T1bubba
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 317
I guess because they don't see it as free since they have to supply the manpower to put the entry together.
I agree with your point though. Even if they did drop down a few notches on the list I would think that making the "best companies to work for" list would do wonders for recruitment. And since they pride themselves on being picky about the people they hire I think that having someone in the People Department spend some time on getting an entry together would be well worth it.
I can understand that they had other things to worry about after 9/11, but I was surprised to see they didn't choose to participate this year. Oh well, maybe next year?
I agree with your point though. Even if they did drop down a few notches on the list I would think that making the "best companies to work for" list would do wonders for recruitment. And since they pride themselves on being picky about the people they hire I think that having someone in the People Department spend some time on getting an entry together would be well worth it.
I can understand that they had other things to worry about after 9/11, but I was surprised to see they didn't choose to participate this year. Oh well, maybe next year?