General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
Medflyer,
ATL is where we make the most money, and we believe we will win that battle. We carry more people with bigger airplanes through ATL, and have made it the busiest single airport in the world, in terms of passengers. You have to remember that we only have ONE union, and that the others do not make a lot more than industry standard. The pilots (me), are negotiating to take some sort of cuts, which will lower costs even more. The reason our "CASM" is higher than most is because they add Comair/ASA's CASM (near 14.5) onto ours.
As far as Airtran is concerned, I am sure we know that they are there bringing fares down, but many of our passengers in ATL are connection passengers from cities that Airtran does not fly to. And, I am sure that they have a good frequent flyer program, but they do not offer the choices in cities that ours does with the Skyteam Alliance, nor do they offer the Crown Rooms, or better first class upgrades available.
StopNTSing,
We have a certain percentage in our contract (that we are renegotiating currently) that must be followed when it comes to INTL codeshares. We just filed a grievance concerning that, and two weeks ago they just announced all of that extra INTL flying for us. (CVG--FCO, AMS etc...) I doubt we will give up that. And, a lot of the cities we fly to INTL do not have much viable competition. Try JFK to Moscow. You can fly on us or Aeroflot. You choose. How about JFK to IST. Do you want to fly in the back of a Turk A340 for 11 hours? I didn't think so. How about ATL to Santiago, Chile? In fact, we ran KLM, Varig, Austrian, and Swissair out of ATL.
Drunkirishman,
Yes, we had some empty airplanes after 9-11. And a lot of empty airplanes in a 500 airplane fleet can really hurt your bottomline. It took awhile to get people back onboard, and the RJs helped keep market presence. As far as Mainline owning them, it would be nice for our furloughs to be flying instead of sitting right now, but I don't think they are the answer in the future. I think the LCCs are going to be charging less for seats, and the 50 seat RJ will not be able to cover the costs with just those 50 seats. I think we will need larger planes to compete, and the more seats will help spread out the costs. Look at Southwest--they can charge less but still have 100 or more seats to fill and spread out those costs. And, their pilots are getting paid more and more these days, which shows that pilot costs can still be high if you have the right plan.
SWADude,
I didn't know that your flight attendants weren't even paid the average. If that is the case, and your company continualy makes profits, then they should be compensated better. I have jumped on many of your flights, and I always had fun. I know that they often work 6-7 legs a day, and that they do work hard. But, as I have said, the regional flight attendants also clean the plane between flights, fly 6 legs a day, and are paid a lot worse than Southwest. But, Southwest is King, and they should pay your flight attendants more---period.
Bye Bye--General Lee
![Wink ;) ;)]()
ATL is where we make the most money, and we believe we will win that battle. We carry more people with bigger airplanes through ATL, and have made it the busiest single airport in the world, in terms of passengers. You have to remember that we only have ONE union, and that the others do not make a lot more than industry standard. The pilots (me), are negotiating to take some sort of cuts, which will lower costs even more. The reason our "CASM" is higher than most is because they add Comair/ASA's CASM (near 14.5) onto ours.
As far as Airtran is concerned, I am sure we know that they are there bringing fares down, but many of our passengers in ATL are connection passengers from cities that Airtran does not fly to. And, I am sure that they have a good frequent flyer program, but they do not offer the choices in cities that ours does with the Skyteam Alliance, nor do they offer the Crown Rooms, or better first class upgrades available.
StopNTSing,
We have a certain percentage in our contract (that we are renegotiating currently) that must be followed when it comes to INTL codeshares. We just filed a grievance concerning that, and two weeks ago they just announced all of that extra INTL flying for us. (CVG--FCO, AMS etc...) I doubt we will give up that. And, a lot of the cities we fly to INTL do not have much viable competition. Try JFK to Moscow. You can fly on us or Aeroflot. You choose. How about JFK to IST. Do you want to fly in the back of a Turk A340 for 11 hours? I didn't think so. How about ATL to Santiago, Chile? In fact, we ran KLM, Varig, Austrian, and Swissair out of ATL.
Drunkirishman,
Yes, we had some empty airplanes after 9-11. And a lot of empty airplanes in a 500 airplane fleet can really hurt your bottomline. It took awhile to get people back onboard, and the RJs helped keep market presence. As far as Mainline owning them, it would be nice for our furloughs to be flying instead of sitting right now, but I don't think they are the answer in the future. I think the LCCs are going to be charging less for seats, and the 50 seat RJ will not be able to cover the costs with just those 50 seats. I think we will need larger planes to compete, and the more seats will help spread out the costs. Look at Southwest--they can charge less but still have 100 or more seats to fill and spread out those costs. And, their pilots are getting paid more and more these days, which shows that pilot costs can still be high if you have the right plan.
SWADude,
I didn't know that your flight attendants weren't even paid the average. If that is the case, and your company continualy makes profits, then they should be compensated better. I have jumped on many of your flights, and I always had fun. I know that they often work 6-7 legs a day, and that they do work hard. But, as I have said, the regional flight attendants also clean the plane between flights, fly 6 legs a day, and are paid a lot worse than Southwest. But, Southwest is King, and they should pay your flight attendants more---period.
Bye Bye--General Lee