Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA...Too Prepared???

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
They want someone who does not study for an interview but is more concerned about the NEXT guy getting the job instead of you.

OK, let me blow this theory out of the water. When I was leaving active duty AF, a squadronmate and I were trying to get hired at the same Guard unit. I knew that there was room for both of us; they were moving from ORD to Scott AFB.
In the interview, I was asked if they only had one to take, who would it be - him or me. I said to take him. I found out later that he had been asked the same question, but told them to take him. He didn't get hired at the Guard unit; I did.
Where's that backstabbing squadronmate now? At Southwest. I never applied there; my goal in life is to doze for dollars as a relief FO on the 777 or 747. United was a much better fit for me. Of course I've been furloughed for almost five years while he's been working at Southwest.
As for the squadronmate, I doubt that he changed for his Southwest interview.
 
this is one of the most constructive posts I have read. TurboS7...I think you have hit the nail in the head. SWA prides themselves around their warrior spirit, servant heart, and fun-luving attitude. Confident, yet humble. Takes the job seriously but not themselves. If they get the sense that you don't fit that mold...it won't work out. They are also the only airline to give most, if not all, a chance...no one else does that...goes back to humbleness. Look no further than Herb...that's how he is...and thats what he built. Like it was mentioned earlier...they interview way more than will ever hire. 40-70 slots per month after interviewing 200++. They get what they want, even if it means sacrificing a few good ones. Those that were sacrificed might be back and get hired the second, third, fourth, or even fifth time. Knowing all of this before the interview helps...it sure relaxed me knowing I might not get it...so just have fun...smile...what do you have to loose?
 
this is one of the most constructive posts I have read. TurboS7...I think you have hit the nail in the head. SWA prides themselves around their warrior spirit, servant heart, and fun-luving attitude. Confident, yet humble. Takes the job seriously but not themselves. If they get the sense that you don't fit that mold...it won't work out. They are also the only airline to give most, if not all, a chance...no one else does that...goes back to humbleness. Look no further than Herb...that's how he is...and thats what he built. Like it was mentioned earlier...they interview way more than will ever hire. 40-70 slots per month after interviewing 200++. They get what they want, even if it means sacrificing a few good ones. Those that were sacrificed might be back and get hired the second, third, fourth, or even fifth time. Knowing all of this before the interview helps...it sure relaxed me knowing I might not get it...so just have fun...smile...what do you have to loose?


Puddlejumper, I have defended SWA's requirement of a 737 rating to get hired against the perception that it is PFT. So please don't take this wrong, but I think the the type rating requirement proves you to be wrong. You see, they automatically disqualify a tremendous amount of applicants with their type rating requirement; applicants who might have tremendous amounts of that "servant heart". Or, you could look at it like this, the 737 type rating requirement is a "prequalifier". If that is the case, then I have to ask: How does possessing a 737 type rating help the PD indentify those who possess a "warrior spirit, a servant heart, and a fun luving attitude"?

I tend to think that SWA's criteria for hiring is somewhat more simple. They, like EVERY OTHER employer are looking for employees who are easily managed.

I, being somewhat independent, don't appear to fit the mold. LOL.

Still,
:-)
 
Or, you could look at it like this, the 737 type rating requirement is a "prequalifier". If that is the case, then I have to ask: How does possessing a 737 type rating help the PD indentify those who possess a "warrior spirit, a servant heart, and a fun luving attitude"?

)


I do like the fact that SWA does hire "qualified" pilots. Unlike other airlines that might hire low time family or interns, SWA does stick to the requirements. Why the 737? Why not? Every SWA pilot is "captain qualified" when they get hired. I dont think any other airline can say that. ( meaning total time, PIC time, turbine time and typed in aircraft). At least you cant say that they are unfairly hiring the minorities.

As far as requiring the type, it probably shows that you are commited to them. Remember, it wasnt too long ago that guys would leave SWA for UAL, AA, DAL.
 
