Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA Article

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

chase

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2001
Posts
1,217
Southwest keeps employees happy

By Mitchell Schnurman
Star-Telegram Staff Writer


Low costs are a way of life at Southwest Airlines, but here's a
little secret: Many of its pilots are among the best-paid in the
business.

That would seem to be a pricey contradiction, except that the key is
variable pay, not guaranteed salaries.

Southwest pilots earn about 20 percent less each month than their
colleagues at mainline carriers, but many Southwest pilots eventually
lap the competition because of stock options, profit sharing and
performance bonuses.

Those variable elements have made millionaires out of some Southwest
pilots without ratcheting up the company's expenses.

Not surprisingly, stock options have been eagerly adopted by most of
the airline's other workers.

At Southwest, it's a virtuous circle, holding down labor costs,
boosting productivity and rewarding the people responsible for the
company's success. That, in turn, drives more growth, more job
opportunities and a stronger stock price.

Executives at other airlines marvel at the trust between Southwest
managers and employees. But Jim Parker, Southwest's chief executive,
says it's just a matter of everyone realizing that what goes around
comes around.

How they work together now, how they treat one another, how they
succeed or fail -- those experiences dictate the attitudes going
forward.

"It's a round world," says Parker, a key negotiator on some of the
company's breakthrough contracts.

Other airlines, including United, have tried to emulate the Southwest
approach. But none can match Southwest's stellar performance on the
bottom line and on Wall Street.

When losses mount and the stock price tumbles, workers can rebel. At
other airlines, they demanded raises in "hard pay" -- compensation
they can count on -- without worrying about the impact on expenses.

Now the big airlines are in deep trouble, not only because of the
slow economy and the 9-11 attacks, but also because their labor costs
are so high.

Southwest has maintained its cost advantage and profits despite the
worst financial decline in aviation history. And Southwest hasn't
laid off any workers, a colossal achievement that scores big in labor
talks.

"Job security has never been more important," said Greg Crum, a
Southwest pilot and vice president of flight operations, who pointed
out that about 8,000 pilots industrywide are on furlough.

The Southwest plan has attracted some criticism. Pilots who join the
company after a contract takes effect get a new strike price on their
options. That can reduce their total returns and create some
resentment in the cockpit.

But here's the most telling referendum on the deal: Southwest pilots
overwhelmingly approved the latest contract, even though it wasn't
due to expire for two years and didn't come close to closing the gap
with Delta's "hard pay."

Half of the pilot union's leadership balked at the proposal. But
Southwest pilots approved it by a ratio more than 2-to-1 in August,
extending it to 2006.

Delta pilots, the highest-paid in the business, earn 22 percent to 24
percent more than Southwest pilots with the same experience on the
same Boeing 737s, according to Air Inc., an Atlanta company that
provides career information to pilots.

"They agreed to take less pay," Air Inc.'s Kit Darby said about
Southwest. "But you have to look at the whole package. They get a lot
of stock options and profit sharing."

In 1994, Southwest pilots agreed to a groundbreaking, 10-year
contract that locked in pay rates for five years in exchange for
hefty stock options. Senior pilots, for example, received options for
10,000 shares.

Since then, Southwest's stock has split four times and its price has
soared, even after accounting for the latest downturn in the
industry. The initial stakes for those senior pilots now total 50,625
shares, with a base price, adjusted for splits, of $3.95 a share.

Last January, when Southwest was trading at more than $23, those
stakes were worth just under $1 million. At Friday's price of $14.35,
the paper value is $525,000 for each of the pilots.

The contract extension signed in August appears to be another savvy
deal. It gives pilots an average of about 9,500 shares each, with a
strike price of $12.84.

By Thanksgiving, Southwest's stock was trading above $16, and pilots
were up $34,580, at least on paper. By year-end, much of the gain had
been given back, but the airline industry is cyclical.

That underlines the tricky nature of stock options. Their actual
value hinges on when workers get them and at what price, and when
they sell them, again at what price.

The upside potential is great, but the process requires careful
tending.

Southwest's pay has other valuable elements. Its profit-sharing plan
has been huge because the company has made money for 29 consecutive
years and is easily the most profitable airline. Southwest has
typically contributed 10 percent to 15 percent of each worker's pay
into a profit-sharing account, and employees decide how to invest the
funds.

