I didn't say we were going to change things, I said we could. I'm only trying to educated the uneducated while I have them in the seat for a few hours.
I don't agree with your version of education, especially after reading your post. I also think you're are preaching about false messiahs on the property that are going to overwhelm and change the pathetic status quo within CALALPA and ALPA National.
The problem is not with scabs, but it is deep seated problems of apathy borne by years of mistrust created by ALPA politics, political shenanigans and favoritism. Compounding the problem we have the behavior of CALALPA prior to contract 02 with the trip loss scandal and other areas of deception, lackluster performance and outright incompetence that is still continuing today.
I would just prefer they would admit they screwed up and we could move on.
You want people to admit to screwing up but where is your demand for accountability from ALPA for their actions prior to contract 02. While you are at it, how about getting ALPA to admit to the very damaging things to our careers that have transpired since, like age 65?
They only think of themselves, always have always will.
Your words betray you because I would say the same about you. You will never get people on your side with your divide and conquer thinking. More importantly though, we will never pull together as a whole with that manner of opinion.
We are divided but hopefully on our side. Say NO to a 150% pay for the right seat time, NO to picking up open time, and certainly NO to the first TA.
The interesting thing about the right seat, VJM and open time pick up is very few scabs have been doing this. I watched the pools and open time in August out of morbid curiosity and there were only 4 or 5 of the scabs that came up. I was up to about 55 names that were not 83 - 85 hires that were continually acting as company saviors.
Voting No means nothing without a credible strike threat or job action. With the state of SPSC and the P2P program management doesn't care about a no vote. In fact they will welcome it.
I'm just as worried as the next guy about this contract. I won't settle for less than what we deserve, even if I have to give up my job. I want the career back that we all singed up for not the run of the mill job it's become.
No disagreement there with me. But thinking this new blood is going to be some magic cure all or alienating segments of the list will not achieve that.
You like chewing up my post but you offer nothing. What do you suggest?
Your post is the least of what I take an issue with. It is your attitude.and divisiveness. I would suggest the first thing would be to toss your B3rd mentality and realize that to obtain the contract we deserve that every ones issues are important. I seriously take offense to your attitude of throwing any segment under the bus, no matter what excuse there is.
Now that is a very ignorant assumption. Does anyone that disagrees with your ideals, tactics and opinions are then labeled or assumed to be a scab? Just to humor you, I was in grade school in 1983
I have said it before I will say it again. When you talk to some of the more rational ones from the 83 -85 era, it is very frightening when you listen to their views about ALPA. They bring up the same problems they either experienced or discuss about ALPA happening today as it was 25 years ago within the union. Putting the rhetoric aside, that is not a good sign.
You and I want the same goals, but we are diametrically opposed in the methods of getting there.