outerlimits
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2011
- Posts
- 486
Look who's a lawyer?
I don't know if you'd go out of business or not? Pretty sure not. But I think you guys have gotten soft and fat and you don't want it as bad as I do. I simply want to compete. I want to defend my job and my company. I want what most of us want, competition on a level playing field. All of us at IAH, OR all of us at Hobby. I don't care.
Why was it ok for your airline to fly against the whole industry with lower pay and no pension for 25 years? But if I don't object to it, and AA does it, it's wrong? Worked pretty good for you in the end....
WOW WOW and WOW
If all should be at IAH or HOU, should not the whole industry follow ?
All flying must be flown out of LAX, JFK. MIA ,ORD just to name a few. No more several airports in any city.
PS As far as no pension, I heard they get profit sharing and 401k which is there money no mater what happens to the airline. I head some of there pilots retiring with almost 4M, to me that seems better that CAL or UAL pension
How much money are the UAL and CAL pilots retiring with in there pension?
Last edited: