The Costa Citationair

[GooseHZ]

Sal, Frac got OWNED!....

 

[FRACTRASH]

Now I'm a wife beater! Did I just turn back the clock 25 years. I't feels like the childish nonsense that went on in High School. When there's another view that differs from your own, you always resort to name calling. If you represent what the Teamsters are all about and I believe you do, who in their right mind would want to be apart of such an organization?

Their is a connection between Obama and organized labor, especially the Teamsters. How do you think the Laws that favor a Union got put in place. Like a No vote is a voter for you guys, really! That sounds fair. Hell, if it wasn't for that alone we probably wouldn't be having this conversation.

 

[OHGOON]

Their is a connection between....???

There is a connection vs it's their connection... Let me help: http://www.diffen.com/difference/Their_vs_There

(...there, who said you can never learn anything useful during their FI browsing time? )

I was going to try to point out that Obama was not yet born when in the 1930's all those laws that favored railroads' management "got put in place"...but what's the point of even attempting rational conversation with someone who continuously demonstrates his utter lack of command of even his own language...never mind knowledge of the facts or any kind of historical perspective.

You and Sallyboy make quite a team. Redefining the concept of low information voter, priceless if it weren't so sad for our pilot group...I'll bet that neither of you even got the Benedict Arnold reference? I'll give you a hint, he did not manage Obama's campaign...nor does he work for the Teamsters...

Oh btw: "Now I'm a wife beater!" vs "Now I'm a wife beater?" Punctuation is not one of your talents either would be my guess, or are you trying to emphasize that you are proud that we found you out? LOL!

 

[X-rated]

It's hard to believe pilots who are, if their lucky going to be bought by someone else, really considering abandoning every hard earned legal right they can bring to bear in that situation for a cocktail of vague and unsubstantiated promises and threats.

I believe you meant they're, or they are... oops..

 

[gret]

Not to dwell on the matter but...I'm not sure the punctuation is correct with this statement-

​

"I'll bet that neither of you even got the Benedict Arnold reference?"

Doesn't get close to damage the has been done when some use mute versus moot...or heaven forbid...moat.

 

[Sparse]

Meanwhile, what's going on at citation air?

 

[Praetorian]

So, the usual anti union suspects show up to defend the anti union, barely literate, drunk poster, wife beater guy?

Come on, choose your battles. This guys not worth splitting hairs over.

He's a minor player. At best.

Plus... Ogoon did legitimately own him.

 

[OHGOON]

I believe you meant they're, or they are... oops..

OOPS is right! Nice to know that there is always a way to be brought back down to earth... Guess I had it coming, doesn't change a thing though when it comes down to the Union or no Union at CA.

It would be adding insult to injury if we voluntarily gave up the last bargaining chip we have left just because some of us cannot separate ideology from reality. Which part of at least there would be someone fighting for our seniority rights vs having no rights what so ever is not clear to anyone reasonable during a SLI?

Anyone new would have to deal with us as one group vs just being at their mercy as individuals.

 

[OHGOON]

Not to dwell on the matter but...I'm not sure the punctuation is correct with this statement-

"I'll bet that neither of you even got the Benedict Arnold reference?"

Doesn't get close to damage the has been done when some use mute versus moot...or heaven forbid...moat.

or to the damage that has... vs "to damage the has..." Karma is a bitch as X-Rated pointed out to me earlier...

 

[X-rated]

So, the usual anti union suspects show up to defend the anti union, barely literate, drunk poster, wife beater guy?

Come on, choose your battles. This guys not worth splitting hairs over.

He's a minor player. At best.

Plus... Ogoon did legitimately own him.

Praetorian, I've made an extra effort not to pick on you lately, but this response is beneath you. You can't make that big of a deal about the proper use of "there, their, and they're right after you make the same mistake and not expect to be called on it. Even OHGOON says it's fair.

OHGOON obviously writes well. I think he can handle it.

 

[Praetorian]

Praetorian, I've made an extra effort not to pick on you lately, but this response is beneath you. You can't make that big of a deal about the proper use of "there, their, and they're right after you make the same mistake and not expect to be called on it. Even OHGOON says it's fair.

OHGOON obviously writes well. I think he can handle it.

Yea me too because, unlike gret, I don't think you do the message board thing for a living.

But don't presume to know what is "beneath" me. You really have know idea.

So breath easy. My only real point was that, all grammatical rhetoric aside, the wife beater guy is not worth your time, or the damage you do to your credibility by seemingly defending him.

But if that's hard for you, by all means, bring it on. I can also "handle it".

 

[WheresRocky]

Website with answers

Meanwhile, what's going on at citation air?

Great question Sparse.

There is now a central website with the latest updates on the future of the Costa Citation Air. This is the best response I could find:

http://www.theparbucklingproject.com

The latest and most comprehensive info on the sinking ship.

 

[X-rated]

I didn't defend him, mention him, or comment one way or another. Get a grip. My comment was one sentence on the proper use of word there. I mean their... err they're. You really are quite paranoid aren't you?

 

[Praetorian]

So angry.

 

[X-rated]

So angry.

Good one. :laugh:

Hello, Mr. Kettle?

 

[Praetorian]

Yea pot, that's probably fair.

 

[gret]

Yea me too because, unlike gret, I don't think you do the message board thing for a living.

But don't presume to know what is "beneath" me. You really have know idea.

So breath easy. My only real point was that, all grammatical rhetoric aside, the wife beater guy is not worth your time, or the damage you do to your credibility by seemingly defending him.

But if that's hard for you, by all means, bring it on. I can also "handle it".

I'm sitting here minding own business watching the WSOP on ESPN and all of sudden I see my handle flash by...what the heck did I do?

I'm sensitive and won't be able to sleep well this evening because of this lame attempt to bait me into a discussion.

 

[gret]

or to the damage that has... vs "to damage the has..." Karma is a bitch as X-Rated pointed out to me earlier...

Good evening OHGOON...not sure if karma had anything to do with it...was rewriting the final sentence when my best friend barked because he needed to do his business outside and I hit reply without proofreading.

Weak excuse I know...but it is true...normally make these types of errors when I've had a couple of gin and tonics.

 

[Praetorian]

Naw that was just unbridled contempt. Keep watchen your show.

 

[gret]

Not to be petty and stoop to your level, but what the heck-

"Unbridled"...?....Geez...I thought you represented the other end of the horse. ​

Couldn't help myself and I do apologize....