It' s all bunch of bs do you all realize that?
Too many of us fliyng in the US

next question will be; how many hole has your right sock today?? and how aRE YOU GOING TO FIX THE SITUATION??
 
Last edited:
As for the squadronmate, I doubt that he changed for his Southwest interview.

Good post, but I must disagree. I used to think good acting was very hard to find among pilots, but a "good" military officer is very practiced at it. He was just outsmarted and failed the integrity/good bud test. Many of us military officer types fail it. (Not me!)

If you can act well enough in the interview you will make the FA's and gate agents feel at ease.

Albie,

A part of this acting biz is looking a little surprised at the questions. Did you know the SWA interviewers like to twist the questions so none of your practiced stories fit very well? Or they will say something like, "do you have a more recent story". Everyone, get the basic story telling thing down and have several twists and turns you can go down. But don't memorize a story.

Then they get to see you squirm as you ask for a moment to think of another one. This is what they want to see. How fast do you think on your feet and REACT to a question (uncomfortable situation?) you did not expect.

Where do I collect my interview prep fee??

Then there is the other theory that the hiring process is predisposed to hire only certain people before the interviewing starts. Minus the folks who really goof up the interview. Put more precisely, the pilot board has a preference for certain candidates and will only hire 30% whether the interviewers pass 30% or 100% of those interviewed

The 30% thing is pretty consistent. Try to interview with a bunch of sluggos.

I also believe in the 3rd interview try group having some preference. But I have no scientific proof of that. Could be your experience between the first and third try finally puts you in the very competitive category.
 
Last edited:
Puddlejumper, I have defended SWA's requirement of a 737 rating to get hired against the perception that it is PFT. So please don't take this wrong, but I think the the type rating requirement proves you to be wrong. You see, they automatically disqualify a tremendous amount of applicants with their type rating requirement; applicants who might have tremendous amounts of that "servant heart". Or, you could look at it like this, the 737 type rating requirement is a "prequalifier". If that is the case, then I have to ask: How does possessing a 737 type rating help the PD indentify those who possess a "warrior spirit, a servant heart, and a fun luving attitude"?

I tend to think that SWA's criteria for hiring is somewhat more simple. They, like EVERY OTHER employer are looking for employees who are easily managed.

I, being somewhat independent, don't appear to fit the mold. LOL.

Still,
:-)

The type rating...you know SWA has that requirement for insurance purposes...Part of the deal is they need to hire 737 typed pilots...by doing this they will save a bunch of money on their insurance. I am not 100% sure about this but I believe it has been documented to say that. Overall the applicant and new hire, in turn, is probably more experienced than average. CAL has hired guys without a single hour of PIC turbine. Has that made Cal unsafer? no...does it matter? no...but I bet to insurance companies and attorneys it does. By having this requirement SWA has gone past that and in turn saved money. So if an applicant already has the type, well that means they are ready now...and thats what they need. The day they run out of 737 type rated applicants then the scene might change...but I doubt it. Also, they have turned down a gargantuous amount of 737 type rated pilots...so this also disapproves what you are saying. If that was the case then they would not hire or interview a single applicant that did not have a type. They are hiring guys without types you know...in fact, turning down guys with types over guys without types. Having a type means nothing...except in their eyes you are ready now. Look at it like this...right now it is taking about 3 months from day one of the pool to class date. That is plenty of time to get a type if hired. It's a choice we make...if a pilot goes into the interview with a type, then maybe it does show dedication to SWA...but it's a choice this pilot made...not SWA. If you have the goods they will still hire you. It's more competitive to get the interview without the type...but that's the choice each person individually makes...not SWA.
 
It' s all bunch of bs do you all realize that?
Too many of us fliyng in the US

next question will be; how many hole has your right sock today?? and how aRE YOU GOING TO FIX THE SITUATION??

I don't know, how many hole has my right sock?


FI.com Crack addict of the day award goes to, Shindler, for making zero sense on two consecutive posts. Even better, both were edited.
 
