The Costa Citationair

[jonjuan]

Certainly I can. Providing for the National Defense is Constitutional and the primary purpose of federal government. Providing for healthcare is not.

If goon is smart, he'll leave the discussion now.

 

[Sandhawk]

Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out!

I have a feeling you will never leave, or crawl back with some excuse.

+1

:beer:

 

[gret]

Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out!

I have a feeling you will never leave, or crawl back with some excuse.

Not very classy and it is doubtful that your ancestors that came to this country would be proud of your comments...

flyzimex...good luck with whatever path you choose.

 

[OHGOON]

Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out!

I have a feeling you will never leave, or crawl back with some excuse.

Wow, now that is an accomplishment in self-revelatory embarrasment!

This comment exemplifies why US Citizens are so beloved outside of our borders and so many expats now travel exclusively with their non US passports when abroad..

BTW: How did you come up with your handle? Was TeenyWeeny taken??

 

[OHGOON]

Certainly I can. Providing for the National Defense is Constitutional and the primary purpose of federal government. Providing for healthcare is not.

Actually was looking for an answer to my question and not another Cavutoesque soundbite, but if we must:

Let's see; by your logic then, the moon landings must be socialism because those too were not a "primary" purpose of the Feds in the Constitution.

Federal Highways, socialism, not mentioned in that 1780's doc.

CDC and ATC have to be immediately abandoned too because Washington, Jefferson and Company did not mention them either..

Wow this list of non Constitutional things could get pretty lengthy.

You "Strict Constructionists" are very entertaining.

All aboard, the train for the stone age is leaving the Reality Station at any moment now...

 

[OHGOON]

If goon is smart, he'll leave the discussion now.

I'm a pilot, how smart could I possibly be?:laugh:

 

[gunfyter]

Actually was looking for an answer to my question and not another Cavutoesque soundbite, but if we must:

Let's see; by your logic then, the moon landings must be socialism because those too were not a "primary" purpose of the Feds in the Constitution.

Federal Highways, socialism, not mentioned in that 1780's doc.

CDC and ATC have to be immediately abandoned too because Washington, Jefferson and Company did not mention them either..

Wow this list of non Constitutional things could get pretty lengthy.

You "Strict Constructionists" are very entertaining.

All aboard, the train for the stone age is leaving the Reality Station at any moment now...

No, by my logic taking property (by force) from people who it belongs to and giving it to other people to whom it does not belong is socialism.

Providing for the "general welfare" as perhaps the CDC does or Highways do is general welfare. Giving people free stuff like health care "Individual welfare" and therefore Socialism.

 

[OHGOON]

No, by my logic taking property (by force) from people who it belongs to and giving it to other people to whom it does not belong is socialism.

Providing for the "general welfare" as perhaps the CDC does or Highways do is general welfare. Giving people free stuff like health care "Individual welfare" and therefore Socialism.

I had no idea that Sweden was such a violent place. Imagine that, taking their hard earned meatballs at gunpoint and giving them away. :nuts:

Have you ever tried to look up the definition of socialism somewhere like Wikipedia? Let me help you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

I apologize that it's not as sexy as a five second soundbite from Fixed Noise Network but facts are messier by nature and usually take a little longer.

Now back to our little corner of the world. How exactly is one type of government spending good and right (military budget) and another (healthcare) bad and wrong or "socialism."

Please try explain this time without hiding behind holy documents like the Constitution, Bible etc. I have copies of both at home, but like the phone book, it's not daily reading material..

Thank you

 

[gunfyter]

Right ... you rely on Wikipedia... :laugh:

I rely upon:

Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis
It is the definitive refutation of nearly every type of socialism ever devised... a wide-ranging analysis of society, comparing the results of socialist planning with those of free-market capitalism in all areas of life.

Socialism always involves force. If not, we wouldn't be forcing people to pay for Obama Care. That's why its wrong... taking other people's property to give to others. We don't take some people's property to give to others when running the military or building roads or running the CDC.

It also doesn't work ... the law does nothing to increase the supply of Doctors. But it increases the Demand for Doctors by subsidizing use of their services. When you increase Demand without increasing the
supply you always get Higher Costs. Its a plan doomed to failure....

 

[BlueNose]

I'm a pilot, how smart could I possibly be?:laugh:

Maybe you should just go relax and enjoy a Twinkie. Oh wait, never mind.

 

[OHGOON]

Maybe you should just go relax and enjoy a Twinkie. Oh wait, never mind.

Hahahah...oh wait never mind.:0

 

[OHGOON]

Right ... you rely on Wikipedia... :laugh:

I rely upon:
Socialism always involves force. If not, we wouldn't be forcing people to pay for Obama Care. That's why its wrong... taking other people's property to give to others. We don't take some people's property to give to others when running the military or building roads or running the CDC.

It also doesn't work ... the law does nothing to increase the supply of Doctors. But it increases the Demand for Doctors by subsidizing use of their services. When you increase Demand without increasing the
supply you always get Higher Costs. Its a plan doomed to failure....

Yes of course, Wikipedia, so laughable, but relying solely on theories expoused by one very biased character who at times in his life was associated with the John Birch society and acted as an apologist for European fascism, is supposed to be taken seriously? Sorry, just can't follow you there, nice try though.

