Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWAPA NC resigns

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

scoreboardII

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Posts
2,694
Direct from CK the sheeple:
Our NC resigned this week after over four years of long, demanding work

Sweet. Nothing like giving up half-way through. No wonder the TA sucked.
 
Direct from CK the sheeple:
Our NC resigned this week after over four years of long, demanding work

Sweet. Nothing like giving up half-way through. No wonder the TA sucked.

They worked four years to get the TA, they forward the TA to the membership as the best they could do, the membership rejects the TA as not good enough, you state it "sucked", after that rebuke what do you expect them to do? The right thing to do is resign and allow those who think there is more meat on the bone an opportunity to go get it.

If the TA "sucked", why would you want them as your negotitors? Obviously you think the product they produced after four years was far below expectations. Why not volunteer yourself to fill their shoes?
 
They worked four years to get the TA, they forward the TA to the membership as the best they could do, the membership rejects the TA as not good enough, you state it "sucked", after that rebuke what do you expect them to do? The right thing to do is resign and allow those who think there is more meat on the bone an opportunity to go get it.

If the TA "sucked", why would you want them as your negotitors? Obviously you think the product they produced after four years was far below expectations. Why not volunteer yourself to fill their shoes?

Well said Sir!
 
Wow, that's some professionalism right there. They came up with a TA that failed by a few percent and they give up? Wimps.
 
The views expressed...

Direct from CK the sheeple:
Our NC resigned this week after over four years of long, demanding work

Sweet. Nothing like giving up half-way through. No wonder the TA sucked.

The views expressed by this no talent - a$$ clown do not reflect the rest of the group.

Scoreboard, why don't you volunteer to assist the new NC. Then you'll actually get closer to seeing the big picture.

Another wasted seniority number...

LJ
 
The views expressed by this no talent - a$$ clown do not reflect the rest of the group.

Scoreboard, why don't you volunteer to assist the new NC. Then you'll actually get closer to seeing the big picture.

Another wasted seniority number...

LJ

The views expressed by this mud-slinging moron do not reflect the rest of the group.

Usually when the going gets tough, we toughen up and get 'er done. We don't just quit in a huff.

Another wasted seniority number...
 
YEAH!!!! NC was completely out of touch. Best they could do well then now we can get people who can do a good job.
 
Well that should make all the barn burners happy. After all, they were calling for the resignation of the BoD AND the NC.
I think FDJ is spot on. I believe the old saying "damned if you do, damned if you don't" applies here.
So to everyone that knocked CK for his "great challenges ahead" comment, I guess it now begins.


SLC
:cool:
 
Outsider's perspective, but if the product didn't meet the muster of over half the pilot force maybe a fresh perspective is a good thing. Doesn't mean the guys leaving are "wimps", or bad guys in any way, shape, or form. However, they obviously don't have the pulse of the masses so moving on might be best for everyone.

Having been a rock thrower at another carrier for a while, I can tell you union work is the classic committee work. Every individual input matters, but no one individual can ever do anything alone. Its slow, slogging, frustrating work at times. Personally, I think a certain amount of turnover is good for both the membership and the union. The union gets fresh blood and perspective periodically, and MORE pilots are involved which increases their exposure to the ins and outs of union work. If you sit back all the time and let "those union guys..." do all your work, odds are they'll end up out of touch and the line pilots won't like the product. For the union to be "us", we have to step up here and there and offer our services. Otherwise, the company is "them", the union is "them", and nobody ever is satisfied.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top