The type rating...you know SWA has that requirement for insurance purposes...Part of the deal is they need to hire 737 typed pilots...by doing this they will save a bunch of money on their insurance. I am not 100% sure about this but I believe it has been documented to say that. Overall the applicant and new hire, in turn, is probably more experienced than average. CAL has hired guys without a single hour of PIC turbine. Has that made Cal unsafer? no...does it matter? no...but I bet to insurance companies and attorneys it does. By having this requirement SWA has gone past that and in turn saved money. So if an applicant already has the type, well that means they are ready now...and thats what they need. The day they run out of 737 type rated applicants then the scene might change...but I doubt it. Also, they have turned down a gargantuous amount of 737 type rated pilots...so this also disapproves what you are saying. If that was the case then they would not hire or interview a single applicant that did not have a type. They are hiring guys without types you know...in fact, turning down guys with types over guys without types. Having a type means nothing...except in their eyes you are ready now. Look at it like this...right now it is taking about 3 months from day one of the pool to class date. That is plenty of time to get a type if hired. It's a choice we make...if a pilot goes into the interview with a type, then maybe it does show dedication to SWA...but it's a choice this pilot made...not SWA. If you have the goods they will still hire you. It's more competitive to get the interview without the type...but that's the choice each person individually makes...not SWA.

You're probably correct about the insurance thing, but you aren't addressing my question.

How does requiring a 737 type rating help the PD identify those who possess a "warrior spirit, a servant heart, and a fun luving attitude"?

OBTW, I can find a couple of thousand if not ten thousand pilots with legitimate 121PIC time in aircraft similar to the fluf. Do you believe that one of them is somehow less qualified to be an SWA newhire than a 135Metroliner pilot who just bought his 737 rating and has never flown 121?
 
Great post everyone! So basically what the whole interview/hiring process comes down to is PFM.
 
You know the loudest guy in the crewroom, kind of annoying but always draws attention because he tells great stories, that is who will get the job. Usually when this annoying, loud guy gets hired, the rest of the crew room scatches there heads and says "why him?" Its because these guys tell great stories.

Ever hear a SWA guy get asked a simple question by ATC? Something along the lines of:

ATC:"Southwest XXX, say speed"

SWA: (in that finger nail on the chalkboard Texass slur) "Well we indicatunnn about decimaaaall sebum sebum and willun to put just about whatever it is is you want in d'winduh"

Simple question. Too long of an answer.

I suppose since you spend such long days in tight quarters of that cramped 737 cockpit that you better be able to keep the other guy entertained. Pair that with the noisy cockpit and you better have a good octave range to match the story so the other guy can hear you.

I heard one SWA guy in LAX recently that spent entirely too much time talking like a hay seed on the radio for a taxi instruction that did not require the numerous words he was cranking out.
 
The great thing about living in America is freedom of choice. Plain and simple. We make decisions based on our own requirements and then we live with them whether good or bad. Have I made some wrong choices in this business? Absolutely. Could I have made better choices along the way? Probably. However, what counts in the long run is that you live with those decisions and make the best of it. I have been at CAL now since 05 and it has been great. I love the flying and can honestly say this is the best job I have ever had in this business and I have had many. Will it last? Only time will tell but in the meantime I plan to enjoy it to the utmost. All I can say is to pursue your dreams and do what you can to achieve them whether it is to work at SWA, FEDeX, CAL, etc... Everyone has a choice and that's what makes us different.

Oh, bye the way I am sitting here writing this in my hotel room in Japan. Flying back to Honolulu tonite. Fantastic.
 
Last edited:
I heard one SWA guy that spent entirely too much time talking .

Unlike your typically ceaseless and boring anti-SWA tirades?
 
The great thing about living in America is freedom of choice. Plain and simple. We make decisions based on our own requirements and then we live with them whether good or bad. Have I made some wrong choices in this business? Absolutely. Could I have made better choices along the way? Probably. However, what counts in the long run is that you live with those decisions and make the best of it. I have been at CAL now since 05 and it has been great. I love the flying and can honestly say this is the best job I have ever had in this business and I have had many. Will it last? Only time will tell but in the meantime I plan to enjoy it to the utmost. All I can say is to pursue your dreams and do what you can to achieve them whether it is to work at SWA, FEDeX, CAL, etc... Everyone has a choice and that's what makes us different.

Oh, bye the way I am sitting here writing this in my hotel room in Japan. Flying back to Honolulu tonite. Fantastic.

I have to agree...life is all what you make of it. CAL, FedEx, UPS, SWA, (insert airline name)...it's all what you make of it. There will be good times and bad...in the end it's all about what one makes of life.
 
How about those ebonic answers from those unicef playaz at eeoc inc!
Right to the race card. Do you have to wear a Klan suit to your SWA interview or are you the exception to the rule. I can share the post you have sent me if you wish.




They could be like those 2 fools in PVD who crossed how many active runways and absolutely NO clue what planet they were on. But hey, look at what eeoc has done for them, ebonics and all!
Or those two fools in BUR or the other two fools in MDW. I have a feeling they probably wished they were on another planet after leaving the jet outside the airport boundary. You've had enough F-ups to probably warrant not tossing stones. But instead you are an arrogant imbecile that is best suited for living in the Herb Tur$.

And oh by the way. Looky what I found Ms. Scarlett, SWA is part of this program also. http://www.obap.org/Programs/programs-scholarship-airline.asp

Holy Taco Senor'
http://www.southwest.com/careers/stars/star_jul06.html

And for the Grand Finale. Is this you Bosley?????
http://www.southwest.com/careers/stars/star_sep05.html
 
Last edited:
MRFlyer,

Wanna keep score?

Gup

Score what? You have Casper Bosley saying that UAL is the only carrier with a minority pilot and it appears there are a few at SWA also. Bosley also thinks UAL is the only carrier to have had an accident or incident. All in all I am just supplying a little reality to his life.

Bosley's website: www.bosley.com
 
MRY,
Please contain your rage & know that many airline pilots have made mistakes in the past. May you never do what they have done... Until then, serve (work at) your company like anyone will do theirs... Until then, never look down on a fellow pilot...
 
MRY,
Please contain your rage & know that many airline pilots have made mistakes in the past. May you never do what they have done... Until then, serve (work at) your company like anyone will do theirs... Until then, never look down on a fellow pilot...

Please read your fellow aviators post by the name of Bosley and then think about what you just wrote.
 
MRYFLYER;1169929 Or those two fools in BUR or the other two fools in MDW. I have a feeling they probably wished they were on another planet after leaving the jet outside the airport boundary. [/quote said:
I dont care who you work for, you got to admit that was a funny come back.
 
I'm sorry you didn't get hired by Southwest, but you know that you can reapply after 1 year. Fortunately the system works, that way we don't have idiots like you manning the cockpits!

Sorry to disappoint you bosley, but I have been at UAL for a very long time. In fact when I came to UAL, SWA was but just another of the two bit airlines flying 737's. Ironically some things never change.

The snow white image you paint of SWA appears to be in direct contrast with the evidence on your own website. You like to call UAL some very nasty names yet when one looks at your carrier we see that your hiring practices may actually be very similar. The only difference is you make all your people pay for their training. Which I suppose is exactly what you did when you were unable to secure a job with a Legacy carrier.

Anyway glad to see you have the hair club thing going and hope that helps with the future. www.bosley.com It does explain your inordinate anger towards UAL. We are all quaffed here with genes to produce a well stocked head of hair. Perhaps SWA should have you pay for a DNA test to see if you can produce hair?

Good luck with all that.
 
What happened to the thread being overprepped? I believe that everyone should be prepared for an interview, however being over-prepped these days is synonomous with using "canned answers". How about being original, and using real life experiences that all of us have encountered, as opposed to a paid interview prep "answer"

L79
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom