Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA to have a Q1 loss?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
NO, it was your RJ that was the beginning and end of this profession. :smash:

NO, the RJ was a response to the competitive pressure from LCCs, shedding flying that could not be done profitably in the new market place. Legacy's focused on the flying that they can consistently do profitably and outsourced the rest.

Ever read NUTS? Southwest was THE main force driving down fares, they boast of it. Deregulation brought flying to the masses wearing flip flops and and track suits, that is what was intended. If not Southwest, it would have been someone else.

The fact is that there are far more people flying today than ever and there are far more pilots employed today than would be without deregulation. Flying just doesn't pay near what it used to, and never will again. The term "Jet setter" is obsolete.

You didn't destroy this profession any more than I did. It was forces beyond the control of all of us and it was inevitable after deregulation. We both owe our current jobs to the results of deregulation.

Peace
 
Yeah but one thing you guys fail to see is that the other airlines have conditioned the consumer to pay for bags. So Gary always has this card in his back pocket and when he decides to play it SWA will once again be filling up the money bags. Even if he decides first bag flies free he still has millions of ancillary revenue to capture. The LUV machine has options and when the time is right they will execute.
 
Plus adding 6 more seats to their existing 700 line.

Really? Ouch!!

I thought SWA had decent, but not really generous seat pitch (I'm tall, so I definitely notice these things). I don't like the idea of adding an extra row. Then again, I'm just a freeloading jumpseater.
 
Yeah but one thing you guys fail to see is that the other airlines have conditioned the consumer to pay for bags. So Gary always has this card in his back pocket and when he decides to play it SWA will once again be filling up the money bags. Even if he decides first bag flies free he still has millions of ancillary revenue to capture. The LUV machine has options and when the time is right they will execute.


From the SWA "People's Court" TV Commercials----"No, Southwest would NEVER do that...." Aren't they charging for bags now via Airtran?


Godspeed!


The OYSter
 
Baffling. Curious if the SWA pilots support taxiing with both running?

Umm...yes...I do. 90% of the time, our taxi time to the end of the runway is 5 minutes or less. This means during 4-5 minutes of aircraft movement, you're multi-tasking and/or heads down for that other engine start...recipe for trouble with 3500 aircraft movements daily, day in, day out. We do allow for engine shutdown during long delays...both 1 and/or both when appropriate.
 
Last edited:
This means during 4-5 minutes of aircraft movement, you're multi-tasking and/or heads down for that other engine start...recipe for trouble with 3500 aircraft movements daily, day in, day out.

We've been doing it safely for years without any problems. It saves tons of money. With no demonstrated reduction in safety, it's crazy not to implement it.
 
We've been doing it safely for years without any problems. It saves tons of money. With no demonstrated reduction in safety, it's crazy not to implement it.

OK...tell me...how many "tons of money"?....:rolleyes:


and...let's talk SWA systemwide,...not just ATL..
 
Last edited:
Even if you delay by 2-3 min the savings are large.

2 minutes x 3500 flts/day = 7000 minutes or 116.67 hrs
Whats idle fuel burn? Lets say 700lbs/hr at idle. That's 81669lbs or 12189 gal PER DAY
Over an entire year its almost 4.5million gallons or $15,500,000 savings at $3.50/gal.

Not insignificant and we've been doing it SAFELY on the AT side for years.
 
It's over $23M annual savings if the delayed start is 3 min per flight. Whether were talking $15M or $23M they're both "tons of money" to me.
 
and....taxiing, crossing runways, getting cleared to line up and wait...in idle power, all within 5 minutes, while ascertaining the F/A's have secured the cabin....For those 5 minutes, which is a significant portion of SWA's schedule....things happen...
 

Latest resources

Back
Top