Thank You Ralph Nader!

[2000flyer]

The democratic party has been in denial and confusion for several years now, beginning with the senate and house. They still feel they are not to blame for the 2000 election loss.

To date we have the dem's blaming the following for their 2000 loss: Florida supreme court, US supreme court, Jeb Bush, Katherine Harris, Ralph Nader, etc. I believe the American people were sick and tired of Clintonesque politics, of which Al Gore was party too. They also saw what a bumbling idiot Al Gore is. Even today he holds no credibility in the party as Dean can attest to. He picks the coldest day in recent history in New York to spew his beliefs on global warming. Clinton got Clark in the race. How'd that work out? American's are much brighter than the democrats give them credit.

Mainly I, personally, feel the American people are finally seeing through the Democratic mantra of "for the average American." In truth, their as much for wealth and distinct class lines as anyone. How can you feel confident and trustful of a dem (or any politician) who tells you they're "working to make your middle-class life better" then jumps into the limo and is whisked off to one of his/her multi-million dollar homes? As for Kerry and his "I know the middle-class pain and concerns so I'll take a second mortgage out on my $12M home and Renoir collection to finance my campaign"...give me a break. You no nothing of the pain and worries of the majority of Americans.

Is any poitician concerned about jobs when they nearly unanimously vote themselves a pay raise every year, usually in the middle of the night so it gets no news coverage until the next cycle?

Sadly, only the weathly (Dem, Rep, Ind. and all) can afford to run for office anymore. How many of you can raise $100M or more to run? We need choices and vote for whoever we feel will best represent our needs. Thats our constitutional right.

2000Flyer

 

[njcapt]

For an alternative the the Republican party check out the platform of the Constution [sic] Party.

Constution Party Platform

The Constitution Party is the only party which is completely pro-life, anti-homosexual rights, pro-American sovereignty, anti-globalist, anti-free trade, anti-deindustrialization, anti-unchecked immigration, pro-second amendment, and against the constantly increasing expansion of unlawful police laws, in favor of a strong national defense and opposed to unconstitutional interventionism.

Yeah, I say we let them siphon off the reactionary, bunker-in-the-backyard, fundamentalist types out of the Republican constituency - just like Nader stands to do with the Democrats.

Fuking Ralph Nader. I read the platform of his party and tend to agree with a lot of their points. It's just that I have followed that socially retarded know-it-all for years, and will strenuously fight anything he is associated with. Fortunately, it appears that a lot of the people who supported him in 2000 are still pizzed off that he tanked the election and allowed George Bush to squeak his way into office. Hopefully, he will be resoundingly shouted down as the lame attention grabber he is and let Bush and Kerry duke it out.

 

[TWA Dude]

I believe the American people were sick and tired of Clintonesque politics, of which Al Gore was party too. They also saw what a bumbling idiot Al Gore is.

Excellent point! That sure does explain why 500,000 more people voted for Gore than Bush in 2000.

(read sarcasm)

P.S. I wonder who the Supreme Court will elect president this year?

 

[jarhead]

How many votes did Pat Buchannan "siphon" off from GWB? Hmmmm? There is no constitutional right for there to be only two candidates running for the highest office in the land. I'd like to see a dozen choices or more. Kinda like the California governors race. Choice is what it's all about. That's why we get to vote. To choose.

 

[ilinipilot]

Ralph Nader is an EGOmaniac

This is NOT about the issues and never ever will be if he runs as a third party candidate. If this was truly about the issues then how he would do anything in his power to get those issues to the fore front.

Contrast these two scenarios:
1. He runs as a 3rd party guys wins 4% of the vote, bush wins by a mark of 49% to 47%. NONE of his causes get advanced and bush is relelected.

2. Nader sucks in his ego, and supports a DEM nominee. He can bring in votes so that will mean he can carry some influuence with the nominee. And he can get his issues dealt with because a person he helped elect will be in office and that person. AND his supporters will be voting for the nominee so now the numbers could swing to the Dem nominee.

Lastly ALL nader does is create fear in the Public. How could any airline pilot support him after he wrote that book about airplane safety. What did that accomplish nothing, all it did was make flyers more nervous in and industry that is THE safest in the world.

As you can tell I am very opinionated in this issue. I hope people have a clear head when voting and vote with their minds and not vote on passion.

Thanks for reading
D

 

[jarhead]

illinipilot

You have every right to be opinionated. I support that far more than apathy. Stick to what you believe in. The rest of America should do the same.

Question----Is Al Sharpton an ego maniac? Was Wes Clark, Howard Dean, Dick Gephart, et al also full of "ego"? I doubt that any candidate for any office in the land does not have an ego. They believe they have the best ideas. It's then up to the voters to sort it all out.

 

[Timebuilder]

P.S. I wonder who the Supreme Court will elect president this year?

Since you are probably an intelligent man, I won't stoop to insult you for that hamhanded attempt at humor. I will, however, set you straight.

The Florida court had been cautioned by the Supremes to not try and "cherry pick" certain counties for recounts. These counties were seen as being likely places where the Florida democrats could maneuver the recount to fit their agenda. The Supremes said no, this wasn't within the scope of their judicial mandate, and the election stood, as finished.

So, this idea tha the Supreme Court "placed" Bush in office is whimsical democrat storytelling, or as the rest of us know it, a LIE.

Back to the thread topic, Nader just made a speech at the National Press Club. He used all of the expected keywords, such as "big business", "worker", "corporate", "private financing", and a whole laundry list of other words that are part and parcel to any good socialist call-to-arms.

God bless this man.

 

[jarhead]

I think Kerry, Edwards, Kucinitch and Sharpton, and all other Democrat candidates should get out of the race. They're just siphoning off votes from Ralph Nader, thus assuring GWB another 4 years.

 

[ilinipilot]

Great point but at least wes Clark came out and supported a nominee when he bowed out. He said I want whats good for the party and that i respect. He has enough decency to swallow his own pride when he cant succeed.

He could run as an independant but chose not too, hopefully for the good of the party.

I agree they all have egos, but there comes a time and a place where if your ego is bigger than the causes you are fighting for they why do it. If you care about your causes then you should do whatever you can to advance your causes even if it means, supporting someone else.

Thanks
D

 

[Capt. Tex]

So, this idea tha the Supreme Court "placed" Bush in office is whimsical democrat storytelling, or as the rest of us know it, a LIE.

You keep telling yourself that, night after night, if it helps you sleep.