ultrarunner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 4,322
I don't disagree with what you say.......However, I think you failed to see or appreciate my point. My point is: perhaps SWA should think more on a moral or ethical scale when considering their "MINIMUM standards".
Not everyone has a rich Mommy and Daddy such as yourself. And some of us have families to support.
Opps..didn't mean to say "dude". But it is funny how that corresponds to today's 'aviation wonder children,' of which I am not.
Now, back on topic. I see your point and can appreciate it from your point of view. If it were MY goal to work at SWA, and I couldn't afford the entry to the game, I'd be pretty bummed out. It's a gamble, no doubt about it, and not a gamble everyone can make. As they say, you only bet what you can afford to loose....
But to reduce a corporations decision on a 'technical qualification' to a moral or ethical issue, is so out of touch as to be unbelievable!
And it's that attitude that you carried into the interview that made the difference. NOT the pressure, IMHO. Heck, you already spent the money! So, in the end, you gambled and lost...we've all gambled man....
I'd let it go....
No disrespect intended.
--Ultra
Last edited: