SWA culture!

[dicko]

Your MC wouldn't bring you a deal that good for at least 75% of you?

Maybe this is going to be harder than I thought!

Gup

I don't know Gup. I'm speaking as one of the disenfranchised 75% in your 'master plan'.

I would think that they have been given some guidelines that include protecting, to some degree, seats and seniority.

I cant speak for them. I'm just line swine.

 

[Ty Webb]

Your MC wouldn't bring you a deal that good for at least 75% of you?

Maybe this is going to be harder than I thought!

Gup

That's not a good deal for anyone at AAI. :erm:

And, everything you do to me, you do to 1,300 guys below me. . . .

 

[dicko]

Gup,

You're talking about 650 Captains losing their seat. An arbiter has never done that to the best of my knowledge.

 

[ivauir]

Those are YOUR posts, ya ******************************bag. :laugh:

And the parts where you quoted me were from early October, 2010. . . . . Got that big ol' honkin' watch and still don't know what year it is.

Ty,

Why would a quote from October 2010 be irrelevant? The fact is that you have, repeatedly, discussed your SLI expectations. You can try to play the victim, but don't expect anyone to buy it.

The internet has no eraser.

 

[Lear70]

Your MC wouldn't bring you a deal that good for at least 75% of you?

Maybe this is going to be harder than I thought!

Gup

The merger commitee's promise to the pilot group was that each segment of the agreement would stand on its own merit (meaning no "sacrifice seniority for money" arguments) and that no one demographic would be sacrificed for another.

So yes, it's no easy task. I still think they can do it, but it won't be easy.

 

[jball2]

What cracks me up is the negotiations are apparently apparently going amicably and word from SWAPA is they are closing the gaps. On here, the gap is getting wider. The best part is the amount of misunderstanding about the process coming from both sides. Some of you really need to take a break or a while.

 

[ivauir]

So, let me get this straight . . .

SWAPA signs the Process Agreement they negotiated "in good faith", then

SWAPA doesn't like the results of the process that they negotiated and agreed to abide by, so

SWAPA goes to Gary Kelly and asks him to "save" them from the results of the agreement they themselves negotiated and signed . . . . or they are going to -what- hold the whole airline hostage . . . . in the name of "saving the culture"? :erm:

Oh, and you want SWA management to ignore existing law, repudiate statements made to shareholders, and reneg on documents signed with AirTran and ATN71, all because you're upset you didn't get to take away an AirTran Captain's seat? :erm:

Some of you guys need to find a new mullah to get your bullet points from. :laugh:

I suggest you re read the process agreement. You seem to think it guarantees things that it does not.

Peace.

 

[tankerhead]

I do not work for SWA. I started posting on these threads mainly after seeing Lear70s hypocrisy when his old threads begging to be stapled were discovered and then especially when he banned me for bringing them up. Secondly, I like posting in these threads because I think Ty Webb is such an a-clown and will be thrilled to see you stapled.

Probably my biggest reason for posting is to see TyWebb get what's coming to him. It will be a joy to see you slapped down a peg. So if you really want to talk about propaganda, your bad attitude has almost single-handedly turned me, a non SWA and non AT pilot with nothing to gain or lose, into rooting for Southwest Airlines to staple your butts.

I also truly believe a staple is the fairest thing and what will ultimately happen based on logic.

Bobby, have you been drinking? That's the most we've heard from you in quite a while, if not ever! So this is just a personal vendetta for you against someone's (Lear's and Ty's) internet personality. That's pathetic if true. Even more pathetic than pretending to not be a childish corn-dog.

 

[Ty Webb]

Ty,

Why would a quote from October 2010 be irrelevant?

Re-read what I wrote- I said I hadn't mentioned my SLI expectations since 2010, when our respective MC/NC's asked us not to.

That's why it is irrelevant.

Sheesh. :erm:

 

[Bob Dylan]

Bobby, have you been drinking? That's the most we've heard from you in quite a while, if not ever! So this is just a personal vendetta for you against someone's (Lear's and Ty's) internet personality. That's pathetic if true. Even more pathetic than pretending to not be a childish corn-dog.

Whatever dipstick. Couldn't give two squats what you think.

I personally believe that a staple is the fairest integration. I follow these threads because of your two trannie loudmouths, Ty and Lear.