For pilots, some of whom earn more than $155,000 a year, the profit-
sharing numbers can add up quickly. But Southwest does not have a
traditional pension plan, which has been a staple at the mainline
carriers and a major income source for retirees.

One pilot said that Southwest's profit sharing is approximately the
equivalent of a traditional pension. Maybe by some measures. But the
current crisis in the airline industry has put traditional pensions
under pressure while employees at Southwest have cash in their
accounts.

Southwest also has a 401(k) plan that matches the pilots'
contribution, dollar for dollar for 7.3 percent of pay -- more than
double the average match.

"We emphasize the value of the entire package," Parker said.

Surely that's one reason that ramp workers recently agreed to a
contract extension, even though it freezes pay for two years. Their
deal includes stock options, which have become a staple with nearly
all worker groups at Southwest.

Darby calls the Southwest approach "self-adjusting." If there are no
profits, there's no profit sharing, and the stock options aren't a
hard cost.

"The problem is that you have to sell employees on doing it," Darby
said. "They start out wanting cash."

Southwest makes it work because employees have faith in management:
not just to boost stock values but to treat workers well and to keep
its business model humming.

The company uses only one kind of plane, which cuts maintenance costs
and turnaround time. It also lets Southwest pilots spend more hours
in the air without wasting energy jockeying for higher-paying slots
on larger jets.

At most other airlines, pilots move ahead by being promoted to bigger
planes. But that career ladder also drives up training costs and
makes it harder to match pilots with planes.

Southwest says it pays competitive rates for all its employees. By
adding stock options to the mix, it keeps pay from skyrocketing and
motivates workers to push harder.

That keeps the company growing, which creates more jobs. Southwest
pilots have typically advanced to the captain's seat in less than six
years, about half the time of pilots at many other airlines -- and
that promotion adds the biggest boost to pay.

"At the end of the day, Southwest pilots aren't losing out," Darby
said. "They've taken a risk, and it's paid off."

It's paid off for the company, too. And its customers.


_____________

What's important for everyone to realize not every pilot is or will be a millionaire by working here. The level of expansion & splits in stock can't be guaranteed for future folks. I'll post later the stock options that have been negotiated for new hires. Gotta go,
 
mmmm KOOL-AID

Didn't qxpelt already cutn'paste this????

Yes, SWA IS SMART. That's why they are #2 on Fortune Magazines most admired companies. They have an outstanding business plan and have developed incredible efficiencies.

Here's where the kool-aid is replaced with reality....They are no where be found on this years Fortune's 100 "Best Companies to work for"
www.fortune.com/fortune/information/Presscenter/0,,01062003BC,00.html

Don't get me wrong, If SWA had offered me class date before FDX, I'd be there. They are a great company.....particularly if you are a stockholder.

The bottom line is that this is BIG business. It's all about $$$ and looking good for the shareholders. Labor is a Tool. A tool, like airplanes and Jet fuel. Like airplanes and fuel, the company needs these to operate and make money. SWA, like anyone else, in any industry is trying to spend as little money as it can on its tools. They negotiate with Boeing for airplanes and are constantly hedging on fuel.

They have done some incredible things with efficiencies that have added to their success, particularly with a common fleet of aircraft, quick turns, use of secondary airports and the list goes on.

Where I believe they have no equal, is their ability successfully keep their Labor costs very low. They do this with "Culture", "LUV", profit sharing, options and a whole lot of KOOL-AID.

I think profit sharing is a great thing! So are options, but I wouldn't count on them. Ask any UAL guy who is about to retire. SWA is smart, and that’s why they are going to pay you as little as possible. They know that a certain amount of compensation can be replaced with “Culture”. They also know that culture and kool-aid only go so far. They will pay you to that point, and no more. But they keep that carrot dangled out in front in the form of profit sharing to make you productive. It truly is an outstanding business model! But never forget, you, as labor, are tool to them…nothing more. And just like in any business, they will always try minimize their expenses.

I am not slamming SWA, they address Labor issues better than my employer. Just trying to give some of the Kool-Aid drinkers a taste of reality.

I apologize to those who I offend……Except Doughboy!
 
USNFDX,

SWA didn't participate in the 2001 Fortune list by choice, I'm guessing they did the same thing again in 2002. After all they were in the top 5 for 4 years in a row prior to 9/11, and if anything labor relations have gotten better in the meantime (they've settled several contracts).