How exactly is Obamacare forcing anything on you or others? Why is that different than paying for the military or the CDC? Both items in the Federal Budget are paid with Federal Tax Dollars. Why is Healthcare in your mind forcefully taken from you while military spending is not? Looks to be the exact same process. Federal Tax Dollars are spent on both items. Hence my original question, which you have so far artfully dodged. How is one considered good and constitutional and the other bad and "socialistic?"

It would be so helpful if you actually attempted to justify your prejudicial preferences before drowning yourself in meaninglessly self serving propaganda.

 

[G4dude]

I had no idea that Sweden was such a violent place. Imagine that, taking their hard earned meatballs at gunpoint and giving them away. :nuts:

Have you ever tried to look up the definition of socialism somewhere like Wikipedia? Let me help you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

I apologize that it's not as sexy as a five second soundbite from Fixed Noise Network but facts are messier by nature and usually take a little longer.

Now back to our little corner of the world. How exactly is one type of government spending good and right (military budget) and another (healthcare) bad and wrong or "socialism."

Please try explain this time without hiding behind holy documents like the Constitution, Bible etc. I have copies of both at home, but like the phone book, it's not daily reading material..

Thank you

The problem isn't violence, it is the fact that the State is the only entity legally empowered to use force against the citizens. This is why you have to be careful what you have the State do. Some things the State should do, but many areas are much better served by the private sector, or local or state government, usually the more local the more efficacious.
The Constitution is important because it is the rule book designed to make sure charismatic people are not given too much power by the people, which power then being inherited by less virtuous folks, by which time the State function under discussion is irreversible. This explains the reference to "a nation of laws, not of men."

 

[dustrpilot]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFALonjLay0&sns=em

A little one the long side, but well worth watching.

 

[gunfyter]

Yes of course, Wikipedia, so laughable, but relying solely on theories expoused by one very biased character who at times in his life was associated with the John Birch society and acted as an apologist for European fascism, is supposed to be taken seriously? Sorry, just can't follow you there, nice try though.

How exactly is Obamacare forcing anything on you or others? Why is that different than paying for the military or the CDC? Both items in the Federal Budget are paid with Federal Tax Dollars. Why is Healthcare in your mind forcefully taken from you while military spending is not? Looks to be the exact same process. Federal Tax Dollars are spent on both items. Hence my original question, which you have so far artfully dodged. How is one considered good and constitutional and the other bad and "socialistic?"

It would be so helpful if you actually attempted to justify your prejudicial preferences before drowning yourself in meaninglessly self serving propaganda.

Who is this individual you are talking about? Mises was a classical Liberal. Today what we call Libertarian ... Not a fascist. Fascism is a brand of Socialism.

I've answered your question several times. Obama Care steals money from people and gives it to other people. That's different from Defense and CDC. Those do not steal money to give to others.

[SIZE=+1]Vladimir Lenin: “Socialized Medicine is the Keystone to the Arch of the Socialist State.”[/SIZE]

“Would socialized medicine lead to socialization of other phases of life? Lenin thought so. He declared socialized medicine is the keystone to the arch of the socialist state.”
1945 AMA Pamphlet Warning

 

[Sparse]

BTW Sparse, since that "change it back" thing didn't quite work out, can we expect a new and improved avatar anytime soon?
:beer:

Ok Goon here it is. In four years I will be a fully retired aviator, living off my full SS, medicare/obamacare, enjoying my lump sum retirement and you will be paying for it.

Fast Forward is my new motto.

 

[Smooth Cruz]

how is citationair doing now?

 

[Sparse]

how is citationair doing now?

Huge question mark. The half glass full side would say in theory we can make it in the business model CA is pursuing but changes are coming in pay, schedule, and QoL. The half glass empty side would say that we will be shuttered in about a year. Neither scenario looks good.

 

[OHGOON]

Ok Goon here it is. In four years I will be a fully retired aviator, living off my full SS, medicare/obamacare, enjoying my lump sum retirement and you will be paying for it.

Fast Forward is my new motto.

I like it!

You forgot the blue background & the donkey though.

BTW: All of us pay for your & everyone else's stuff, just a matter of how & when. Not really that shocking or horrible. It's called civilization.

Hope you'll be able to enjoy your retirement for a long time.
:beer:

 

[OHGOON]

Who is this individual you are talking about? Mises was a classical Liberal. Today what we call Libertarian ... Not a fascist. Fascism is a brand of Socialism.

Sorry, I looked up your hero's bio. He was associated with the John Birch Society & he was a longtime apologist for European fascism. He may be an old "liberal" ie. libertarian, but that does not make the man any cleaner about his obviously racist world views.

I've answered your question several times. Obama Care steals money from people and gives it to other people. That's different from Defense and CDC. Those do not steal money to give to others.

Repeating the same thing over and over again still does not answer my question. Both the military and Obamacare receive Tax Dolllars. So once again why is a program that directly benefits civilians considered socialistic while the military is doing the same but somehow that type of spending is different. I for one see my Tax Dollars forcibly misspent on unnecessary and illegal wars while taking care of all citizen's health preventively through public access is somehow seen as evil. Both budget items are paid by Federal Tax Dollars. They are the same except obviously in your mind, therefore I'm still waiting for an explanation as to why?