Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWAPA/ALPA negotiate settlement

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
There really isn't any "negotiating" going on anymore. The sides are meeting and some "offers" may cross the table, but nothing will happen. Swapa is done giving and the Tran boys are feeling too entitled. It will go to arbitration, period. The only remaining question is what will GK do? I have a pretty good idea it will not be what the AirTran pilots want to have happen. We shall see. To bad it's going to crash and burn when it could have been a very successful acquisition.
Among others, that was just a couple of days ago, CaptWidgeon. If SWAPA is "really" not going to negotiate, why did they invite the AT team back to Dallas for further negotiations? That is not bargaining in good faith.
 
Nindiri,

I think you are confusing yourself. The AT MC already agreed to a deal. The MEC, who by the way directs the MC, decided to vote no. So who is negotiating in bad faith?
 
Nindri your misinformed!

Yes, they definitely promised a staple or near-staple. It's not exactly a secret, it's been in the news and was even discussed on the SWA pilots' own message board.

I don't understand why SWAPA made that promise. Surely they knew that SWA pilots would expect them to follow through with it.

Your obviously a Troll. Your above statement is completely FALSE!
 
Nindiri,

I think you are confusing yourself. The AT MC already agreed to a deal. The MEC, who by the way directs the MC, decided to vote no. So who is negotiating in bad faith?

Again, someone who has NO idea of how NC/MC/MEC relationships in negotiations work.

Ignorance is bliss, I guess.
 
Sorry, obadie, but the staple promise is an established fact. That's why the junior SWA pilots were so angry that the proposed SLI was not a complete staple. You can read about it on your own SWA pilots' message board.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, obadie, but the staple promise is an established fact. That's why the junior SWA pilots were so angry that the proposed SLI was a complete staple. You can read about it on your own SWA pilots' message board.


False. Prove it.
 
Prove what? That the radical SWA FO's were not happy with the SLI? That's pretty easy, just look back at all the posts complaining about it being too generous to AT pilots.
 
Among others, that was just a couple of days ago, CaptWidgeon. If SWAPA is "really" not going to negotiate, why did they invite the AT team back to Dallas for further negotiations? That is not bargaining in good faith.

In light of the email sent by Linden and the comments surfacing on this thread, I'll repeat here my post on another thread stating comments made by MC and MEC members during the Paschal's meeting yesterday (Look at item 2):

my comments will be in red. i'm sure you've seen this before.

Well, I'll offer my 2 cents as to the Paschal's meeting yesterday:

Linden, Todd, Frank Early and even ALPA National President Capt. Lee Moak made a brief appearance.

These comments are what I was able to gather from being there quite a while. (Don't shoot the messenger)

1. Frank asked everyone to stay relaxed and remember that SL9 and the AIP are behind us. Moving forward, they have our feel for what we want and Attorney Katz is working on converting them to legal terms. Because of legal purposes, he could not disclose anything else on this.

2. They (MC) will not accept a negotiated settlement unless it provides significant improvements in pure seniority (no letters, no protections, no conditions, etc). Frank feels that the odds of that occurring are highly unlikely and we are on a continued course towards arbitration.
to me this looks like they aren't going in with the most open minds. can you bargain in faith with a closed mind?

3. Our MC/Attorneys declined to extend arbitration because "they are ready right now to continue". SW suggested extending the arbitration process by up to 3 additional months because they don't think they'll be able to achieve SOC at the original time-frame.
in my opinion this is an opportunity to bargain for a few more months, you know, let's see if we can't do something. mc/atty's, naw, we want "right now". not really team players here.

4. Interestingly enough was that Frank mentioned that at the beginning of this week there was very little interest in SWAPA wanting to meet again before mediation began. After GK met with SWAPA earlier this week they made a 180 and now want to meet again with our MC and "talk". Frank thinks that it's something GK might have said to them. As they requested, our MC is headed back there again on Tuesday to meet with SW/SWAPA.
we do realize mr kelly holds the check book. i have noooo idea what he told swapa. granted, they apparently didn't want to talk anymore either, until the boss man, who has been instrumental all along the way here, said something. bottom line, looks like swapa was willing to at least 'talk', more than aai was willing to do.

5. Contrary to beliefs on the line, Frank said that the communications channels are quite open and they really do have good communications with SWA management. He said that SWA management are well aware of our hard work and warrior spirit. They know we embrace the SWA culture.

6. Integration continues and there are NO actions taking place to make them believe that it will not happen. He said that one big RED FLAG to look for would be if SWA retires their SOC request to the FAA and of course, there's no indication at all of this.
except mr kelly did say he may not get it in the original time frame. might mean something, then again maybe not.

7. Another remark made was that the only other problem that could exist was that the arbitrated list would be so great (he used the word "Home Run") for us that SWAPA could not swallow it and that GK would not be able to convince them by throwing $$ into the pot for them and thereby seriously affecting their culture. Frank didn't think that the arbitrated list would be so amazing for us to put us in that position.
hope frank's crystal ball is working good, there's a lot on the line here to be guessing about this.

8. Capt Moak briefly spoke to us and told us that ALPA National would give us their full support and then answered some questions.

9. Linden said that whether you were for or against the proposed SLI that NOW was the time for all of us to unite and move forward to end this process. He said that SWAPA was united and so should we from now on.

Yes, I'd say unofficially that there were well over 200 guys show up over all.

I left the meeting feeling very good about our odds and truly hope the answers I received there are manifested into hard action.

Oy yes, Frank did offer a hug to whoever needed one ! (LOL)

Again, these are not my opinions but a recount of the comments I heard said yesterday.


- J.C. Feliciano

my opinion, what i take out of this info from the aai alpa meeting, at least swapa was willing to talk, mc/atty's said no. i guess if you're not at the table you can't have bad faith.
 
Prove what? That the radical SWA FO's were not happy with the SLI? That's pretty easy, just look back at all the posts complaining about it being too generous to AT pilots.

No, prove what you asserted.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top