As they said after 9/11, it's more important to do the things that got us to the top than to take a lot of time to prove to Fortune that we still do those things. It's a matter of priorities, and I think that making the Fortune list is no longer one of SWA's.

As for labor vs management, ask the folks at some of the airlines having trouble now if they wish their management had done a better job keeping costs in line. Management's role is to help the airline make money, and I can only hope that SWA's management will continue to be as successful in the future as they have in the past.

From my perspective as someone about to start class while many of my friends continue to be furloughed, the kool-aid looks pretty good!
 
Last edited:
USNFDX

Feeling kinda silly now?
 
To USNFDX

I don't disagree with much of what you said. The tone of your msg may turn some folks off but all employees, including execs. are only labor costs. There are certainly priorities that need to be met by the company, profitability to shareholders (employees & non-employees), safety & reliability to the customer, fair treatment to the employees. The cost of labor is a factor & SWA has tried to keep these costs as low as possible, just like they have kept their fuel costs down by fuel hedging. I hope they continue to follow these past practices & explore new ones to keep our costs low so we can still have a company that will be productive and safe. We are not industry leading wage now & are some ways away but if the other carriers have givebacks to the point to where our salary is industry leading will that mean that SWAPA won't negotiate at the next point (in '05 for a '06 ratification date) to get raises? I don't think so but the market will need to be judged on what our costs are relative to others & negotiate accordingly. Being thankful for working at SWA doesn't mean one doesn't understand it is still a business but there are vast differences in how one company achieves success over another. One of the keys for us has been good relationships with management & labor. This upsets some folks who immediately assume labor is being had & management is winning. It isn't a zero sum game that some purport it to be but that is an arguable point & one we probably disagree on.

As I ended my last post with references to family & SWA, my first priority is to my family, 2nd to SWA. When SWA can't provide for the needs of my family I'll either adjust my needs or look for a different job. So far everything is working out OK. I wish your company the best & hope for improving relations. Labels that are thrown around don't add much to the discussion but facts or reason do. Thanks for the latter.

cheers
 
Last edited:
Sorry.........

Let me first apologize to those whom I offended. Coming from the military I feel as though I was a bit naive about working for a big company. I to0 drank Kool-Aid. Orange and Purple vice Canyon Blue.

I had rude awakening as to what really goes on. Don't get me wrong, I have a great job, and am really lucky to have it. But I now realize that "mongo small pond (tool)" in big game of Fedex Life. I work hard and get paid well. But this is big Business, and big business care about profits and shareholders. I care about my family.

When SWA or Fedex hires us, we are truly lucky. By the same token they are lucky to have us. Not that they couldn't replace us in a heartbeat. But they don't hire us out of charity. They do it because they need people to fly the new airplanes that they are taking delivery on.

As I stated over and over in my previous post, SWA is great company, and a great pilot career. I'm not trying piss in anybodies wheaties. Just watch the intake of the Kool-Aid. Talk those who have spent several years on the line, do some research and form your own opinions. Isn’t that what these boards about, opinions?? I know …like @$$holes, I’ve got‘em both!

Incidentally, Why didn't SWA take themselves out of any other of Fortunes Lists? Like 100 most admired companies? Maybe because the 100 Best Companies to work for is partially determined by wages verses the industry average. With wage inflation in all areas of the airline industry, they had nowhere to go but down.

I’m done! Direct all fire to Quigs, I heard him talking about your mother!
:)
 
Re: Sorry.........

No offense taken. I think most everyone understands where pilots stand in the big scheme of corporate profits, but SWA has done a remarkable job of keeping the "small company feel" as they've grown into a big company.


USNFDX said:

Incidentally, Why didn't SWA take themselves out of any other of Fortunes Lists? Like 100 most admired companies? Maybe because the 100 Best Companies to work for is partially determined by wages verses the industry average. With wage inflation in all areas of the airline industry, they had nowhere to go but down.
:)

More likely because someone else does all the work for the other lists, i.e. you can't make 10,000 people not list you as an admired company when they fill out a survey. :)
 
Free advertising

T1

I don't know, with all the money, time and effort SWA puts into it's marketing, why not free publicity?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top