Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA wants to fly from HOU to MEX and SouthAmerica

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Mayor leaning toward saying YES to SWA

icon1.png
Houston Mayor Thoughts on Hobby

Chron.com

Mayor: Hobby expansion good for Houston

It was not a formal recommendation to grant Southwest Airlines permission to expand its operations at Hobby Airportso it can start international flights, but after Wednesday’s Council meeting Mayor Annise Parker made perhaps her strongest statement to date in favor of the proposal.

Parker will not make a formal recommendation to Council until at least next month. First, there’s a May 8 hearing at which Southwest lays out why the city should grant it permission to build a Customs facility and five gates at Hobby and United Airlines argues why it would be a bad idea for Houston. The city is also scheduling meetings in Hobby’s District I and Bush Intercontinental’s District B to gather community input.

But Parker appeared to show her hand yesterday when asked about the battle over Hobby. She said:

I have looked at the legal issues. I have looked at the economic issues. I tend to discount economic studies as always being overly optimistic, but there’s no question in my mind that we have an obligation to allow Southwest to proceed at their expense to construct the new terminals and there’s no doubt in my mind that it will enhance competitiveness in the market and be good for the citizens of Houston.

The study to which she refers was commissioned by the Houston Airport System and concludes that expanding Hobby would create 10,000 jobs and inject $1.6 billion into the local economy annually. United disputes that and is wrapping up its own study.

Mayor’s spokeswoman Janice Evans confirmed that the statement was not an official endorsement of the Hobby plan.

“We are still moving forward with stakeholder meetings and gathering information. She will make her formal recommendation when we’ve gathered that information,” Evans told me this morning.

Share
 
There is so much accurate and thoroughly vetted data that would have to be ignored for the City to allow this, it simply should not happen.


30 something pages WOW.

Hey Flop answer me one question. What issue exactly is before the city of Houston?
 
All I want to hear out of you is: "Yup, you showed me proof". You said if I produced it, you would acknowledge it...

And as soon as you show proof, I'll acknowledge it. So far, hasn't happened. And I don't think it ever will.
 
Here's proof:

But Parker appeared to show her hand yesterday when asked about the battle over Hobby. She said:

I have looked at the legal issues. I have looked at the economic issues. I tend to discount economic studies as always being overly optimistic, but there’s no question in my mind that we have an obligation to allow Southwest to proceed at their expense to construct the new terminals and there’s no doubt in my mind that it will enhance competitiveness in the market and be good for the citizens of Houston.
 
The mayor isn't the issue- its the city council that will make the decision.
Don't under-estimate UALs influence over them- write letters and sign the petition-
The only way FOs are getting to the left seat is to grow- we need this for that.
The city council has to know there will be a national backlash against them if they create a restriction here.
 
The mayor isn't the issue- its the city council that will make the decision.
Don't under-estimate UALs influence over them- write letters and sign the petition-
The only way FOs are getting to the left seat is to grow- we need this for that.
The city council has to know there will be a national backlash against them if they create a restriction here.

You don't buy your Captains triple cheeseburgers from Wendy's ?
 
Hey man- that's the argument coming now about absenteeism- you want to upgrade before you're 60- help fight the slackers
 
You have a point. If we're cheaper from point A to point B, then fly us. If UAL is cheaper, fly them. Ditto Delta, Alaska, etc. Fly where you want to go on whoever's the cheapest. Passengers always have that choice.

Seeing as how you bring up that point, I'm assuming that you have no objection to SWA flying internationally out of HOU then. After all, if UAL is "as cheap if not cheaper," then UAL has nothing to worry about. Damn, we'll be lucky to fill a single plane out of HOU then.

Thanks for pointing this out (are you listening, Flopgut?); I'm sure glad you're on our side on this one, Taxicabdriver !

Bubba

Im a capitalist....Anyone can fly from wherever/whenever they want but I just think its funny how some attitudes come across as being all "high and mighty" like some of the SWA attitudes....if they start to fly intl out of HOU and do good, well good for them but this is not a guarantee
 
Im a capitalist....Anyone can fly from wherever/whenever they want but I just think its funny how some attitudes come across as being all "high and mighty" like some of the SWA attitudes....if they start to fly intl out of HOU and do good, well good for them but this is not a guarantee

Exactly..............
 
Wave, got the sick numbers for ya. We spent 500 mil in sick calls last year. Half a bil. That is 17 airplanes. Crazy
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top