more per day. That part of Delta--Song--can be run like a LCC. The rest of Delta with a 1st class product etc...CANNOT really without dirt cheap labor. (and Dirt cheap management---which AINT gonna happen it seems) I hope that is short enough for you.
Bye Bye--General Lee
Ivauir,
Thanks for entering the fray. I know I write a lot, and I think every word is important, of course. I don't think Delta will get it's costs as low as a LCC, and that really is because--as a whole--Delta is NOT a LCC. We still have a full cost mainline service with First Class, and that also includes an INTL division that is not "People's Express" flying old 747s from EWR to Brussels for $99. So, we do have that first class service that is not always full, which means we lose some money. Now, we have also found a sector of the traffic that doesn't care about 1st class etc, and only wants cheap, nonstop travel. For those people, we initially had Delta Express which believe it or not, was actually a success---but had the wrong aircraft type. It was set up to combat Southwest's intended invasion of Florida back in 1996. Then Jetblue came along with a good product with TVs, and we decided that the 737 could not win that one, and a 757 with more seats, better fuel efficiency, and TVs and goofy flight attendants could compete, and it has done well so far. The buzz has been so good in fact, that Delta even opened a store in SoHo with Song trendy fashions (?), and will add more planes next year. The employees there (besides the pilots who will get some sort of paycuts) are paid less, and the planes are flown more per day. That part of Delta--Song--can be run like a LCC. The rest of Delta with a 1st class product etc...CANNOT really without dirt cheap labor. (and Dirt cheap management---which AINT gonna happen it seems) I hope that is short enough for you.
Bye Bye--General Lee
LCC Profits
General Lee and T-Bags,
As a retired pilot for the predecessor of Delta Intl I wanted to give you the benefit of my vast experience watching a bloated old airline and how it can go down the tubes. lol ALPA negotiators, consultants and bankers will help you get there and Intl. routes won't save you. Be careful out there.....it's dangerous to your lifestyle.
And yes, despite what you say, I believe you are intimidated by the LCC start-ups and "whistling past the graveyard."
FYI I turned down a job with Delta in 1963. That was in the good old days when they had a preponderance of Navy Pilots, who I am sure would not try to win the airline war on an Internet thread. gggg
General Lee and T-Bags,
As a retired pilot for the predecessor of Delta Intl I wanted to give you the benefit of my vast experience watching a bloated old airline and how it can go down the tubes. lol ALPA negotiators, consultants and bankers will help you get there and Intl. routes won't save you. Be careful out there.....it's dangerous to your lifestyle.
And yes, despite what you say, I believe you are intimidated by the LCC start-ups and "whistling past the graveyard."
FYI I turned down a job with Delta in 1963. That was in the good old days when they had a preponderance of Navy Pilots, who I am sure would not try to win the airline war on an Internet thread. gggg
Dizel8
Douglas metal
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2003
- Posts
- 2,817
Dude,
I apologize if I offended you with the GED remark, i realize SWA only has a couple GED pilots. I just hate to see the same old COMPLETELY false "they don't pay their bills" line. It's been repeated refuted in the past, but I did you a diservice by lumping you into any group with "TY". "TY" likes to pretend the financials are all rosy at AT, even stating that they have been paying off all their debt. But when you ask him to post a link, he changes the subject. He really gets hissy when you post one that shows debt GOING UP at AT. As for SWA, why didn't they grow like a weed the last two years? AT and JB better mananged? NAH, SWA didn't want to leverage the heck out of themselves with the expectation that the majors would never gain back strength and retaliate. SWA doesn't have the notion that they can paint RJ's that have the IDENTICAL costs that the majors pay, and make them profitable with lower fares
F9,
You are wise. I don't think anyone at the legacy carriers has any illusions that this 'struggle" to return to long term profitablilty will be anything but tough. Likewise however, it is nieve to the extreme for the LCC's to think they suddenly invented sliced bread. A couple months ago I made the point that JBlus business model would lead to LOWER RASM (point to point). Of course I was scoffed at. But then the 3rd Q numbers showed per pax revenue down, and now a warning for Q4. At the same time RASM is going up at the H&S's. It's not about "gloating' it's about discussing the strengths and weaknesses of a certain business model.
Gen Lee,
DAL's AVERAGE casm will NOT go down by 30%, however the MARGINAL CASM WILL. I'm still waiting for someone to give me a rational argument that shows DALs cost per additional SM will be in line with current CASM.
FB,
was it you that pointed out that AT's CASM was going down as you added capacity? If so, BINGO, congratulations, you've got it figured out. AT doesn't need another HQ, TQ or MX dept. incremental costs are lower, which in turn lowers total CASM. the point WRT DAL is that I suspect AT can't add CASM's without adding jets (20% of CASM), DAL can. How's your gate Util? Are you employees maxed out? Will you have to add more to add flights? When you grow costs go down, when you shrink, they go up. that's why EVERY hub and spoker's costs went up while ALL the growing LCC's saw lower costs. If DAL starts adding back capacity, and your capacity growth stalls, the opposite effect will happen.
All,
I apologize for bringing up the Valudeath incident. I just have issues with TY's ignorance and lack of class. It is beyond belief to me that an Air carrier, that derives most of it's income from the greater hotlanta area would make snide denigrating remarks toward one of the largest employers, and providers of flying pax, in the city. The implication that a craftsman or just even any old blue collar worker is someone to be ridiculed by another "union" member is somewhat distasteful. But I got such a kick out of it I burned a copy of Ty's anti-HD employee "TY"raids and gave it to a buddy at church today (regional HD manager...). He wasn't amused. Note to "TY": If you want to denigrate your customers, at least be smart enough to remove your links to AT....
I DO NOT WORK AT DAL!!!!! NEVER HAVE!!!! NEVER WILL!!!!
I apologize if I offended you with the GED remark, i realize SWA only has a couple GED pilots. I just hate to see the same old COMPLETELY false "they don't pay their bills" line. It's been repeated refuted in the past, but I did you a diservice by lumping you into any group with "TY". "TY" likes to pretend the financials are all rosy at AT, even stating that they have been paying off all their debt. But when you ask him to post a link, he changes the subject. He really gets hissy when you post one that shows debt GOING UP at AT. As for SWA, why didn't they grow like a weed the last two years? AT and JB better mananged? NAH, SWA didn't want to leverage the heck out of themselves with the expectation that the majors would never gain back strength and retaliate. SWA doesn't have the notion that they can paint RJ's that have the IDENTICAL costs that the majors pay, and make them profitable with lower fares
F9,
You are wise. I don't think anyone at the legacy carriers has any illusions that this 'struggle" to return to long term profitablilty will be anything but tough. Likewise however, it is nieve to the extreme for the LCC's to think they suddenly invented sliced bread. A couple months ago I made the point that JBlus business model would lead to LOWER RASM (point to point). Of course I was scoffed at. But then the 3rd Q numbers showed per pax revenue down, and now a warning for Q4. At the same time RASM is going up at the H&S's. It's not about "gloating' it's about discussing the strengths and weaknesses of a certain business model.
Gen Lee,
DAL's AVERAGE casm will NOT go down by 30%, however the MARGINAL CASM WILL. I'm still waiting for someone to give me a rational argument that shows DALs cost per additional SM will be in line with current CASM.
FB,
was it you that pointed out that AT's CASM was going down as you added capacity? If so, BINGO, congratulations, you've got it figured out. AT doesn't need another HQ, TQ or MX dept. incremental costs are lower, which in turn lowers total CASM. the point WRT DAL is that I suspect AT can't add CASM's without adding jets (20% of CASM), DAL can. How's your gate Util? Are you employees maxed out? Will you have to add more to add flights? When you grow costs go down, when you shrink, they go up. that's why EVERY hub and spoker's costs went up while ALL the growing LCC's saw lower costs. If DAL starts adding back capacity, and your capacity growth stalls, the opposite effect will happen.
All,
I apologize for bringing up the Valudeath incident. I just have issues with TY's ignorance and lack of class. It is beyond belief to me that an Air carrier, that derives most of it's income from the greater hotlanta area would make snide denigrating remarks toward one of the largest employers, and providers of flying pax, in the city. The implication that a craftsman or just even any old blue collar worker is someone to be ridiculed by another "union" member is somewhat distasteful. But I got such a kick out of it I burned a copy of Ty's anti-HD employee "TY"raids and gave it to a buddy at church today (regional HD manager...). He wasn't amused. Note to "TY": If you want to denigrate your customers, at least be smart enough to remove your links to AT....
I DO NOT WORK AT DAL!!!!! NEVER HAVE!!!! NEVER WILL!!!!
Last edited:
Share this page
Latest resources
-
-
-
-
-
AC 90-89C - Amateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing HandbookAmateur-Built Aircraft and Ultralight Flight Testing Handbook
- Neal
- Updated:
