scoreboardII
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2008
- Posts
- 2,694
That doesn't even rise to the level of "freebie" and you know it.Stayed at Love...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That doesn't even rise to the level of "freebie" and you know it.Stayed at Love...
Even if the City Council approves SWA's terminal, the FAA has to approve it also. The FAA has said in Assurance Grants 23 and 39 that HAS is not required to accomodate SWA. Underutilized FIS is available at IAH where there are currently 12 gates available. SWA has served the airport in the past and it is abundantly clear SWA left, and does not want to go back, to avoid competeing with UAL and the other IAH carriers. Additionally, the FAA recognizes that limiting certain aircraft operation to a single airport in a multi airport system is customary. A court case precedent, which is from Denver and an airline called Centennial, produced a final agency decision and order from the FAA stating that these limits may be imposed.
0900 the meeting kicks off. We'll see how it goes. I don't think SWA has done enough to win this. Overstated what the positives are to the City and been less than clear about how much they would actually pay for. If SWA get's this it will be a HUGE handout.
Couple of sidenotes: GK wants this limited to 737 size aircraft only, and he only wants 5 gates for 25 flights. He's making NO accomodation for any other operator or any other size airplane. It will be interesting to see if he get's those two requests approved. If it all comes together for him, it will be the most exaggerated accomodation of one airline's needs I think has ever happened.
One of the main reasons any legacy ends up with aweful mgt is that no quality leadership wants to manage against the ridiculous advantage SWA is usually given on issues like this.
I don't think anyone knows. GK really did put in the effort. He sat through questioning for 4.5 hours with no break. Meanwhile, my CEO was sipping congac from the shrunken, hollowed out head of a furloughed pilot...
I don't think anyone knows. GK really did put in the effort. He sat through questioning for 4.5 hours with no break. Meanwhile, my CEO was sipping congac from the shrunken, hollowed out head of a furloughed pilot...
There is no decision yet, that I know of. However, from what I saw I think a lot of people changed their mind about the UAL position on the issue.
Just to clarify, you mean SWA was able to sway a lot of opinions to their way of thinking?
But Southwest CEO Gary Kelly went further than he had in previous remarks on just how much of a commitment his company is willing to make.
“If we can reach an agreement with you, I’ll pay for the $100 million project,” Kelly said.
“We have built, we wrote the checks to build facilities in at least one other city,” Kelly said later in the hearing. “We are putting capital, $100***** million, on the table.” But later, when asked by a reporter if he meant that Southwest was willing to take the money from its profits or instead intended to use money from a $1.50-per-ticket increase in the Hobby passenger charge that’s passed to the Federal Aviation Administration, he said, “It’s all the same.”